Gibbs
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2013
- Messages
- 7,319
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
- Location
It will be stupid to call her so-called singer just because readers dont know her.. its like saying Sirisena so called president of Lanka because not many know the guy in US. NYT is of course trying to explain the term 'playback singer'...
Ofcause
well in that case, i understand ur situation. you can relate to the report more than i do.
its like, LTTE (well i know lata mangeshkar n ltte are poles apart, but this example is just for understanding). sri lankans and indians would know about ltte, but some media based in LA might not know about their actions here and term them "just another fringe element". does this anyway reduce the pain the sri lankans had to go through ? similarly, lata's greatness doesnt diminish due to an article in "some newspaper".
however, such brouhaha about an article is stretching things too far.
Well i'm not arguing about her greatness to Indians, Cos i'm not that aware of her but NYT is a American media outlet catering to Americans, And they would not know zilch about either this lady or what a playback singer is.. Both alien subjects to them, Of cause unless you're American of East Indian origin
It'll be the same here in Australia, Unless she is a Cricketer nobody really would know about her..