In one of my previous posts, I gave example of two women who are held under active and continuous mind control. I am aware that solilmavis has been under mind control for more than a decade. I am sure there are more than a hundreds other women like that under active mind control. Now I would like to ask good and thoughtful Americans who are not in denial why these women are being persecuted. Are these women terrorists? involved in such grave anti-American activities that they had to be dealt using extra-judicial means of retarding other humans. And this activity had to continue for more than a decade. And American agencies plan that it would continue for all the life time of these women and other men under active mind control?
Such gravely dangerous anti-American terrorist women?
No because the criteria is to retard the intelligent people of other nations and Americans who disagree or belong to communities not in power. Finding neuro-transmitters that could make people succeed especially in people of other nations is a possible warrant that they would be retarded by some American agencies. These are otherwise very good human beings.
I am so thoroughly surprised how so many Americans tolerate and sympathize with people of these agencies. I think it is absolutely animal practice to retard other human beings and I would like to call such people animals since I do not want to disgrace the word human to apply to these animal people. But it still fails me to understand how these cruel and inhuman people are accepted, followed and sometimes even praised in American society. Many people approve their machinations and in fact there are a large number of American people machinating with these animals so that this cruelty on other humans could continue. Is this a failure of good elements in American society?
Again appealing to intelligence of American people, I would like to ask how reasonable it is when some agents in these intelligence agencies who would otherwise possibly be on minimum pay in their society are making upwards of 50 millions of dollars? Do you give this kind of money even to your noble prize winners who have actually served American people and broader humanity and made Americans proud. This is typical of American defence department where so many corrupt people are continuously minting money. I believe that American defence department has to defend every rightful interest of American people in the most human possible way. But his is a bloated, and corrupt enterprise that many times follows the interests of special groups even when its actions conflict with American interests. I believe that American defence department needs intelligent and good human leadership and other talent that would actually protect the right American interests without resorting to inhuman and cruel activities especially towards peaceful and good civilians of other nations.
Many times I think America is gradually moving towards the death of American dream when we see intelligent black men and women (among others) nauseating to some people in American society being retarded by these special agencies. Is this not death of American dream where many rich and powerful people or groups retard intelligent people from less privileged communities in order to keep the composition of American elite the same. I believe that this should be grave cause of concern to American people who actually care about their country whether such activities could be justified in the America they belong to. If good Americans do believe that such activities must end, they must force their government that extra-judicial retarding of Americans and foreigners, based on whims of some people who have assumed this decision making role on their own claiming they are doing it on the behalf of American people and for the good of American people, must end forever. Any such extra-judicial decision making role to retard others by some supposedly intelligent people is prone to hurt American society and rest of the world forever and I am sure most good Americans would agree that it must end.
About other things that are going on here.
I had submitted my paper to arxiv.org thinking that it would get a wider audience and then there would be little chances of plagiarism or arganized and orchestrated stealing of my work by anyone since many people would get to know who did the original research. I do not know what happened. I still think that arXiv.org administration might have made a mistake but these emails describe what is going on now. Let the people think on their own what is going on.
Subject: Re: [moderation #185062] arXiv:submit/1773408 removed
From: "Ahsan Amin" <ahsan.amin@infinitiderivatives.com>
Date: Sun, January 15, 2017 4:29 am
To:
moderation@arxiv.org
Cc:
ahsan.amin@infinitiderivatives.com,
anan2999@yahoo.com,
ahsanamin2999@gmail.com
Priority: Normal
Options:
View Full Header |
Print |
Download this as a file
Dear arXiv moderation,
I submitted my paper on arxiv.org on Thursady 12th January. The paper was
placed on hold for a day. On Friday evening, when I logged into my account
I noticed that the status had changed from 'on hold' to 'submitted'. When
I looked at the definition of submitted, it told me that it was on line to
appear on the next release of papers. I was thinking that the paper would
appear in arxiv.org repository on Saturday. When it did not appear on
Saturday, I logged again and realized that arxiv submission schedules had
changed and according to new schedule the submitted paper would appear on
Sunday. The status remained submitted on Saturday as well when I logged
into the account. But this Sunday morning I received this email that my
paper had been removed. I would request arxiv administration to let me
know if there is an error that paper was removed after the status on my
account showed 'submitted' for two days.
I wish you a good day.
Kind regards,
Ahsan Amin
On Sat, January 14, 2017 2:10 pm, arXiv Moderation wrote:
> Your submission has been removed. Our volunteer moderators determined
> that your article does not contain sufficient original or substantive
> research to merit inclusion within arXiv. Please note that our moderators
> are not referees and provide no reviews with such decisions. For in-depth
> reviews of your work you would have to seek feedback from another forum.
>
> Please do not resubmit this paper without contacting arXiv moderation and
> obtaining a positive response. Resubmission of removed papers may result
> in the loss of your submission privileges.
>
> For more information on our moderation policies see:
>
>
>
http://arxiv.org/help/moderation
>
>
> --
> arXiv moderation
>
>