Loss of East Pakistan is not a military, but a political failure: Pakistan's outgoing army chief

[TheSolution]

Think of Bangladesh with a Hindu population percentage of 30%

Things had to be done

That would have been a significant security risk for Bangladesh, not only today but also in the future.

They would be the perfect candidates for RAW moles, inside agents and fifth columnists to infiltrate top levels.

And think about how much you hate Razakars, in the future once India's global influence is more prominent and their indigenous R&D is up-to-par, they may move towards actualising expansionist plans in the subcontinent, these Hindus would easily serve as future Razakars for Akhand Bharat Hindu rahstra.

@BananaRepublicUK

Who last time I checked were humans.

Yes but technically that's not indiscriminate because they were discriminating between religion.

Also read above how it helped you in the long-run.

 

[hussain0216]

That would have been a significant security risk for Bangladesh, not only today but also in the future.

They would be the perfect candidates for RAW moles, inside agents and fifth columnists to infiltrate top levels.

And think about how much you hate Razakars, in the future once India's global influence is more prominent and their indigenous R&D is up-to-par, they may move towards actualising expansionist plans in the subcontinent, these Hindus would easily serve as future Razakars for Akhand Bharat Hindu rahstra.

@BananaRepublicUK

Yes but technically that's not indiscriminate because they were discriminating between religion.

Also read above how it helped you in the long-run.

Exactly what people keep forgetting is that India and China have a population of 1.4 billion EACH


third is USA with about 330 million



If you subtract Pakistani population from India, you still get left with 1.2 billion Indians!!!!!!!!!


By right, with that MASSIVE population India will see some development due to the fact that they have this massive internal market


The hindutva threat to the Muslims of South Asia is very real and we need to prepare for it

We need to pull China into South Asia to counter balance India

We need to prepare militarily ourselves




Every which way you look at it, getting rid of the Hindus is vital

Indian Muslims themselves need to start relocating within India to create vast areas of Muslim majority to safeguard against hindutva extremism

 

[TheSolution]

Exactly what people keep forgetting is that India and China have a population of 1.4 billion EACH


third is USA with about 330 million



If you subtract Pakistani population from India, you still get left with 1.2 billion Indians!!!!!!!!!


By right, with that MASSIVE population India will see some development due to the fact that they have this massive internal market


The hindutva threat to the Muslims of South Asia is very real and we need to prepare for it

We need to pull China into South Asia to counter balance India

We need to prepare militarily ourselves




Every which way you look at it, getting rid of the Hindus is vital

Indian Muslims themselves need to start relocating within India to create vast areas of Muslim majority to safeguard against hindutva extremism

India wouldn't touch Bangladesh unless Pakistan is out of the picture, and until it has global influence to convince the world to ignore everything. Then it will use historical grounds to claim it.

If Pakistan is gone, the risk continues to grow for Bangladesh and becomes a reality, and same for what's left of Pakistan, because the Indians are still mad about the partition and see it as their rightful land.

Of course these risks will become higher very far into the future, probably past our lifetimes, but it's a risk nonetheless.

 

[BananaRepublicUK]

That would have been a significant security risk for Bangladesh, not only today but also in the future.

They would be the perfect candidates for RAW moles, inside agents and fifth columnists to infiltrate top levels.

And think about how much you hate Razakars, in the future once India's global influence is more prominent and their indigenous R&D is up-to-par, they may move towards actualising expansionist plans in the subcontinent, these Hindus would easily serve as future Razakars for Akhand Bharat Hindu rahstra.

@BananaRepublicUK

Yes but technically that's not indiscriminate because they were discriminating between religion.

Also read above how it helped you in the long-run.

Please see my threads and posts on our “liberation war”.

It was actually a civil war between Hindus and Biharis.

Bengali Muslims suffered very little hence why so many are pro-Pakistan.

Pakistani military targeted Hindus with help of Bihari civilians.

RAW in turn targeted Biharis with the help of Hindus.

Both were threats to Bengali Muslims. But both cancelled each other out.

Bengali Muslims have always been a cohesive bunch. Explains why we have managed to curve out a country bang middle of India.

We succeeded where others failed.

 

[TheSolution]

Please see my threads and posts on our “liberation war”.

It was actually a civil war between Hindus and Biharis.

Bengali Muslims suffered very little hence why so many are pro-Pakistan.

Pakistani military targeted Hindus with help of Bihari civilians.

RAW in turn targeted Biharis with the help of Hindus.

Both were threats to Bengali Muslims. But both cancelled each other out.

Bengali Muslims have always been a cohesive bunch. Explains why we have managed to curve out a country bang middle of India.

We succeeded where others failed.

So you essentially agree that the removal of vast Hindu populations was beneficial to Bangladesh in the long-run.

Best thing for Bangladesh is to build nukes for any future Indian aggression and learn whatever possible from the current Ukrainian battlefield.

India will try it's hardest to remove Pakistan, if it succeeds they will have a very high morale and motivation for their Akhand Bharat vision, certainly Bangladesh being a small state will be the next target, and a much easier one if they aren't aware of the risk.

 

[BananaRepublicUK]

So you essentially agree that the removal of vast Hindu populations was beneficial to Bangladesh in the long-run.

Best thing for Bangladesh is to build nukes for any future Indian aggression and learn whatever possible from the current Ukrainian battlefield.

India will try it's hardest to remove Pakistan, if it succeeds they will have a very high morale and motivation for their Akhand Bharat vision, certainly Bangladesh being a small state will be the next target, and a much easier one if they aren't aware of the risk.

Bangladesh is far too profitable for India to mess it up.

They will ofcourse will always try to bully us.

But we have been a cohesive unit for over 500 years.

Putin’s attack on Ukraine invited USA into Russia. USA will build permanent bases there once Putin is defeated.

Similarly, China will get permanent bases in BD if India ever attacks BD.

 

[sur]

You brought in PDM, who rewards you back with a slap in your face every now and then
By rejecting resignation of ministers whom you asked PDM to let go
Or by raising anti-army slogans at Asma Jahangir's memorial day
Or by Bilawal ridiculing you by saying that one should go ask you as you have real control




You were praised and given respect in last 3 years "لیکن تمھیں عزت راس نہیں آئی"

And today again, Bilawal whom you wanted to make a PM, lands a slap in your face by calling it a "military failure"

@ 0:58

 

[Imran Khan]

bajwa pulled it from his rear end

 

[Baburfromsarmarkand]

Crazy to think we couldnt hold on to our only non linked terriroty. The Brits managed to hold onto all of India with horses and telegrams while fighting wars in the Amercias and through two world wars This army is behind what the British were in 1800s.
I dont understand where the pride comes from.

 

[Arthur]

Yes. It was a political failure.

A political system manipulated and controlled by Army.

 

[Genghis khan1]

Bajw is famous ( not for good reasons). They even have his face in shadow govt infotainments news

 

[SIPRA]

bajwa pulled it from his rear end

Yes, because that was the only anatomical part of Mir Kanjar Bajwa, which was functional till end.

 

[Imran Khan]

Yes. It was a political failure.

A political system manipulated and controlled by Army.

there was marshal law in country since 1958 . so how it was political failure sir ?

 

[Homo Sapiens]

Yes. It was a political failure.

A political system manipulated and controlled by Army.

Bhutto would have been pacified easily had Army shown intention of transferring power to AL. It was Army who fueled political deadlock by encouraging Bhutto to refuse any settlement based on election results.

Plus, all the atrocities in Bangladesh, not done by Bhutto or any political party of West Pakistan, but Army.

 

[Jango]

And yesterday after retirement the kid on internship says it was a military failure!