its quite not possible.
embassy is a sovereign property and cannot be searched.
But at least it sends a message. The courts of the past could not have stood in the ruling party's plans the way the courts of today are showing. It's one of the few bright lights. I don't think anybody in Pakistan is too happy about this lack of respect for Pakistani law and sovereignty being displayed by the Americans. Obama was quite clear that he wants better relations with Pakistan, I don't see that being implemented anywhere. He's all for expanding drone strikes in Pakistan, the single point on which almost every Pakistani, Taliban or not, agrees upon. And, under his administration, American diplomats in Pakistan are making enemies witht he entire country. The problem is, in our corrupt system, if you know who to bribe, you can get away with anything.
Like I said, generally, I'm all for wait and see. But the next time a Black Land Cruiser with tinted windows goes through a barrier, or the next time armed men refuse to submit to the law enforcement, I wouldn't protest against use of force. Especially now, since those American citizens were arrested for terrorism, it makes no sense to give them any benefit of the doubt simply because they display immunity cards.
The troubling thing is, you hear nothing about this in the media here in North America. I am sure there are many Americans out there that would find it outrageous if their diplomats made joke of the law of the land in another country. It may be hard for some to believe, but there are some very intelligent Americans around, those gifted with a neutral lens.
The Iranians know how to do this. Just look what friends the USA and Iran are now, 30 years later.
You can't really say it's the same thing at all. Yes, embassies may be exempted from the jurisdiction of the courts (I am not 100% sure about this), but all vehicles and personnel entering and exiting the embassy can be checked, and if enough evidence is gathered, an armed inspection can take place. It's not like the Marines (or whoever) stationed there would begina firefight with the forces, they won't have a choice.
Though I agree, relations after such actions would probably not be very warm. But as I see it, right now, the warmth is very much one-sided anyway. You have luncheons with our arch rivals, and your people disrespect our laws and sovereignty, it's crossing the line a bit.
Edit
I have no idea why the term Yankee is such a controversy. As I see it, they've got a team named such, it can't possibly be insulting.