Latest Deadly Ebola Outbreak in Central Africa linked to Cannibalism

[Tiberius]

Sorry some image mix up .

Red hair can be natural hair color . it also can be the result of chemical in the surrounding environment . only through labratoary examination can say which was truth .

By the way you just need to look at Ramses mummy from side to instantly ssee he did not had black ancestry . but its not like that there was no black Faroah . the 25th dynasty of Egypt for example were black.

Ramses DNA says he was red haired. He also had green eyes.

The 25 th dynasty was seen as shame for Egypt. When it was at its weakest. It also only lasted 90 years.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Ramses DNA says he was red haired. He also had green eyes.

The 25 th dynasty was seen as shame for Egypt. When it was at its weakest. It also only lasted 90 years.

to me the 26th dynasty which were vassals of Assyrian was a shame to Egypt. they united Upper egypt , Lowe Egypt and Kush something that has not happened since 20th dynasty .
by the way 25th dynasty built more pyramid than anybody else

 

[Tiberius]

to me the 26th dynasty which were vassals of Assyrian was a shame to Egypt. they united Upper egypt , Lowe Egypt and Kush something that has not happened since 20th dynasty .
by the way 25th dynasty built more pyramid than anybody else

Too be honest evrything after 20th dynasty was a shame. Except the ptolemaic dynasty which restored egyptian power but under greek rule.

 

[Hack-Hook]

oh and before I forget
Fourtenth dynasty of Egypt 15 years
Sixtenth dynasty of Egypt 60 years
Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt 103 years
Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt 112 years
Twenty-first Dynasty of Egypt 124 years
Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt 111 years
Twenty-fourth Dynasty of Egypt 12 years
Twenty-sixth Dynasty of Egypt less than 50 years

Too be honest evrything after 20th dynasty was a shame. Except the ptolemaic dynasty which restored egyptian power but under greek rule.

well , for me its 26th dynasty and after that , even Ptolemaic dynasty was a shame for Egypt.
the rulers after 26th dynasty were Vassals Of Assyrian or Iranians or even didn't consider themselves Egyptian at all .
you see the last native egyptian ruler was 30th dynasty after that till 1952 all the ruler were foreigners

 

[Saif al-Arab]

oh and before I forget
Fourtenth dynasty of Egypt 15 years
Sixtenth dynasty of Egypt 60 years
Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt 103 years
Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt 112 years
Twenty-first Dynasty of Egypt 124 years
Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt 111 years
Twenty-fourth Dynasty of Egypt 12 years
Twenty-sixth Dynasty of Egypt less than 50 years


well , for me its 26th dynasty and after that , even Ptolemaic dynasty was a shame for Egypt.
the rulers after 26th dynasty were Vassals Of Assyrian or Iranians or even didn't consider themselves Egyptian at all .
you see the last native egyptian ruler was 30th dynasty after that till 1952 all the ruler were foreigners

Using that logic every ruler after the native Elamites of Iran was a foreigner. That's not how history works.

Besides none of those dynasties were Sub-Saharan/Negroid. Nubians have a large degree of Western Asian/Semitic lineage. Genetically probably around 50%. Skin color is not all that matters.

They and Horners, especially Southern Semitic speaking ones such as Habesha, have nothing to do with your average Sub-Saharan African and ironically only the Nubians and Horners had what you can call real civilizations outside of North Africa. It shows.

Where are the civilizations of Southern Africa? Western Africa? Central Africa?

Congo that this article talks about, the heartland of Africa?

There is a reason why Arabs and Europeans had such an easy time subjecting people in those regions of Africa and influencing them. Yet old habits seldom die. Such as cannibalism, killing Albinos, witch doctors killing "possessed" children and 1000's of other absurd nonsense. Even their Islam and Christianity is twisted and mixes absurd local traditions.

Using that logic, I am sure Eskimos also had some kind of "civilization" in Northern Canada and Greenland. Fact of the matter is that Sub-Saharan Africans (historically) and even today are at the lowest positions on those fronts.

That's not to say that they cannot improve or are "genetically inferior" (the DNA of Homo Sapiens are all the same from a biological point of view). It's just that history is what it is.

 

[Tiberius]

oh and before I forget
Fourtenth dynasty of Egypt 15 years
Sixtenth dynasty of Egypt 60 years
Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt 103 years
Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt 112 years
Twenty-first Dynasty of Egypt 124 years
Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt 111 years
Twenty-fourth Dynasty of Egypt 12 years
Twenty-sixth Dynasty of Egypt less than 50 years


well , for me its 26th dynasty and after that , even Ptolemaic dynasty was a shame for Egypt.
the rulers after 26th dynasty were Vassals Of Assyrian or Iranians or even didn't consider themselves Egyptian at all .
you see the last native egyptian ruler was 30th dynasty after that till 1952 all the ruler were foreigners

Ptolemaic was a shame? It brought back whealth, Stability, education Art and culture

 

[Hack-Hook]

Ptolemaic was a shame? It brought back whealth, Stability, education Art and culture

they were a shame for Egyptian , as they considered themselves Greek not Egyptian .
here we were not talking about efficiency of the dynasty. otherwise the 30th dynasty specially its last ruler were also great builder and brought prosperity

Using that logic every ruler after the native Elamites of Iran was a foreigner. That's not how history works.

Besides none of those dynasties were Sub-Saharan/Negroid. Nubians have a large degree of Western Asian/Semitic lineage. Genetically probably around 50%. Skin color is not all that matters.

They and Horners, especially Southern Semitic speaking ones such as Habesha, have nothing to do with your average Sub-Saharan African and ironically only the Nubians and Horners had what you can call real civilizations outside of North Africa. It shows.

Where are the civilizations of Southern Africa? Western Africa? Central Africa?

Congo that this article talks about, the heartland of Africa?

There is a reason why Arabs and Europeans had such an easy time subjecting people in those regions of Africa and influencing them. Yet old habits seldom die. Such as cannibalism, killing Albinos, witch doctors killing "possessed" children and 1000's of other absurd nonsense. Even their Islam and Christianity is twisted and mixes absurd local traditions.

Using that logic, I am sure Eskimos also had some kind of "civilization" in Northern Canada and Greenland. Fact of the matter is that Sub-Saharan Africans (historically) and even today are at the lowest positions on those fronts.

That's not to say that they cannot improve or are "genetically inferior" (the DNA of Homo Sapiens are all the same from a biological point of view). It's just that history is what it is.

there is a difference if the ruler consider himself as being part of that land or not

 

[Tiberius]

they were a shame for Egyptian , as they considered themselves Greek not Egyptian .
here we were not talking about efficiency of the dynasty. otherwise the 30th dynasty specially its last ruler were also great builder and brought prosperity


there is a difference if the ruler consider himself as being part of that land or not

Cant be said for evry ruler of the Ptolemaic dynasty.

Cleopatra VII for example spoke fluent Egyptian, Latin, Greek and Persian. She was very educated and did evrything in her power to keep Egypt safe

 

[Desert Fox]

but sadly today nobody is interested that much in Africa civilization and kingdoms

Because these "civilizations" have left nothing of value for the rest of the world.

For example, can you name even a single sub-saharan African (Black) philosopher who's theories have influenced any great movements of history and present times?

Its funny because a Nigerian man tried to claim Allama Iqbal as a Black philosopher . Some blacks are now trying to steal other people's history as their own.

 

[Saif al-Arab]

Because these "civilizations" have left nothing of value for the rest of the world.

For example, can you name even a single sub-saharan African (Black) philosopher who's theories have influenced any great movements of history and present times?

Its funny because a Nigerian man tried to claim Allama Iqbal as a Black philosopher . Some blacks are now trying to steal other people's history as their own.

Blacks in the US are the worst when it comes to stealing other peoples cultures and historical personalities. It's endemic in relation to "proximate" cultures and civilizations (Arabs, Semitic peoples, Middle Easterners, Southern Europeans). You are lucky by being located further away so you are yet to have a large group of Africans claiming everything as being "originally Black". But seems to have begun judging by your comment.

Also, I need to correct my statement about Afro-Arabs being largely a non-problematic community. It's a truth statement compared to Blacks in most other places of the world, but even in KSA, all the few "slums"/ghettos/bad neighborhood, are almost solely inhabited by Afro-Arabs. So in fact I was too "mild" in my post before.

BTW, people don't speak about this but the 3.5 million strong Arab community in the US are often attacked/harassed by Blacks as are many other minority groups in the US.

Luckily such Blacks have a very bad perception in the Arab world and especially Northern African states are under attack by hordes of Sub-Saharan Africans who are migrating in hordes into Morocco, Algeria, LIBYA, etc. and causing a lot of problems by large.

https://www.rnw.org/archive/arabs-hate-black-people

Libyans know how to deal with them though.

Black on Black crime in the US far predates anything else yet they are world champions in "playing the blame game".

There is something seriously rotten with the African-American community.

 

[Desert Fox]

Blacks in the US are the worst when it comes to stealing other peoples cultures and historical personalities. It's endemic in relation to "proximate" cultures and civilizations (Arabs, Semitic peoples, Middle Easterners, Southern Europeans). You are lucky by being located further away so you are yet to have a large group of Africans claiming everything as being "originally Black". But seems to have begun judging by your comment.

Lol bro they even claim Chinese, Japanese & Korean civilizations, history and heritage, forget about proximate civilizations.

http://www.trinicenter.com/FirstChinese.htm


They also claim Mesoamerican and other American civilizations :

http://en.lisapoyakama.org/the-famous-maya-people-were-partly-black/

Also, I need to correct my statement about Afro-Arabs being largely a non-problematic community. It's a truth statement compared to Blacks in most other places of the world, but even in KSA, all the few "slums"/ghettos/bad neighborhood, are almost solely inhabited by Afro-Arabs. So in fact I was too "mild" in my post before.

Interesting. By Afro-Arabs as in Arab-African mixed people's or just Africans living in Arab lands for centuries?

BTW, people don't speak about this but the 3.5 million strong Arab community in the US are often attacked/harassed by Blacks as are many other minority groups in the US.

Luckily such Blacks have a very bad perception in the Arab world and especially Northern African states are under attack by hordes of Sub-Saharan Africans who are migrating in hordes into Morocco, Algeria, LIBYA, etc. and causing a lot of problems by large.

Blacks attack non-Black immigrant communities because those communities are successful and disprove the notion of the white man holding down the non-whites.

But from what I have seen in America when I lived there Arabs were the most pro-Black among the different immigrant Muslim communities that lived in America. Even Somalis were more averse to the African American population. On average I have seen more Arab-African couples than any other immigrant Muslim group.

Black on Black crime in the US far predates anything else yet they are world champions in "playing the blame game".

There is something seriously rotten with the African-American community

True. The crime rate of Chicago and Detroit is on the same level as West Africa (Nigeria).

 

[Śakra]

Lol bro they even claim Chinese, Japanese & Korean civilizations, history and heritage, forget about proximate civilizations.

http://www.trinicenter.com/FirstChinese.htm


They also claim Mesoamerican and other American civilizations :

http://en.lisapoyakama.org/the-famous-maya-people-were-partly-black/


Interesting. By Afro-Arabs as in Arab-African mixed people's or just Africans living in Arab lands for centuries?


Blacks attack non-Black immigrant communities because those communities are successful and disprove the notion of the white man holding down the non-whites.

But from what I have seen in America when I lived there Arabs were the most pro-Black among the different immigrant Muslim communities that lived in America. Even Somalis were more averse to the African American population. On average I have seen more Arab-African couples than any other immigrant Muslim group.


True. The crime rate of Chicago and Detroit is on the same level as West Africa (Nigeria).

We wuz Tangz n shietz