sancho
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,011
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
The NLCAs in operational service are going to be the same standard as LCA mk2. The first six (or nine, im not sure) are going to be in MK1 standards, as proof of concept in navalising the LCA. After that, they will make NLCAs in the same standard as the MK2 LCAs of the IAF, but navalised of course.
That's too simplistic, because there are several differences and they will be used under different situations!
A normal single engine, light / medium class airforce fighter in CAP role carries a centerline fuel tank, with increased internal fuel tanks (+mid air refueling capability and credible number of refuelling aircrafts available), IAF LCA MK2 is likely to use no external fuel tank at all.
For IN and althought N-LCA will be based on the MK2 changes as well, things will be different! Taking off via ski-jump burnes a lot of fuel, which partially can be countered by refuelling after take off, but since carrier fighters will be operated in long range and endurance missions, N-LCA MK2 will at least carry the centerline fuel tank too. By the fact that mid air refuelling aircrafts are limeted on a carrier, they still might even carry 2 wing fuel tanks.
In A2G things gets even more different, since LCA in IAF would be covered by numbers of more capable fighters, N-LCA will only a have limited numbers of escorts, not to meantion that it's payload and hardpoints are limited too. In any case of anti ship or strike roles, the Mig is way more useful, since it can carry more weapons, while the N-LCA might ony be good for escorts and recon missions only.
LCA in IAF can be a useful low end multi role fighter, while N-LCA would be a useful naval tech demonstrator, but not a useful carrier fighter. Ordering it in higher numbers and paying so much for it's development is just a waste of money and is making LCA as a project more costly. More logical would be to split LCA and AMCA developments, LCA only for IAFs lower end, while AMCA should be INs stealth fighter (while IAF has FGFA).