Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
In all major democracies parties have a right to protest against policies of govt and/or demand resignations we saw that in South Korea recentlyI just gave you several examples of how economy stabilized under democracy went to worse after military took over, not to mention separation from East Pakistan as well as allowing the birth of TTP and MQM to go rampage on the economical port of Pakistan?
Even today, democracy under PMLN is stabilizing the economy that was left in mess due to military takeover for the last 15 years.
Democracy is under threat all the times because of history of military takeover. In fact, Pakistan had more military takeover than rest of the world combined. To the extent, Pakistan military have ruled Pakistan more than democracy. Even if you calculate democracy, it ruled few terms at best - not given proper run to be properly groomed hence stuck with only political outfits.
Military takeover means no investment on democracy nor economy.
Even under Musharraf, the funding from USA saved Pakistan from the bankruptcy, and despite of handsome funding, yet did nothing for the economy of Pakistan, no sign of economical projects at all. No assets, no economy. If anything, he lets the only economical port aka Karachi goes in ruin by allowing his favorite MQM to go rampage all over Karachi, thus setting the economy of Pakistan backward to 15 years and more.
I guess we will never find proof since Imran Khan fired his accountability team for exposing corruption from within his party.
So you have no clue how Musharraf ran Pakistan to the ground which in result produced side effects as we are seeing in Pakistan today? PMLN just got back. It was Musharraf where birth of TTP occurred ended up killing more than 50,000 innocent people in Pakistan, allowed MQM to destroy Karachi from progressive economical port to all-time worse now. Even today, Musharraf justifies his support for MQM and maintains pro-stances of MQM.
I just gave you examples of anarchism and that is not threatening democracy to you? corrupt leader that is elected by mass majority of Pakistan is threatening democracy, rightfully claimed leadership with the majority votes in the election day as every fabric beings of democracy.
Imran Khan, fired his own accountability team for exposing corruption from within his party, challenging mass-majority democratic elected government by endorsing anarchism through hosting cities and towns as hostage, forcibly closing down local businesses against their wills, burning infrastructures everywhere ends up costing Pakistan more than 500 billion rupees, not to mention instigating racial wars which could lead to civil war - thus military takeover in effect is not threatening democracy to you?
I mean one example is enough where Imran Khan is imposing his anarchism against the wills of Pakistan and mass-majority democratic elected government. Imran Khan is going to decide who should be PM and not the nation that is rightfully their rights as they choose in the election day?
I guess you and me have different definition of what is threatening democracy and what is not.
You want to know real anarchism
http://pmln.org/protesters-wreak-havoc-across-punjab/
http://blogs.tribune.com.pk/tag/pml-n-workers-attack-supreme-court/
https://en.dailypakistan.com.pk/pakistan/pml-n-workers-barge-into-khyber-pakhtunkhwa-assembly/
http://www.brecorder.com/general-ne...n-accused-of-killing-workers/?date=2016-05-14
Being elected doesnot make you god
Pakistan is not Nazi Germany or Modi,s India you are still accountable for your wrong deeds and even if one person points out something wrong by you if his argument is right you cant use a shitty argunent i was elected to use it as a get out of jail free card and silence him
Sharif purchased the flats in 90,s before he was exiled all his arguments fail now he us lying to people you have no right to tell others that they should not criticize him for mega billion rs transfer of cash from Pakistan
On issue of corruption by pti you have nab,fia go and open cases against him you are the govt
The root of what happened in BD lies in our slow response to Bhola cyclone,Agratala conspiracy,govt policies and our geographical limits blaming army is an easy way out btw the argument that a military regime doesnot attract investment is something only a super inward looking noon leagi would say Egypt is a perfect rebuttal to your claim(btw i am agains mil law i believe in real democracy not a psuedo one)
Musharaf did nothing fir the economy is the lie of the century we had record construction during his era i saw Islamabad and Lahore transform right before my eyes in his era his tenure,s end was marjed by the global oil price hike which resulted in us being trapped in cycle of circular debt i know you love pmpn but dont lie ok his era saw almost 6% growth and many say that roots of cpec go back to his era
On issue of mqm well they are a reality we have to accept for Karachi to grow using the same shitty argument you use to justify corruption by pmln people of Karachi support them we can launch operation agaimst them but mqm as a party will exist and will continue to rake in votes from Karachites its upto us do we want to co-operate with them or just ignore them and rule Karachi by outsidersoutsiders
On issue of TTP blaming Musharaf for ttp is super simplification of a complex problem ttp was formed because we sided wuth america he didnt invent ttp and i do remember we had sermons in mosques by ttp in 2005-7 in Islamabadi Mosques which are now pro pmln
Would we be in better position if we hadnt sided with US post 9-11?
Maybe but was it possible for us to say no when we were in such a bind back then if you ubderstand our relation you would know that at best we couldve limited our role as a transit route only which was what we shouldve done back then
Btw racial wars are stopping free movement from a province,stopping wheat movement and chanting jaag punjabi jaagI just gave you several examples of how economy stabilized under democracy went to worse after military took over, not to mention separation from East Pakistan as well as allowing the birth of TTP and MQM to go rampage on the economical port of Pakistan?
Even today, democracy under PMLN is stabilizing the economy that was left in mess due to military takeover for the last 15 years.
Democracy is under threat all the times because of history of military takeover. In fact, Pakistan had more military takeover than rest of the world combined. To the extent, Pakistan military have ruled Pakistan more than democracy. Even if you calculate democracy, it ruled few terms at best - not given proper run to be properly groomed hence stuck with only political outfits.
Military takeover means no investment on democracy nor economy.
Even under Musharraf, the funding from USA saved Pakistan from the bankruptcy, and despite of handsome funding, yet did nothing for the economy of Pakistan, no sign of economical projects at all. No assets, no economy. If anything, he lets the only economical port aka Karachi goes in ruin by allowing his favorite MQM to go rampage all over Karachi, thus setting the economy of Pakistan backward to 15 years and more.
I guess we will never find proof since Imran Khan fired his accountability team for exposing corruption from within his party.
So you have no clue how Musharraf ran Pakistan to the ground which in result produced side effects as we are seeing in Pakistan today? PMLN just got back. It was Musharraf where birth of TTP occurred ended up killing more than 50,000 innocent people in Pakistan, allowed MQM to destroy Karachi from progressive economical port to all-time worse now. Even today, Musharraf justifies his support for MQM and maintains pro-stances of MQM.
I just gave you examples of anarchism and that is not threatening democracy to you? corrupt leader that is elected by mass majority of Pakistan is threatening democracy, rightfully claimed leadership with the majority votes in the election day as every fabric beings of democracy.
Imran Khan, fired his own accountability team for exposing corruption from within his party, challenging mass-majority democratic elected government by endorsing anarchism through hosting cities and towns as hostage, forcibly closing down local businesses against their wills, burning infrastructures everywhere ends up costing Pakistan more than 500 billion rupees, not to mention instigating racial wars which could lead to civil war - thus military takeover in effect is not threatening democracy to you?
I mean one example is enough where Imran Khan is imposing his anarchism against the wills of Pakistan and mass-majority democratic elected government. Imran Khan is going to decide who should be PM and not the nation that is rightfully their rights as they choose in the election day?
I guess you and me have different definition of what is threatening democracy and what is not.