What's new

Latest: US slaps sanctions on two Pakistani firms for nuke, missile trade

.
Of what? Being abusive towards India in the campaign? That's pretty much well documented.

Nobody needs to make up things. It's your PM who is now trying hard to put that behind him. Nobody in India takes offense at election speeches though personal comments directed at an individual (Indian PM) is seen as in poor taste because you will at some point have to do business with such leaders. What was pointed out is that the change seems to have come from the Pakistan army and followed by IK's government. Even your journalists allude to that post their meeting with IK
where are other 4 examples?
his statement was reaction to Indian media bashing and after victory not during campaign

37856985_1789242441193560_5946217573740707840_n.jpg
 
.
where are other 4 examples?
his statement was reaction to Indian media bashing and after victory not during campaign

View attachment 496137
quit when you are ahead...or do the work yourself. It's common knowledge that he did it Even guys like Mani Shankar Aiyar had to try and put it in a context because the rhetoric towards the end was quite sharp and abusive.

It was only at the fag end of the campaign, when the "neck-and-neck" nature of the pre-election polls indicated that both Imran's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (Pakistan Movement for Justice) and the Sharifs' Pakistan Muslim League-N needed to draw away some of the fringe extremist voters to overtake their rivals that both abandoned reason and decency to out-bombast the other by raking up anti-Indian and even anti-Hindu sentiment. That was more in the nature of electoral one-upmanship than serious policy as these end-of-the-campaign slurs were quite out of sync with the more carefully thought out manifesto pledges.

https://www.ndtv.com/opinion/what-imran-khan-win-means-for-india-by-mani-shankar-aiyar-1890382

NEW DEHLI: India has intensified contacts with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan in the run-up to government formation reported The Times of India.

The Indian mission remains in touch with senior PTI leaders who are likely to play an important role in the new government, the Times of India said quoting unnamed sources.

While the PTI campaign was not completely devoid of anti-India rhetoric, the Indian side understands that this had more to do with the rough and tumble of Pakistan politics than any antipathy of India.

Khan's party too has been appreciative of the fact that the Indian side, contrary to the popular perception in Pakistan that the Narendra Modi government wanted Nawaz Sharif's party to return to power, remained equidistant from all parties.

"They know that the Indian mission was as much in touch with PTI as with PML-N or even with PPP", said a source.

https://nation.com.pk/30-Jul-2018/i...ith-pti-as-imran-moves-to-form-government-toi

Imran Khan, with his rabidly anti-India speeches, will certainly not provide this kind of bonhomie and so if he does come to power there may be uncertain times ahead. But as India and Indians know too well, Imran has not been alone in his anti-India stance.

https://timesofislamabad.com/22-Jul-2018/how-will-india-deal-with-pm-imran-khan
 
Last edited:
. .
Rules only for Pakistan or for your dirty Yanks
Everyone. Learn to be objective rather than some scorned sore loser calling names behind a computer.
BiS rules apply to British companies as much as Pakistan. If a certain item is dual use and Pakistan is NOT cleared for dual use, then if that item is procured by a company stating falsely that the item is not for Pakistan and then sends it for Pakistan; that company is bound to be banned.

The same way if a certain Pakistani company sells a fire control system to India but says it is for UAE.

By BiS you mean Bank of International Settement?
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/l...ion/export-control-classification-number-eccn

Lol..In 1990s we did the same with Collapsing Soviet Union. many of our private business owners bought and exported sensitive tech from Soviets and sent to Pakistan.
Nothing new.
Pakistan exists due to patriotism of Individuals , not due to any political party or person.


Bhaii aap idher hamaray Qareeb Scotland aaey they kuch saal pehlay.. Aap kii aamad kaa pataa chala aur sochaa milnay aa jaein... Mager phir aap ghaib ho gaey aur next aap kaa pataa chala aap Amreeka mein hain.
Pehlay aap Engineer they aur abb Amreeka mein business law consultant?
Kahaan kahaan...kiyaa kiyaa kertay phirr rahay hain??
Zindagi mein masroof hain... par scotland bohat yaad ata hai. Amreeka mein sukoon nahin hai jo scotland ki dhoti yani Kilt mein hai.
 
.
quit when you are ahead...or do the work yourself. It's common knowledge that he did it Even guys like Mani Shankar Aiyar had to try and put it in a context because the rhetoric towards the end was quite sharp and abusive.

It was only at the fag end of the campaign, when the "neck-and-neck" nature of the pre-election polls indicated that both Imran's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (Pakistan Movement for Justice) and the Sharifs' Pakistan Muslim League-N needed to draw away some of the fringe extremist voters to overtake their rivals that both abandoned reason and decency to out-bombast the other by raking up anti-Indian and even anti-Hindu sentiment. That was more in the nature of electoral one-upmanship than serious policy as these end-of-the-campaign slurs were quite out of sync with the more carefully thought out manifesto pledges.

https://www.ndtv.com/opinion/what-imran-khan-win-means-for-india-by-mani-shankar-aiyar-1890382

NEW DEHLI: India has intensified contacts with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan in the run-up to government formation reported The Times of India.

The Indian mission remains in touch with senior PTI leaders who are likely to play an important role in the new government, the Times of India said quoting unnamed sources.

While the PTI campaign was not completely devoid of anti-India rhetoric, the Indian side understands that this had more to do with the rough and tumble of Pakistan politics than any antipathy of India.

Khan's party too has been appreciative of the fact that the Indian side, contrary to the popular perception in Pakistan that the Narendra Modi government wanted Nawaz Sharif's party to return to power, remained equidistant from all parties.

"They know that the Indian mission was as much in touch with PTI as with PML-N or even with PPP", said a source.

https://nation.com.pk/30-Jul-2018/i...ith-pti-as-imran-moves-to-form-government-toi

Imran Khan, with his rabidly anti-India speeches, will certainly not provide this kind of bonhomie and so if he does come to power there may be uncertain times ahead. But as India and Indians know too well, Imran has not been alone in his anti-India stance.

https://timesofislamabad.com/22-Jul-2018/how-will-india-deal-with-pm-imran-khan
where are the speeches give me video links i want to see them
 
. .
We know you people have no life of your own, just a desperate dejected lot, living on news of Indians raping 6 month old kids to Indians raping dogs to Indians raping women. We are happy that your obsession with Pakistan and Pakistani news gives you some hope for otherwise a lame useless life.




..:azn:. as far as how this problem or any other affects us; it’s pretty simple. Your problems might finally give you a reality check. Or so we can hope. Do you think the LoC has gone quiet just like that.…or your army chief seems to be in a more friendly mood because he suddenly wants peace....? Or that your PM who went hammer and tongs at India and Modi during the campaign just changed his tune for no reason.....? Your problems are of interest to us.....far more than you realise and not only for reason of schadenfreude....
 
.
quit when you are ahead...or do the work yourself. It's common knowledge that he did it Even guys like Mani Shankar Aiyar had to try and put it in a context because the rhetoric towards the end was quite sharp and abusive.

It was only at the fag end of the campaign, when the "neck-and-neck" nature of the pre-election polls indicated that both Imran's Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (Pakistan Movement for Justice) and the Sharifs' Pakistan Muslim League-N needed to draw away some of the fringe extremist voters to overtake their rivals that both abandoned reason and decency to out-bombast the other by raking up anti-Indian and even anti-Hindu sentiment. That was more in the nature of electoral one-upmanship than serious policy as these end-of-the-campaign slurs were quite out of sync with the more carefully thought out manifesto pledges.

https://www.ndtv.com/opinion/what-imran-khan-win-means-for-india-by-mani-shankar-aiyar-1890382

NEW DEHLI: India has intensified contacts with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Chairman Imran Khan in the run-up to government formation reported The Times of India.

The Indian mission remains in touch with senior PTI leaders who are likely to play an important role in the new government, the Times of India said quoting unnamed sources.

While the PTI campaign was not completely devoid of anti-India rhetoric, the Indian side understands that this had more to do with the rough and tumble of Pakistan politics than any antipathy of India.

Khan's party too has been appreciative of the fact that the Indian side, contrary to the popular perception in Pakistan that the Narendra Modi government wanted Nawaz Sharif's party to return to power, remained equidistant from all parties.

"They know that the Indian mission was as much in touch with PTI as with PML-N or even with PPP", said a source.

https://nation.com.pk/30-Jul-2018/i...ith-pti-as-imran-moves-to-form-government-toi

Imran Khan, with his rabidly anti-India speeches, will certainly not provide this kind of bonhomie and so if he does come to power there may be uncertain times ahead. But as India and Indians know too well, Imran has not been alone in his anti-India stance.

https://timesofislamabad.com/22-Jul-2018/how-will-india-deal-with-pm-imran-khan

This is why no one takes Indian analysis on Pakistan seriously. You guys are all jokers and liars...
 
.
Some Pakistanis think emotionally instead of using brain. Pakistan HAS to keep good relations with the US, whether you like it or not. US is the largest export destination by far for Pakistani goods, whereas with China or Gulf, Pakistan have a deficit. The countries like India and Bangladesh are waiting for an opportunity to replace Pakistan's share of exports to the US.

What Pakistan has to do is to start charging for convoys first to congest Pakistani sea routes, then for unloading/loading supplies at ports, then to using Pakistani roads/highways, then for using dryports, then comes border crossing, etc. This way Pakistan can generate way more $$ than what it receives for aids. Pakistanis in US has to focus on education and business in order to create successful lobbies.
 
.
Seems like a routine blacklisting. Don't know what all the nationalist rhetoric on this thread is about. You guys do understand that there have been cases of nuclear leaks from Pakistan right?
 
. .
Everyone. Learn to be objective rather than some scorned sore loser calling names behind a computer.
BiS rules apply to British companies as much as Pakistan. If a certain item is dual use and Pakistan is NOT cleared for dual use, then if that item is procured by a company stating falsely that the item is not for Pakistan and then sends it for Pakistan; that company is bound to be banned.

The same way if a certain Pakistani company sells a fire control system to India but says it is for UAE.


https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/l...ion/export-control-classification-number-eccn


Zindagi mein masroof hain... par scotland bohat yaad ata hai. Amreeka mein sukoon nahin hai jo scotland ki dhoti yani Kilt mein hai.
OH You are false flag er yank
 
.
No conspiracy here.
Any firm that violates BiS export controls will be penalized.
Whether Pakistani or Mauritian.

Break the law, get penalized.. I deal with the BiS, rules are rules; these firms deserve it.
True maybe however can you say with certainty that laws are never bipassed or over looked when it served US interests? Besides why do it at this conjuncture when US and Pakistani relations are all time low and there is US FM coming to Pakistan unless US has no intentions of mending ties and Pompeo is coming just to give some sort of ultimatum to Pakistan?
 
.
True maybe however can you say with certainty that laws are never bipassed or over looked when it served US interests? Besides why do it at this conjuncture when US and Pakistani relations are all time low and there is US FM coming to Pakistan unless US has no intentions of mending ties and Pompeo is coming just to give some sort of ultimatum to Pakistan?

Lets say one can overlook certain laws (just as they were for Israeli compnies selling to Pakistan in the 90's). The law is only as good as applied. Per the law these companies should have been sanctioned earlier but since the idea was to overlook to let Pakistan have the capability, they were kept open.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom