What's new

Life-size sculpture of Ranjit Singh to be unveiled at Lahore Fort

. .
Bhutto Zia Ayub Bacha Khan Altaf Nawaz Zardari Bugti and all other Peers and their mureeds are free to raise any temple any idol they want from their own money.

Azaadi hai !!
 
. . .
Bhutto Zia Ayub Bacha Khan Altaf Nawaz Zardari Bugti and all other Peers and their mureeds are free to raise any temple any idol they want from their own money.

Azaadi hai !!

There is a darbar of bhutto in Larkana every ppp minister visits the darbar after taking oath
 
.
There is a darbar of bhutto in Larkana every ppp minister visits the darbar after taking oath

theres a darbar of a cat stopping development work in Sindh too.

it all comes under freedom of religious rights
 
.
Source????

Search on google, by writing in Urdu script; you would get it. Poetry of Baba Bulley Shah, as published and printed by Packages Limited, has this solo verse. Even by having knowledge of poetic meter (Beher), one should know that it is not by Syed Waris Shah. Heer Waris Shah has totally different poetic meter (Beher).
 
.
Heer Waris Shah has totally different poetic meter (Beher)

If heer is the only poetic work of Waris Shah

theres a darbar of a cat stopping development work in Sindh too.

it all comes under freedom of religious rights

Chalo darbar main bili ki lash to hai na ham na to aisay darbar bhi dekhay hai jahan bili ki bhi lash nhi hai
 
. . .
it's said heer was a very pious woman but waris shah na ussay kisi waja sa badnam Kar Diya

You are mistaken. Syed Waris Shah is not the first one to write this tale. Far before him, it was versified by another Hindu poet, named Damodar, in a different poetic meter. Then, before Waris Shah, it was again written by another Muslim poet Shah Jahan Muqbal. In fact, Syed Waris Shah almost replicated the tale, as versified by Muqbal, in the same meter, as used by Muqbal. But Heer Waris Shah got the highest degree of repute, due to its poetic excellence.
 
. .
thats the point all are corrupt and equally no one is better. islam in subcontinent is due to sufis and saints. all rulers were beasts

Not true bro. A lot of them really did care about Islam, e.g Muhammad Ghauri died whilst making dua, Sher Shah Suri killed someone for oppressing Muslims in Madhya Pradesh (at their request), Qutub Uddin Aibek sought spiritual advice from Fariduddin Ganjshkar, Aurangzeb Alamgir created Fatawa e Alamgiri which is STILL taught today, etc.

why should i like because he has some punjabi generals. brother they all just plundered and looted the public. i dnt rate any ruler in sub continent

At least you're consistent with your logic.

He is not realated to hazaras he was related to hamayon and his grandsons only
You can say thet he belonged to same ethnic group which are hazaras and not hazaras are related to him both are different things
and those people who came with him from Central Asia never returned back so you can say their descendents are living in India or Pakistan but these hazaras are not related to him in anyway except for being from same race

Hazaras are Turco-Mongol-Persians. So was Babur, Humayun and Timur. This is why I say they're related.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom