What's new

Lawmakers frustrated with Pakistan after bin Laden takedown, threaten aid

xLancex

FULL MEMBER
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
290
Reaction score
0
By Associated Press, Published: May 17
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans and Democrats warned Pakistan on Tuesday that billions of dollars in American aid are at stake if Islamabad doesn’t step up its efforts against terrorists, a clear sign of the growing exasperation after the U.S. takedown of Osama bin Laden deep inside Pakistan.

The frustration evident at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing exposed the dilemma for the United States, which needs Pakistan for its supply routes into Afghanistan in the 10th year of the war there and its help in any talks with the Taliban. Still, questions loom about the uneven ally in the aftermath of the May 2 raid in which U.S. SEALs killed bin Laden on an estate near a Pakistani military training academy.

Just back from a weekend trip to Afghanistan and Pakistan, the committee chairman, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said he told Pakistani leaders about the deep concerns in Congress and the nation about the country’s eagerness in the terror fight. The White House signed off on Kerry’s trip, which sought to ease tensions with Pakistan.

“I underscored the importance of seizing this moment to firmly reject an anti-American narrative that exploits our differences instead of finding common ground and advancing mutual goals,” Kerry said, three hours after landing on U.S. soil.

At the State Department, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said the United States remains committed to the people and government of Pakistan as they defend their democracy against extremists.

“Obviously there are important concerns and many questions that have to be addressed and worked through,” she said. “But I would just remind us all that in recent years our cooperation between our governments, our militaries, our law enforcement agencies has increased pressure on al-Qaida and the Taliban, and we want that progress to continue.”

At the Senate hearing, the sourness toward Pakistan came from all political quarters.

“After the bin Laden mission, I think all of us, our initial response in regards to Pakistan is: How could Pakistan either be so inept or so complicitous?” said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md. “So I think we’re now going through an evaluation, whether Pakistan’s our ally and friend.”

Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee said many in Congress “are wanting to call ‘time out’ on aid until we can ascertain what is in our best interest and what I would consider to be more of a transactional relationship.”

The United States has provided some $20 billion in aid to Pakistan since 2001, and there have been efforts in Congress to cut some of the $1.1 billion for Pakistan in the defense bill in the House.

“Going forward, Pakistan must do much more than it has to root out terrorists in Pakistan,” said Sen. Dick Lugar of Indiana, the committee’s top Republican.

Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., said Pakistan is a country that “plays a double game,” and Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J., said “selective engagement makes us think of selective assistance.”

Sen. James Risch, R-Idaho, said his constituents have asked, “Why are we spending our kids’ and our grandkids’ money to do this in a country that really doesn’t like us? ... It’s a hard sell to the American people.”

Adding to the dissatisfaction among lawmakers was the arrival of Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani in China on Tuesday and his recent pronouncement that the Asian nation is Islamabad’s “all-weather friend.”

Retired Gen. James Jones, President Barack Obama’s former national security adviser, suggested the United States imposes conditions on American aid, linking it to whether Pakistan rejects terrorism as an instrument of foreign policy and takes definitive steps to go after terrorists.

“Unless and until they commit to doing those things, it’s going to be difficult, I think, to get a significant — get our taxpayers to understand the logic of continuing to support a country that doesn’t seem to be able to get its act together on that particular — those particular very logical points,” Jones told the committee.

Kerry briefed members of the Senate Democratic caucus about his trip. After the closed-door session, Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., said there was a strong feeling among both Democrats and Republicans that continuing financial support for Pakistan should require it to take military action against the Haqqani network, an Afghan Taliban group based in Pakistan’s northwestern border regions that is “killing our troops” in Afghanistan.

Pakistan should also arrest members of the Quetta Shura, Afghan Taliban leaders, including supreme leader Mullah Omar, suspected to be based in southwestern Pakistan, he said.

“There’s a real problem with continuing financial support to Pakistan when they continue to support the Haqqani network,” Levin told reporters. “These people are killing us. And this is open. This is not something like bin Laden when they denied bin Laden was there for five years, which is pretty hard to accept.”

“They do know where the Haqqanis are. They’re openly in North Waziristan,” Levin added.

In his trip, Kerry delivered a fresh message to Pakistan — it’s losing U.S. friends quickly. If they had any doubts, he said he would make sure the leadership saw a transcript of the hearing.

But he insisted the complicated relationship between the United States and the nuclear power of some 180 million people is critical to American national security and resolving the conflict in Afghanistan.

“Right now we have about 100,000 reasons for worrying about our relationship with Pakistan, and they’re called our young men and women, and they’re in uniform in Afghanistan,” Kerry said.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the Obama administration have said they will negotiate with any Taliban member who embraces the Afghan constitution, renounces violence and severs ties with al-Qaida. Informal contacts have been made in recent months with high-ranking Taliban figures, but no formal peace talks are under way.

Clinton said the U.S. backs “an Afghan-led process of reconciliation and currently we have a broad range of contacts that are ongoing across Afghanistan and the region at many different levels in order to support the Afghan initiative.”

She said it would be easier for the Taliban to abandon its alliance with al-Qaida after the death of bin Laden.

___

Lawmakers frustrated with Pakistan after bin Laden takedown, threaten aid - The Washington Post
 
. .
^ Go f$ck yours selves!

why so serious?
night-joker.jpg
 
.
take your aid and shove it up your @sses seriously stop the aid majority of pakistanis would welcome it .Pakistani government is corrupt and treacherous less money they have the better.
 
.
Oh for God's sake.. stop it already.. we have been waiting for decades for you to take this decision.. two thumbs up for US senators on deciding to stop Pakistan's AID.. Yay! now we will be Aids Free :P

BTW, were you posing it as a threat??
 
. .
According to the U.S., “Defense News,” 25 reported that a former Air Force Chief of Staff, U.S. General Moseley Fisher Institute in Israel on the development of air power, said the annual forum, the U.S. military in future conflicts
 
.
which means I Los Angeles escort can't video the singers at my shows, but if a mate of mine records Los Angeles escorts it, we're okay???

on a side note Los Angeles asian escort does this mean I can record my singers and give them a copy for their own personal use if I make no profit from it.

Not trying to be Los Angeles asian escorts awkward (though I realise i am) just struggling to get a clear idea what is and what isn't allowed.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom