In Pakistan, Neither the rights of minority are protected, nor do they have the same rights as the Majority ... Anyone who claims otherwise is either delusional or is being disingenuous.
Ahmedis do not consider themselves as different religion, 'Impersonating' is out of question. Majority of Sunnis don't consider Shia as fellow Muslims, should they be declared 'Impersonators' too ?? Be careful, it's a slippery slope ..... There is no "definition of Islam" agreed upon by all sects. Varying/different human interpretations of the (same) divine revelation essentially tend to be contradictory in nature ... This was pointed out by the honorable Supreme Court of Pakistan in 1953/54 (You too were Pakistanis back then) ... Mullahs belonging to different sects couldn't agree upon any definition of Islam (accepted by all) when the court asked them to define "Muslim". .... For details see "Munir's Report of 1954". The honorable judges observed:
Keeping in view the several definitions given by the ulama, need we make any comment except that no two learned divines are agreed on this fundamental? If we attempt our own definition, as each learned divine has done, and that definition differs from that given by all others, we unanimously go out of the fold of Islam. And if we adopt the definition given by any one of the ulama, we remain Muslims according to the view of that alim, but kafirs according to the definition of everyone else.
Jinnah wanted same rights (and duties) for all the citizens of Pakistan regardless of religion, race, caste, or creed. But our current Constitution discriminates between Pakistani citizens on the basis of religion. You can't have it both ways. You either can be a supporter of Jinnah's Pakistan, or you can support the current Constitution/Pakistan. You can't support both at the same time as they are diametrically opposed to each other
