What's new

Li-Fi to replace Wi-Fi in China ?

Hafizzz

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
5,041
Reaction score
0
Li-Fi to replace Wi-Fi in China ? | Business Standard

Chinese scientists have successfully developed a new cheaper way of getting connected to internet by using signals sent through light bulbs instead of radio frequencies as in 'Wi-Fi', a move expected to radically change process of online connectivity.

Four computers can be connected to internet through one- watt LED bulb using light as a carrier instead of traditional radio frequencies, as in Wi-Fi, said Chi Nan, an information technology professor with Shanghai's Fudan University.

Under the new discovery dubbed as 'Li-Fi', a light bulb with embedded microchips can produce data rates as fast as 150 megabits per second, which is speedier than the average broadband connection in China, said Chi, who leads a Li-Fi research team including scientists from the Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

The term Li-Fi was coined by Harald Haas from the University of Edinburgh in the UK and refers to a type of visible light communication technology that delivers a networked, mobile, high-speed communication solution in a similar manner as Wi-Fi.

With Li-Fi cost-effective as well as efficient, netizens should be excited to view 10 sample Li-Fi kits that will be on display at the China International Industry Fair that will kick off on November 5 in Shanghai.

The current wireless signal transmission equipment is expensive and low in efficiency, Chi said.

"As for cell phones, millions of base stations have been established around the world to strengthen the signal but most of the energy is consumed on their cooling systems," she said.

"The energy utilisation rate is only 5 per cent," state-run Xinhua news agency quoted her as saying.

Li-Fi was touted as a boon to China netizen community, the highest in the world with about 600 million connections.

Compared with base stations, the number of light bulbs that can be used is practically limitless.

Meanwhile, Chinese people are replacing the old-fashioned incandescent bulbs with LED light bulbs at a fast pace.

"Wherever there is an LED light bulb, there is an Internet signal. Turn off the light and there is no signal," Chi said.

However, there is still a long way to go to make Li-Fi a commercial success.

"If the light is blocked, then the signal will be cut off," Chi said.

More importantly, according to the scientist, the development of a series of key related pieces of technology, including light communication controls as well as microchip design and manufacturing, is still in an experimental period.
 
Unless this problem is solved, Li-fi is not going anywhere

Also, for speed concern, the latest 802.11ac gave 1.3Gbps vs Li-Fi's 150Mbps

Li-Fi need to solve these 2 problem before implementation

The top rate is 3.25G:

lifi??????????LED????? - ????

(assuming you read Chinese)

Also the light spectrum is 10000 times the radio spectrum,meaning far higher bandwidth and transmission rate for LiFi than for WiFi。

Remember this is just a proof of “principle”(so to speak),the data rate can be hiked many times in the future if and when the technology is commercialized。
 
The top rate is 3.25G:

lifi??????????LED????? - ????

(assuming you read Chinese)

Also the light spectrum is 10000 times the radio spectrum,meaning far higher bandwidth and transmission rate for LiFi than for WiFi。

Remember this is just a proof of “principle”(so to speak),the data rate can be hiked many times in the future if and when the technology is commercialized。

I know the LI-FI tech have a top speed of 3.2
I was comparing average speed v average speed.

802.11ac have an experiment top speed of 5Gbps with 8 node and that was carrying over 802.11n network, speed will be 7Gbps if using the 802,11 ac network node

Tech Guide: Next-generation 802.11ac Wi-Fi | ZDNet



About the spectrum, indeed the wavelength is 10,000 higher but as you may know, the higher the wave length, the weaker the signal that would translate to more interference and shorter range

Plus, there are already too many wi-fi device in china, unless Li-fi are can use the existing infrastructure, the cost of overhaul is large.

I am not saying this is not a good technology, I am saying it need some refinement
 
So we will need line of sight to operate the internet? Other than commercial use I do not see how it would be feasible to have every blub in the vicinity to be operational with lifi in order to get internet.
 
So we will need line of sight to operate the internet? Other than commercial use I do not see how it would be feasible to have every blub in the vicinity to be operational with lifi in order to get internet.

Line of sight requirement of Lifi make the technology steps behind for home use.

You can still use it at home, assume using it like a light bulb, instead of mounting the router on your wall, you mount them on the ceiling :)
 
Unless this problem is solved, Li-fi is not going anywhere

Also, for speed concern, the latest 802.11ac gave 1.3Gbps vs Li-Fi's 150Mbps

Li-Fi need to solve these 2 problem before implementation

The Chinese had been boasting many inventions, none of their inventions yet commercialized. Remember about the super computer which they ran headlines how it is far more power than any other super computers? Now, nowhere it is mentioned again.

Back to the Li Fi, same thing to be said, the Chinese extremist will raise this invention like some greatest human invention, that is future human despite its flaw
"Wherever there is an LED light bulb, there is an Internet signal. Turn off the light and there is no signal,"
 
The Chinese had been boasting many inventions, none of their inventions yet commercialized. Remember about the super computer which they ran headlines how it is far more power than any other super computers? Now, nowhere it is mentioned again.

Back to the Li Fi, same thing to be said, the Chinese extremist will raise this invention like some greatest human invention, that is future human despite its flaw

That supercomputer you mentioned we're using intel CPUs
 
You can still use it at home, assume using it like a light bulb, instead of mounting the router on your wall, you mount them on the ceiling :)

I don't think it will be practical. Now one has to set up "light bulb" in every room and if you standup for a coffee, line of sight may be obstructed by human body itself.
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom