Awesome
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2006
- Messages
- 22,023
- Reaction score
- 5
Neither violates India's constitution which says they are Secular.Just in case you didnt know, karunanidhi is a christian and his party dmk is atheistic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Neither violates India's constitution which says they are Secular.Just in case you didnt know, karunanidhi is a christian and his party dmk is atheistic.
Muslims have not claimed the god ever walked on Earth. So no talk about him being found in archaeological finds. Yes Muhammad came with the message that he exists and that message has ample proof...
There shows your little understanding of the Abrahamic faiths. Anyway Jesus's story is not about Noah's Arc (who preceeds Abraham). However evidence exists in the way Jesus was crucified, the references to Herod, the Roman Empire...
Correct, but they do base their archaeological expeditions to TEST the old testament. The old testament has been flimsy on the details but has accurate descriptions on the EXISTENCE of people like King David, the city of Sodom, Jerusalem, Emperor Hezeckiah, the Egyptian Pharoahs, Moses.
About your earlier talk of Noah's ark... Well the boat may not have been every found but there WAS a great flood, proved by science. When the 2nd Ice age ended, a lot of ice was melted away what do you think that must've done to the coastal areas?
The gods that have walked on Earth, at least some of their incidents should be verified? Is any bit of the Mahabharat verifiable?
Faith comes with the unseen, you are talking about a living god, his birth, his temple, where are they?
Without proof they can claim anything and demolish an old mosque?
And lose votes?
Neither violates India's constitution which says they are Secular.
Neither violates India's constitution which says they are Secular.
and who is talking about indian constitution? and who is talking about his right to say such a thing?
I was talking about the value you can attach to his statements in view of his and his party's stand, with also the side note that the whole of the setu samudram project is meant to give his party the benefit.
DMK is ruling tamilnadu and it is the state which will have benefit from the project.
Another point....people in the south generally don't worship Lord Ram...so most of them don't really give a damn what Karunanidhi has to say about him.
Dont even think of giving this IDIOTIC/falsified/ AIT propaganda statement. Check the name of the town from where Kalam comes from. I am from south, so please spare me the bullsh*t
Get out of the propoganda by the communist education since the 70's and dont speak this cr*pSheesh chill dude...from what I know most people who worship lord ram on a daily basis are from North India.
why is an administrator trying to throw flame-baits?
APJ Abdul Kalam - hometown - RAMeshwaram
Aryan Invasion Theory
Get out of the propoganda by the communist education since the 70's and dont speak this cr*p
That doesnt mean they dont worship Ram is the point you are not getting and who the hell told you worshipping Ram is equating support to BJP?The people of Bengal worship Durga. They won't go up in flames..and from what I can see...are not going up in flames about the ram issue.
I mean comeon...they've rejected BJP for the last 20 years. What more do you want?
So what is your point? How do you think Karunanidhi got elected if the people under him are so touchy about the Ram issue?
What about the aryan invasion theory?
That doesnt mean they dont worship Ram is the point you are not getting and who the hell told you worshipping Ram is equating support to BJP?
You need a grounds up political workers to get votes and which BJP doesnt have in the south.
You really need to know the history of tamilnadu politics for this and how they were "communized", the history the politics have with cinema, the dalit struggle and the symbols they chose and how both the parties DMK and AIADMK both are from the same communist background to learn it. and I do not have the patience to teach you.
AIT is a cr*p sprouted out by the british so that the south and north can be seen as two different countries by the british and which they devised during their -divide and rule- theory. This is not the right forum for it and I do not want to take you through it. India-forums or some such forum discusses it, you can take your questions there and you are sure to invite responses.
But isn't that what they taught us in school?
New Recruit