What's new

‘Macro adjustments to hurt economic growth’

Differences over devaluation surfaced in fiscal policy board meeting
Finance Minister asks SBP to develop information sharing mechanism on major decisions, meanwhile, government expects improvement in economy after January 2019

By
Ghulam Abbas
-
December 7, 2018
0
383
asad-umar.jpg


ISLAMABAD: In the second meeting of the Monetary and Fiscal Policies Coordination Board held here at the Ministry of Finance on Friday, major differences surfaced between the ministry and the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) over the devaluation of the local currency against the US dollar.

The board met to review the current state of Pakistan’s economy under the chair of Finance Minister Asad Umar.

Sources familiar with the situation told Pakistan Today that during the meeting Asad Umar complained as to why he was not kept in the loop regarding major decisions such as the devaluation of the Pakistani rupee which pushed the dollar to a record high of Rs142 in the inter-bank market with an increase of Rs8 on November 30.

However, insiders claim, that SBP governor said that the bank had already informed the Finance Ministry about the expected devaluation of rupee in the previous meeting of the Monetary and Fiscal Policies Coordination Board held on November 29.

Further, it was learned that Asad Umar showed his dissatisfaction and reportedly said that although his government believes in the autonomy of the central bank, however, the government should be informed regarding major decisions and developments.

Moreover, Asad Umar has directed that a mechanism be prepared to allow easy exchange of information between the central bank and the ministry. He said that the government should be informed regarding such information beforehand so that it can be in a position where it can defend such decisions and face the public.

However, the SBP officials suggested that the ministry let the bank decide the exchange rate as per market mechanism.

In the last meeting of the board, Ministry of Commerce had also objected the free fall of currency and changes in interest rate saying that the move may badly affect the exports and trade activities in the country.

As the dollar reached a record high on November 30 other currencies also skyrocketed against the Pakistani rupee. During November inflation has doubled while the US dollar has appreciated by Rs5.06 in a single week. The rupee devaluation has already caused an increase in inflation and interest rate, affecting investment in the country. With a record high increase in the value of the dollar, the country’s debts were also soared to Rs760 billion.

According to the official statement of Ministry of Finance issued after the board’s meeting, the Board is of the view that the present developments are mainly explained by market demand-supply gap of dollar liquidity on the one hand and more underlying structural impediments on the other. In principle, the parity should be at their competitive-enhancing levels. Accordingly, after the latest adjustments, it is now more reflective of the economy’s medium-term needs and market conditions. The Board also anticipates that the short-term conditions on the exchange rate front are likely to normalise. Particularly, availability of deferred oil facilities and the recent decline in the international oil prices is expected to reduce pressures in the Pakistan foreign exchange market in the short-term. Moreover, the bilateral flows would close the financing gap for FY19. These positive developments will build FX reserves in the coming months.

According to the ministry, the fiscal policy, the external sector and the recent steps in monetary policy were discussed during the meeting.

While reviewing fiscal policy, the Board noted that the fiscal deficit for the first quarter of FY19 turned out to be 1.4 per cent of GDP. The Board appreciated the authorities adjustment plan for fiscal consolidation. The impact of fiscal consolidation measures implemented in the recent months would be visible from the second quarter of the current financial year. This consolidation is an important element of the homegrown adjustment plan and will play an integral part for ensuring economic stability. The need for continued effort to ensure revenue generation and expenditure controls was emphasised in the meeting.

As far as the financing of the fiscal deficit is concerned, the Board discussed the inflationary and monetary impact of reliance on SBP financing during the current financial year. The fiscal authorities explained that the financing mix is expected to record a substantial improvement as most of the external financing would be realised from January 2019 onwards, which will result in a lesser reliance on banking sector borrowing.

Turning to the external sector the Coordination Board was apprised that current account is visibly responding to the measures taken since Jan 2018. In the first four months, of the current financial year, non-oil imports witnessed a decline of 4 per cent compared to the high growth of 25 per cent over the same period last year. Remittances have recorded a substantial growth in FY19, while exports have shown growth of 4 per cent. On the exchange rate front, the Board discussed the recent volatility in the Pakistani rupee parity.

On recent changes in monetary policy, the Board was of the view that the stance is appropriate at current levels given the projections for inflation in FY19 and FY20. The real interest rates are significantly positive and would help manage aggregate demand and reduce output gap closer to sustainable levels. Going forward, the Board expects that the Monetary Policy Committee would continue to make data-driven decisions based on macroeconomic fundamentals.

The Coordination Board appreciated the authorities’ proposed adjustment plan to bring the current account to its norms soon while adjusting fiscal deficit gradually to a sustainable level. The authorities explained that they are focused on a growth model based on export promotion, productivity gains and structured institutional governance. The Board advised authorities to be more forthcoming with the stakeholders to explain the homegrown adjustment plan, which seems to be effectively working for the stabilisation of the economy.
 
.
Don’t blame Mexico. Their GDP is 1.2 trillion
 
.
Yes...also it will give much better correlation with nominal (real) where inflation (which is correlated with depreciation) is taken into account.

You can see the discrepancy between the two here:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=PK

(GDP of 300+ billion USD in 2017)

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD?locations=PK

(GDP of 240 billion USD in 2017....once effective inflation vis-a-vis USD taken into account)

That is pretty serious discrepancy (some 25% i.e 60 billion dollars)

India in comparison has both figures roughly the same (2.6 trillion USD) because it didnt follow such hard peg strategy that PMLN did this long and allow such over-valuing in the nominal side (i.e basically a govt induced subsidy transfer, leverage wise from capital account to current account...when neither has anywhere near the intrinsic sustainable elasticity to handle that in the mid to long term)

I.K admin biggest reform (in current window) must be indeed to allow much more free float market forces....and reduce the unnecessary loan burden (which is really cost of not doing reform internally to improve the performance/elasticity of the main economic levers...just like its bad to have one's arteries harden/plasticize).

Its actually quite a scam that PMLN identifies on the "right" in economic/political spectrum...this was a huge effective subsidy allocation in effect (argument being a market failure in the forex/PKR interaction realm).

@VCheng @django @Zibago @Hell hound @Major Sam @Chinese-Dragon @Oscar @Chak Bamu @Indus Pakistan @Joe Shearer @hellfire @Chinese-Dragon @GeraltofRivia @That Guy
The devaluation may sting a bit but in the long run it really can take burden off our reserves and we can go back to spending money on actual infrastructure prpjects sucsuch as expensive mega dams instead of just burning cash to keep dollar at a certan level
 
.
In nominal USD terms, yes the GDP will shrink with depreciation.

Nominal USD only has so much applicability though....it is important for foreign loans/ trade/investment etc....but PPP is lot more important for total physical consumption + social well being (since Pakistani public do not do their day to day stuff with USD, but with PKR).

Hopefully next few years will illustrate value of PPP over nominal to many Pakistani members here.

But is PPP model valid for import based economy like Pakistan ? Pakistan has almost no industrial base and has to import almost everything.
 
.
The devaluation may sting a bit but in the long run it really can take burden off our reserves and we can go back to spending money on actual infrastructure prpjects sucsuch as expensive mega dams instead of just burning cash to keep dollar at a certan level

The most crucial thing is, Pakistan doesnt have a lot of US dollar at hand in the first place and there is not much business being conducted with their US counterpart using US dollar in which made pegging business by Pakistani central bank is very expensive, in case your central bank must bought US treasuries and selling them to maintain PKR value is cant be done without large US dollar reserves.

But i dont give advice to suddenly going free floating markets as it will dragging down Pakistan economy as a whole severely by causing disrupt in confidence at market (showing Pakistan gov. throwing white towel), sudden devaluing of PKR nominal at high rates will bring harms as it will made import very expensive and inflation rates growing higher considering much of Pakistani industry and retail markets is very depends on import products.
 
.
The most crucial thing is, Pakistan doesnt have a lot of US dollar at hand in the first place and there is not much business being conducted with their US counterpart using US dollar in which made pegging business by Pakistani central bank is very expensive, in case your central bank must bought US treasuries and selling them to maintain PKR value is cant be done without large US dollar reserves.

But i dont give advice to suddenly going free floating markets as it will dragging down Pakistan economy as a whole severely by causing disrupt in confidence at market (showing Pakistan gov. throwing white towel), sudden devaluing of PKR nominal at high rates will bring harms as it will made import very expensive and inflation rates growing higher considering much of Pakistani industry and retail markets is very depends on import products.
No ome is goimg for the free floating market in such a hung parliament its just that the strict foolish models of the past wont be replicated the Pkr will fall but at a more manageable pace and will float in the direction of our economic state
 
.
But is PPP model valid for import based economy like Pakistan ? Pakistan has almost no industrial base and has to import almost everything.
this is untrue Pakistan has sufficient industrial setup for our needs and some exports, the problem is that importers who are importing comparables/ substitutes and not diffentiated products. This hurts our industries as first they eat through local companies market share and also because these importers do not have to suffer through the preliminary cost of starting a business.
 
.
But is PPP model valid for import based economy like Pakistan ? Pakistan has almost no industrial base and has to import almost everything.

It is valid depending on what you are talking/comparing.

If we are just talking for example pure final consumption quantity (in total or per capita) then its quite good.

If we talking about it for foreign exchange situation/trade/investment...its quite bad. Pakistan is facing lot of issues in this sector now....so yah PPP does not really enter argument for those....you cant convert PPP amount to a US dollar to pay off a loan for example. What you can do is formalise more of your economy and integrate more with the world economy etc.....so this effectively happens by other means.
 
.
This must be the "every child is born with enough food to feed him" belief at work. It doesn't really work like that in reality.

Man ... enough food or not child are getting food and clothes ... furthermore the population of workers are also increasing ... in a rising population ... deflation is next to impossible .... there can be lower or higher growth but dwflation really difficult ... furthermore there are no basis for such assumptions ... government spwnding has declined but on the other hand foreign spending are increasing ...

In nominal USD terms, yes the GDP will shrink with depreciation.

Nominal USD only has so much applicability though....it is important for foreign loans/ trade/investment etc....but PPP is lot more important for total physical consumption + social well being (since Pakistani public do not do their day to day stuff with USD, but with PKR).

Hopefully next few years will illustrate value of PPP over nominal to many Pakistani members here.

Nominal GDP is nothing ... actual figure is real GDP ... due to rupee devaluation nominal GDP is bound to decline but who in the world quotes nominal GDP as it represents a fake picture ?
 
. .
Not sure how the author concludes that nominal GDP can shrink in Pakistan. Not saying it is impossible but it is highly unlikely unless Pakistan is under IMF’s austerity measures, which will send the economy to shock.
 
.
Not sure how the author concludes that nominal GDP can shrink in Pakistan. Not saying it is impossible but it is highly unlikely unless Pakistan is under IMF’s austerity measures, which will send the economy to shock.

In USD terms it will shrink next year. PKR is down by 35% this year. Even if we consider it will maintain the current rate and considering Pakistan nominal growth rate at 12.5 (Inflation+real growth rate), it's economy will shrink by almost 20%
 
.
In USD terms it will shrink next year. PKR is down by 35% this year. Even if we consider it will maintain the current rate and considering Pakistan nominal growth rate at 12.5 (Inflation+real growth rate), it's economy will shrink by almost 20%
All that stuff is sorted out the dollar will stabilized at 122.
 
.
Yes...also it will give much better correlation with nominal (real) where inflation (which is correlated with depreciation) is taken into account.

You can see the discrepancy between the two here:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=PK

(GDP of 300+ billion USD in 2017)

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD?locations=PK

(GDP of 240 billion USD in 2017....once effective inflation vis-a-vis USD taken into account)

That is pretty serious discrepancy (some 25% i.e 60 billion dollars)

India in comparison has both figures roughly the same (2.6 trillion USD) because it didnt follow such hard peg strategy that PMLN did this long and allow such over-valuing in the nominal side (i.e basically a govt induced subsidy transfer, leverage wise from capital account to current account...when neither has anywhere near the intrinsic sustainable elasticity to handle that in the mid to long term)

I.K admin biggest reform (in current window) must be indeed to allow much more free float market forces....and reduce the unnecessary loan burden (which is really cost of not doing reform internally to improve the performance/elasticity of the main economic levers...just like its bad to have one's arteries harden/plasticize).

Its actually quite a scam that PMLN identifies on the "right" in economic/political spectrum...this was a huge effective subsidy allocation in effect (argument being a market failure in the forex/PKR interaction realm).

@VCheng @django @Zibago @Hell hound @Major Sam @Chinese-Dragon @Oscar @Chak Bamu @Indus Pakistan @Joe Shearer @hellfire @Chinese-Dragon @GeraltofRivia @That Guy

The bottom line is that the "real" value of the PKR, in the long run, will always be determined by the fundamentals of the Pakistani economy (or rather their enduring weaknesses), and not by short term politically motivated manipulation. My estimates of a 10% annual decline in value over the long term is likely to remain robust for the foreseeable future, and that any annual growth rate below 7% will leave people overall poorer every year, with the shortfalls accumulating on top of those already accrued.

Them be the facts without any spin.
 
.
Not sure how the author concludes that nominal GDP can shrink in Pakistan. Not saying it is impossible but it is highly unlikely unless Pakistan is under IMF’s austerity measures, which will send the economy to shock.

Well when devaluation (against USD) is higher rate in a year than the total nominal growth (in local currency)...nominal GDP (when measured in USD) will shrink. As measured in PKR, yes it will require much more than devaluation but major internal recessionary pressures (which are unlikely).

I refer you to Indian GDP as measured in current USD in time periods 2007 - 2008 and 2011 - 2013 and compare that with the constant dollar (effective relative inflation indexing rather than following only forex pressure) measure in same time periods:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?locations=IN

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD?locations=IN

The inverse (when massive expansion of current dollar measurement compared to constant dollar) also applies to same argument.
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom