What's new

Malala’s attacker was held, freed in 2009: sources

.
It's an accusation against a guy caught in a active war zone. Nobody goes to FATA and Waziristan to do sight-seeing!!!
Multiple things wrong with that. People live in FATA and Waziristan. They can catch a resident and accuse him and we have to take their word for it? Prove their guilt.

The way the world works you catch somebody, they have to be tried in a court of law, you can't poke them with a pin without that.

It is an accusation against a guy caught making a bomb.
Did you collect evidence to the fact they were caught making a bomb? Just saying so, will carry the weight of a testimony but for example if the said bomb is not saved, dusted for finger prints it may come off that the testimony may get tainted.

Okay, for one second it is granted that there isn't enough proof against other folks, but what more proof do you need against Lal Masjid Mullah?

He was released on bail since the Pak government did not try him for their vote bank politics.

The best conviction we have is for the guy who attacked Musharraf, he pleaded guilty and referred to the president as a "Kafir" in court. He was handed down a life sentence and was broken out of prisoner earlier this year, now enjoying celebrity status in NWA.

There you go, really not the fault of the courts, fault of the government.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom