Baba_Yaga
BANNED
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2020
- Messages
- 998
- Reaction score
- -18
- Country
- Location
How about the putting the hundreds of babur cruise missiles and hundreds of ballistic missiles to use? Simply put these indians are sooooo short sighted. Even without nukes if Pakistan believed a war was inevitable it would launch a premptive strike of hundreds if not thousands of missiles along with drones on indian air bases in north india upto delhi. We all have seen what a few iranian ballistic missiles did to the american base now imagine that time hundreds. This is without even taking into consideration air strikes that would follow. Pakistan does not need nukes to destroy the IAF.
The warning pakistan gave to india last year of 10 missiles for every missile launched was a sufficient deterence in itself... even when we had their pilot hostage infront of the international media
Missiles are expensive, not only the initial cost, but also maintenance. i doubt any country except US and Russia(due to their cold war history) has "thousands of missiles". If having thousands of missiles was the answer to everything, no country would bother having an airforce or army. Besides, a missile conflict like the one you are mentioning will mainly hurt Pakistan. With a far smaller land area to strike, India could literally devastate every piece of hardware and infrastructure that you've got.
JF-17 is leagues ahead of F-16 son esp the block 3 version. Funny how indiots can never accept reality. Your super pooper SU-30mki got aced by the thunders forget your crap migs
Seems like its you who needs tea. JF17 barely qualifies as a 4th gen jet. It's leagues behind even the earliest versions of F16, let alone block 3. It couldn't shoot down an Su30 stationary on the ground. if it did shootdown any jet on feb27, it was probably your own F16. If your DG ISPR didn't have such a loud mouth on twitter, we would have never known about it. 3 pilots captured, then 2 pilots captured, then finally, 1 pilot captured.