Hammer-fist
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
- Messages
- 1,221
- Reaction score
- 0
Because of course Gujarat and Rajasthan don't exist.
And if Dravidistan is one then why would Kerala and Tamil Nadu be fighting?
Perhaps we can give back Goa to the Portuguese while we are it and re-install the Nizam in Hyderabad.
Infact, Khalistan is not a bad idea either - with Lahore as its capital.
And since a divided Bengal was the curse of Curzon according to our common national poet Tagore - a unified Bengal too would be nice.
I am think we can give Andamans to the Danes since the Danes controlled it earlier - perhaps they will set up a nice cookie factory there.
I am still confounded with Lakshadweep - perhaps hand it to one of the Arab states.
1. If Gujaratis (with your beloved Nardenra Modi) would like to secede from the rump "India" they would be welcome to. They would be further cut off from ASEAN and the huge economic market of China and even east India itself but hey so be it.
2. Rajasthan is a barren desert land. They can do whatever they please.
3. "Dravinand" had serious proponents before 1965 and since that year southern Indians are loyal Indians commited to the unity of India, as that war united them. However if southern India did secede they would attain first world standards of poverty having got rid of the poorer and more unstable north.
4. Goa, do what you want with them.
5. Khalistan, no thanks. Sikh Punjabis are well known for being arrogant jerks and bullying other Indians an independent Sardar state would be unbearable, long may they "enjoy" Indian rule.
6. A unified Bengal would ultimately become an overwhelming Muslim state so "Bengaliness" would become synonymous with being Muslim. I'd like to see an independent West Bengal as a brother state and ally who we have cultural and ethnic ties to but that's all.
little correction, we were not part of India or India hasn't nothing to do with Sri Lanka.
Sri Lanka and Maldives are the only 2 countries not belong to Indian subcontinent either.
Correct.
However Sri Lanka is part of South Asia (if Sri Lanka doesn't want to be identified as such that is fine by me and I will not call it that, though my Sri Lankan Tamil friend gets annoyed by the constant omission of Sri Lanka when people talk of Bangladesh, India and Pakistan as the main South Asian countries) and was British ruled, and it was the British who carved up south Asia and thus our current borders.