What's new

Liveability poll: Karachi 135th among bottom ranking cities

Neo

RETIRED

New Recruit

Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

LONDON (June 09 2009): Vancouver is the world's easiest city to live in while Harare is the toughest, a survey said Monday putting Europe and north America at the top while many African and Asian cities struggle behind. Canadian and Australian cities hold six of the top 10 slots in the Economist Intelligence Unit's liveability poll, which ranks cities on five factors:health-care, stability, culture and environment, education and infrastructure.

The bottom rankings are occupied by a swathe of Asian and African cities: Manila in 108th, New Delhi in joint 114th spot with Cairo, Mumbai in 120th, Nairobi 122nd and Lusaka 126th. Cities scoring below 50 percent - which "present daily challenges to living standards" according to the authors - include Tehran in 129th place, Karachi, Pakistan in 135th and Lagos in 136th. The bottom three are Algiers, Dhaka and Harare.

"At the other end of the ranking, most of the poorest-performing locations are in Africa or Asia, where civil instability and poor infrastructure present significant challenges," said the survey's authors. In ratings ranging from zero (intolerable) to 100 percent (ideal), Vancouver scores 98 percent, "benefiting from strong Canadian infrastructure," while Harare languishes on 37.5 "thanks to the unfolding crisis in Zimbabwe."

At the top end of the global easy-living scale, Vienna is in second place followed by Melbourne, Toronto, Perth, Calgary, Helsinki and Geneva, with Sydney and Zurich in joint ninth place. The Japanese city of Osaka is just outside the top 10 on 13th place, and Tokyo is at joint 19th with Frankfurt.

European cities where life is generally not hard include Stockholm and Hamburg, Germany in 14th place, as well as Paris in 17th spot, Frankfurt in 19th, Copenhagen in 21st and Berlin in 22nd.

"With the exception of high scores in Australasia and some Asian centres, most of the better-scoring locations are based in the more developed regions of western Europe and North America," said the study. A string of US cities fill the rankings from 30th to 50th position - Washington DC in 35th place, Los Angeles in 48th - followed by another smattering of European conurbations: London is in 51st spot, Rome 52nd while Athens has western Europe's lowest showing in 63rd spot, on 81.2 percent.

Any city with a score above 80 percent "will have few, if any, challenges to living standards," said the survey. Lower down the orders come Moscow in 69th spot, Beijing in 76th, Johannesburg on joint 92nd with Brazil's Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo, and Bangkok in 100th place.
 
.
can't really argue with that canadian and australian cities are def the best in the world really modern,clean, no poverty, less congested and safer too even in comparison to european and U.S cities our south asian cities just don't compare oh well maybe one day they will.......
 
.
Delhi & bombay better than karachi? hmmm. not bad, however slim the margin is. But Chennai & Hyderabad much better than delhi or bombay.
 
.
canadian ... cities are def the best in the world really modern,clean, no poverty, less congested and safer too even in comparison to european and U.S cities
Poverty is a problem everywhere in the world, including Canadian cities (especially ones with higher population densities, such as Toronto and Vancouver). Also, the congestion problem is pretty damn huge. I travel on Highway 401 for 1:15 hours every day to work, North America's busiest highway (I would argue that it is the world's busiest) and the whole "Green Revolution" bullcrap is taking funding away from road construction and repair and being poured into much less useful "Green Projects" such as subway construction. However, yes, compared to most cities in the world, European and American included, Toronto is heavenly, Alhamdulillah.

Delhi & bombay better than karachi? hmmm. not bad
Why, why, why is everything is a contest!

However, on a related topic, Bombay and Karachi are very similar in many ways, sharing the same sources of income, similar importance to their respective nations and even share many of the same problems (with violence, minorities, class-polarization, culture-clash etc). Also, they are both run by gangsters (in our case, he doesn't even live in the country and still manages to poison it).
 
.
Why, why, why is everything is a contest!

However, on a related topic, Bombay and Karachi are very similar in many ways, sharing the same sources of income, similar importance to their respective nations and even share many of the same problems (with violence, minorities, class-polarization, culture-clash etc). Also, they are both run by gangsters (in our case, he doesn't even live in the country and still manages to poison it).

It's not a contest but a comparison with ur neigbouring cities. Why should it be taken as a contest always? Can't one just compare and give an observation? just like u compare bombay with karachi.
 
.
I don't see how New Delhi can be a lowly 114th. And where's Bangalore on the list? It's probably the best Indian city to live in.
 
.
Yes true,bangalore must had been there....and also hyderabad.....both are cleaner than delhi.....though not been there to chennai....
 
.
These kinda polls don't say much!

Cities are far too complicated to put on polls!
 
.
"karachi is similar to bombay ,lahore similar to delhi ",I am very familiar with this comparision.it might have spread from word of mouth from during partition itself ;)

Best City in India to live for a IT Proffessionals/Rich People is Bangalore.High expense is the reason to tell so.
While Bombay,Hyderabad(indian city),Ahmedabad,Madras,Kolkata are not relying on IT alone. Heck ,I heard reason to prefer Banglore by some companies are that the city is having a cool climate :P
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom