CriticalThought
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2016
- Messages
- 7,094
- Reaction score
- 13
- Country
- Location
They can make critical judgement based on whatever system of ethics they follow. Just don't try to 're-interpret' Islam for us Muslims. Their opinion holds no credibility amongst Muslims. In general, it is highly logical, if you want to really understand a religion, ask the people whose forefathers have been following it for thousands of years.Right there you've made the assertion that people who claim to be victims of Muslims and their religion have no claim to exercise critical judgment upon them. So you're moniker is a misnomer - that is, a cheat.
So it's not enough to be a Muslim, but you have to be the right sort of Muslim. That's a fine recipe for conflicting claims to leadership, right? And how is such a dispute supposed to be resolved without violence and tyranny?
The dispute is to be resolved in the light of Quran and Sunnah which are shining beacons of Divine Guidance for us. I mean, do you really believe that Allah the Almighty has left His final religion in a state where its followers cannot sort out right from wrong?
And since discerning the intentions are (by your definition) not part of Shariat how are Muslims supposed to discern them?
The 'Mizaaj-e-Shariat', or the intention of Shariat, is taught from teacher to student, and passed from heart to heart. We have scholars who can retrace this line of tutelage right back to Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu 'Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam. Along with the rules and regulations of Shariat, the main thing taught in Madressahs is piety, Godfearliness, and goodness of character. Now it does take all sorts, so you see the good with the bad. I agree Madressahs need to do a better job, but calling them 'factories of terrorism', or calling for their demolition is ignorance of the highest order.
In the recent arguments about the new Sindh conversion law it was claimed such man-made laws were unnecessary. As near as I can tell it's because according to the law's opponents a Muslim should be allowed to exercise his will over non-Muslims and lesser Muslims as he wishes and only face divine judgement for his deeds after death. Do you agree or disagree with this?
I do not have to agree or disagree. Our religion scholars are on top of the situation, and already the Sindh Government is reviewing the law. Alhamdulillah we have people of such knowledge and upstanding who are here to challenge the vile machinations of this Western backed anti-Islam lobby.
A terrorist slaughtering cult is totally my ball game, where amd how do I sign up...
You really believe that these mullahs give a shit about the courts they label western, secular and satanic. The government took Qadri to court and see where it lead, the government tried to take the red mosque clerics to court and do you see where that lead, ever day the LEAs take terrorists and their abettors into custody only to be released under the pressure if certain political parties. They are traitors of the highest order and do you knw what the punishment for treachery in Islam is, it the death penalty. The idea of Madrassahs is not bad in itself but the way they are raised, funded and propagated is of concern. They are funded by outside powers to meet their grand strategic and sectarian designs and have no regard for national interests.
These madaris are responsible for churning out tens of thousands of ignorant, if not borderline brainwashed, youths who believe in a very rigid and impractical interpretation of Islam.
I am not a westernised elite, I am just a middle class guy who is fed up of being labelled an insolent libtard when I advocate knowledge of the deen along with knowledge of the world.
If you ever registered an actual party with the official agenda of being a terrorist slaughtering cult, the courts will send you to jail just like you would deserve.
Your opinion of the judicial system is tarred by your own vested interests. If the courts were to deal with them strictly you would be happy. That is, you are not interested in the correct application of law. Rather, you have made up a law in your mind and you want it promulgated by hook or by crook. Such people are usually called 'Man on a mission', are highly unstable, and it is best to find them in real life and put them in their place before the become a menace to society.