What's new

Laughs Reacts for Martyrs on ISPR Post

It’s utter disgrace because we’re honouring our occupiers who killed our fellow Muslim tribals. We all agree that British occupied the whole region. Pakistan army on one day takes credit for tribals fighting British like naming a ssg battalion Powindah after Mullah Powindah but it also allows Sikh soldiers to come to the site where they massacred many tribals. The real heros were the tribals who with swords attacked an British Indian fort which was manned by people with guns. Why hasn’t Pakistan army honoured those brave tribals for raiding a fort with only swords but choose to honour British Indian Sikh occupiers?
It’s an utter disgrace from Islamic point of view, nationalist point of view and ethnic point of view.
When you honor your heroes they feel insulted. This area had all religion. Your heroes are their villains their heroes are yours. Just learn to respect that and if they want to visit their choice. For GOD sake stop making everything a huge deal.
 
.
Government should resign if they cannot discipline the fassadis.
 
.
When you honor your heroes they feel insulted.

Sikhs are less than 1% of Pakistan

And if we care about their feelings than doesn't that undo "2 nation theory"

This area had all religion.

No it didn't the areas of KPK and Baluchistan were always 95%+ Muslim the areas of Punjab and Sindh were divided by the Radcliffe BECAUSE OF RELIGION.

Just learn to respect that and if they want to visit their choice

Why don't we respect the mujahids who took the fort in the first place lmao.
For GOD sake stop making everything a huge deal.

People like you also say Baloch and Waziris make a huge deal out of everything and then complain why they don't like Pakistan.

At least listen to people's views not everyone will agree as we are very diverse lmfaooo
 
Last edited:
.
When you honor your heroes they feel insulted. This area had all religion. Your heroes are their villains their heroes are yours. Just learn to respect that and if they want to visit their choice. For GOD sake stop making everything a huge deal.
I feel like it is a big issue, I don't know why some refuse to see the obvious issue here...
 
. .
Didn't know about it, I'll look it up.
He laid siege to Multan and Uch Sharif. Durranis did too, but they were being typical mercenaries and doing it on the order of Sindhi, Mian Abdul Nabi Kalhora.

Anyways pathans were stealing but at least they weren’t destroying masjids. :lol:
 
.
Afghani dogs.

"Afghani dogs"

1659074825791.png


Those people you call "dogs" are Pakistanis today and are one of the most loyal ones today.

Damn bruh everyday Manzoor Pashteen gets proven more and more correct :rofl:
 
.
Lahore is hornets nest of Hindutva apologetics and India/Sikh simping.
Where did you get that? Nobody likes Hindutva/BJP people?? Just like Punjabi/Bollywood movies, songs, etc
@-blitzkrieg- is right that we are beating the bushes around the past event. Germany, France, Britain cannot forgive each other, if they cannot burry past as they did horrific things to each other.
@ahaider9 is right that KPK should have protested as they understand who are the direct affectees besides handling its political aspects.
We need to rebuild a certain institution from the ground up, too much western influence. KPK govt should have protested the move with the federal govt. Hold your own guys accountable too.
@-blitzkrieg- that is why I argued before that it is better that Army must no longer decide absolutely as they goof up on one phone call. Now, imagine if GHQ needed permission from local govt, they wd have told them No. Then political parties could protest, while British soldier could carry their tribute.

More like when the US invited MBS/Musharraf and there is one journalists who raised human right or democracy issue, then is dragged by the security. So invite but protest too and media should cover both. That is the way we cd have dealt this situation. In addition, Pak mustn't participate in their activity. Like this indian didn't sing Pak anthem for his Pak trainer.

@lastofthepatriots
Bhattis were the major affetees. Jatt and Jutt first expelled this clan from Punjab with the help of British. Before, Rao/Rana expelled Bhattis from Rajhistan.
 
Last edited:
. .
This public which caves into hypocrisy although funny but true.

This is just reinforcing what they're saying. They fear the police because of the corruption in the institution. No one wants to deal with thana culture in Pakistan.
 
.
Where did you get that? Nobody likes Hindutva/BJP people?? Just like Punjabi/Bollywood movies, songs, etc
@-blitzkrieg- is right that we are beating the bushes around the past event. Germany, France, Britain cannot forgive each other, if they cannot burry past as they did horrific things to each other.
@ahaider9 is right that KPK should have protested as they understand who are the direct affectees besides handling its political aspects.
@-blitzkrieg- that is why I argued before that it is better that Army must no longer decide absolutely as they goof up on one phone call. Now, imagine if GHQ needed permission from local govt, they wd have told them No. Then political parties could protest, while British soldier could carry their tribute.

More like when the US invited MBS/Musharraf and there is one journalists who raised human right or democracy issue, then is dragged by the security. That is the way we cd have dealt this situation. In addition, Pak mustn't perform in their activity. Like this indian didn't sing Pak anthem for his Pak trainer.

@lastofthepatriots
Bhattis were the major affetees. Jatt and Jutt first expelled this clan from Punjab with the help of British. Before, Rao/Rana expelled Bhattis from Rajhistan.

It’s not all jatts or rajputs that are qaum parast, but there are definitely some. Just like there are among pathan, baluch, and sindhi.
 
. . . . .
Back
Top Bottom