What's new

LOL - Global Fire Power 2015 List is a Joke!

Once again to simulate a war scenario, we must apply law of the jungle. It is true that if France and UK start a war against India today with modern international law and body, they will lose quite easily. Russia will help India or perhaps even us, as well. That is why I am saying that we have to apply jungle law to simulate a war. This way, nobody is involved except the two countries that are fighting. British are capable of launching expeditionary troop to conquer all the way to India border. Though it is really difficult to gauge the industrial military strength of Britain/France now in peace time. I am sure they can, especially Britain, to defeat India. Let not forget, the common wealth nation will most likely aid Britain to defeat India.


Lol :lol:
Now you are living in a foolsparadise.
Did you actually think wewill just wait and watch?
About industrial might during war time.We have huge industrial resources.
When an foregn nation try to intimidate us.You can see therise of patriotism among Indians.You dont have any idea about that.
We dont need anyones help.Except Pakistan .I dont see any Comminwealth help to Britian.
 
.
If we were to simulate a war scenario between any two countries, a duel so to speak, then first we need to throw out all political correctness junks, international law and governing body, and simply go back to the law of the jungle like those in 19th and 20th century. In this scenario, it is indeed possible for Britain and France to defeat India. We will ask why I am assure. I never look at current firepower as a meant for real war strength considered that in peace time, everyone is happy acting nice and civilized. This is to be expected. What matter most is the knowledge of indigenous weapons. That is one of the reason why British and France empire can conquer others. They have the industrial knowledge and weaponry know know to make as much as needed to conquer others. While France/Britain are not the same power of 20th century, their industrial know-how is still very strong as evidence by their tank, aircraft, and nuclear tech arsenal. The only concern for Britain/France is manpower but at 64mil and 66mil, respectively, it is enough population to generate offensive power to conquer others. Once again, you must remember that I am talking about law of the jungle.

Neither are Russia and China superior to UK and France in technology, industrial knowledge or weaponry.

So for you the top three are

1) US 2) UK 3) France.

You are being naive, if UK and France are number 2 and 3. Even UK and France wouldn't agree with you
 
.
Yes. If UK or France is serious about conquering other countries again, especially if British unleash their imperial smell, then they can defeat India. Though, only if other world power close their eyes.


how will they do that please facts buddy no more Chinese no guarantee crap
 
.
So what ?
You can give ca thousands of lame excuses .But at the end half of your land become another nation.
Lol:lol:

Still didn't become a part of india? And to begin with Bangalis had nothing in common with us apart from religion .. And the initial idea was a separate bangali country to begin with.

Lion.:rofl:.We supported rebels because your atriocities cause civilian inflow and pressurised our economy.Still we didnt invove.Then you made a pathetic Israel imitation called Operation Chenghis Khan.Then we began to act


BS... Read books by your own authors or better yet your former COAS Vk singhs .. indian soldiers wearing lunges and shouting joy bangla when they greeted their own GOC.. india was directly involved since March... N the conspiracy since years.
48 was a war between Pakistan and Kashmir King.Thanks to Nehru .We didnt retake GB,Azad Kashmir etc. after we involved .

Sure whatever gives you through a wet night .


65 Another pathetic attempt to grab Kashmir.Ended up in defending Lahore.

You can give a tens of thousands of excuses .But at the end world didnt take your excuses.And we are not equal like those stupid rankings by Chinese member.

Another example of bastardisation of history ... Actions in run of Kutch,GB sectors forced us to launch covert operations in JK (covert- not invasion).


And the newspapers from that era pretty much covered it all... And that my little indian frnd is why you don't celebrate 48,65 or 63 for that matter.

We are more powerful than Aussie is correct buddy, just look at the number of their tanks and military personnel. But I am also surprised we can be number 12, higher than Pakistan and Egypt :D. But I think the analysis is talking about if long war happens and the country is in the defensive position. Look at Iraq and Vietnam....? USA can beat Iraq that was so powerful before, and USA had long war with Vietnam and lost after years fighting there. It is difficult to beat a nation which has many mountain and forest plus big population.

But I think someone hack GFP, How can Singapore be stronger than Saudi :lol: :lol:

Iraq as a paper tiger .. Monkey model tanks,export model jets n shitty russian missiles and BADLY trained military to top it all.


Egypt = no BVR,no u see water capability,not much of a navy ...


Pakistan : yeah sure .
 
.
Still didn't become a part of india? And to begin with Bangalis had nothing in common with us apart from religion .. And the initial idea was a separate bangali country to begin with.




BS... Read books by your own authors or better yet your former COAS Vk singhs .. indian soldiers wearing lunges and shouting joy bangla when they greeted their own GOC.. india was directly involved since March... N the conspiracy since years.


Sure whatever gives you through a wet night .




Another example of bastardisation of history ... Actions in run of Kutch,GB sectors forced us to launch covert operations in JK (covert- not invasion).


And the newspapers from that era pretty much covered it all... And that my little indian frnd is why you don't celebrate 48,65 or 63 for that matter.


Lol :lol:
You did it again another lame excuse.
BD was separate ,this ,that and didnt had any problem to rule them for 24 years:haha: :rofl:

But we involved only afterOperation Chenghis Right ?.Another excuse cant change that fact.

Another lame excuse ?You came to attack us in the name of Operation Gibraltar.And we reacted .

6.1 ft is so little.Level of stupidity. :rofl:
 
.
Lol :lol:
You did it again another lame excuse.
BD was separate ,this ,that and didnt had any problem to rule them for 24 years:haha: :rofl:

But we involved only afterOperation Chenghis Right ?.Another excuse cant change that fact.

Another lame excuse ?You came to attack us in the name of Operation Gibraltar.And we reacted .

6.1 ft is so little.Level of stupidity. :rofl:


Your own chief of army bust your claim .

Read a book or news papers from 65 (or do you want me to post em - which I have several times)

Yeah sunny everybody specially india is over 6 onthe internet ... Figured that one out long back.
 
.
Your own chief of army bust your claim .

Read a book or news papers from 65 (or do you want me to post em - which I have several times)

Yeah sunny everybody specially india is over 6 onthe internet ... Figured that one out long back.

Army Chief may be right.
But India involved only after Operation Chenghis Khan.Right ?
Can you refute that point ?


Go and check google .You can see the average height of keralites.Above 6 ft is normal in this state.
 
.
Army Chief may be right.
But India involved only after Operation Chenghis Khan.Right ?
Can you refute that point ?

Unless operation "CK" was launched before March 1971?? Or India had not planned the invasion n insurgency ?(also on record).

Go and check google .You can see the average height of keralites.Above 6 ft is normal in this state.

:lol: go check your national average height.
 
.
Lmao.

They "updated" it few weeks ago..and now they "updated" it again and changed everything?

Every year, the list gets changed...

Indonesia is a mighter military power than Australia?

Vietnam is more powerful than Saudi Royal Forces armed with F-15Es (most advance) and Eurofighters? Abram tanks and what not?

Poland is stronger than Pakistan?

Thailand's military power outweigh Iran and Sweden?


:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:

GFP is a joke
Things to keep in mind:

• Nuclear capability is NOT taken into account
• Geographical factors influence every final GFP ranking
• Ranking does not solely rely on total number of weapons available
• Natural resource reliance (use/production) is taken into account
• Land-locked nations are NOT penalized for lack of a standing navy
• Naval powers ARE penalized for limited naval capabilities
• Current economic health for each country is taken into account
• Current political/military leadership is NOT taken into account
 
.
In law of jungle only number matters and technology never happens so do you still thinks they outnumbers us.I think Britain and France have benefit of International laws and support of other countries.Weapons need one more things Economy.UK and France is loosing finances and Investments to India and China. They have technology but they don't have money to use that technology. Indian defense budget is increasing every year due to its economic expansion. India is buying their developed technology.Why do you think they are selling their cutting edge technologies to India because Indian money is pumping oxygen in their economy.
Like I said, peace time number don't mean much. At the end of the day, how much you can produce during war time is more important than anything else. London and Paris are world class city and have mature financial institution. People invest in those city with long term goal. People invest in India mainly for a quick short buck.
 
.
Like I said, peace time number don't mean much. At the end of the day, how much you can produce during war time is more important than anything else. London and Paris are world class city and have mature financial institution. People invest in those city with long term goal. People invest in India mainly for a quick short buck.

are you really living in past or anything.Sorry pal lets ignore it now
 
.
Neither are Russia and China superior to UK and France in technology, industrial knowledge or weaponry.

So for you the top three are

1) US 2) UK 3) France.

You are being naive, if UK and France are number 2 and 3. Even UK and France wouldn't agree with you
Russia and China have superior well-round industrial capability. Franch/UK have some niches field that they are ahead but overall we beat them quite convincingly such as missile tech, drone, nuclear, and even aircraft. Both Russia/China are capable for making and already making 5th gen aircraft, ICBM, and hypersonic missile, and arm drone (especially China).

So your attempt at saying Uk/France have superior military industry is not true.

how will they do that please facts buddy no more Chinese no guarantee crap
Look at the map. All countries head East are friendly or ally with them. They can station in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Oman and perhaps even Pakistan will allow UK/France to station base to attack India. Basically India is on the defensive side in this war and cannot afford to get out of their comfort zone.
 
.
Russia and China have superior well-round industrial capability. Franch/UK have some niches field that they are ahead but overall we beat them quite convincingly such as missile tech, drone, nuclear, and even aircraft. Both Russia/China are capable for making and already making 5th gen aircraft, ICBM, and hypersonic missile, and arm drone (especially China).

It amuses me the way you are trying to flatter yourself by taking china and russia both in single sentence.
 
.
It amuses me the way you are trying to flatter yourself by taking china and russia both in single sentence.

Chinese are catching up and eveneavinf Russians behind on several areas.

UAVs
Hypersonic missiles
5th gen fighters
Naval platforms
Etc
 
.
Look at the map. All countries head East are friendly or ally with them. They can station in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Oman and perhaps even Pakistan will allow UK/France to station base to attack India. Basically India is on the defensive side in this war and cannot afford to get out of their comfort zone.

but UK and France are friendly with India in today's scenario so you are using wrong scenario for your comment.Try some different scenario
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom