What's new

Lashkars, private militias and militants

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Lashkars, private militias and militants

Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Rahimullah Yusufzai

The desperate American idea of raising village militias to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan is reportedly being opposed by President Hamid Karzai at a time when Pakistan is suffering from the consequences of this policy.

The brutal bombings in Ekkaghund town in the tribal region of Mohmand Agency on July 9 in which 106 people, mostly civilians, were killed was a consequence of the initiative sponsored by the Pakistan government and the military to mobilise the tribes to take on the Taliban militants. The attack was a botched Taliban attempt to target the Utmankhel tribal jirga from the Ambar area in Mohmand Agency where the militants had met tough resistance and suffered considerable losses at the hands of the local lashkar, or armed force, ironically referred to as amn, or peace, committee.

The Taliban spokesman, Ikramullah Mohmand, for Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Mohmand Agency chapter, while claiming responsibility for the attack made it clear that the Utmankhel jirga elders from Ambar were the target of the suicide bombings. The Taliban normally don't make such claims when market-places are bombed and many civilians are killed and injured, but in this case the TTP accepted responsibility for the attack and at the same time expressed regrets over the civilian deaths. This was something rare, though there is no way any repentance on the part of the Taliban would satisfy the bereaved families or change public opinion about the horrible Ekkaghund bombings that turned a bustling rural town into a graveyard.

With the exception of Malik Sahibzada Utmankhel who had been instrumental in raising the anti-Taliban lashkar in his native Prang Ghar area, all the jirga members and the government officials holding a meeting at the time of the attack in the compound of the assistant political agent's offices survived the twin bombings. The suicide bombers, apparently two in number as one rode a motorcycle to escort the other driving an explosives-packed vehicle, failed to enter the government compound after colliding with a passenger van. The devastating blasts caused death and destruction on a massive scale as tribespeople living in Ekkaghund town and selling and buying in the bazaar were caught in the explosions.

The government-backed lashkars of tribal and village communities have sometimes been effective in tackling the Taliban militants in parts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa and Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), but the cost of this initiative in terms of human and material losses has been unusually high. The lashkars in Dhog Darra in Upper Dir district, Salarzai area in Bajaur Agency and Ambar in Mohmand Agency have been notably effective even though the tribes involved in the effort suffered huge losses and are still required to be battle-ready all the time. At times, the support promised by the government didn't materialise. Many tribal elders often wonder for how long they would have to mobilise their young men to take on an enemy as determined as the Taliban.

Some of them complain that they were forced by the authorities to raise lashkars and fight the militants. In their view, they were being asked to do something that the government and its security forces have been largely unable to accomplish.

Blood-feuds have been the bane of the Pashtun society, which must be the most heavily-armed in the world, but the kind of feuds triggered by the enmities involving the Taliban militants and the lashkars are unparalleled. The militants, ruthless and revengeful, have retaliated with a vengeance through suicide bombers to attack jirgas while in session, kill pro-government tribal chiefs and intimidate the common people.

Though exact figures aren't available, more than 250 tribal elders lost their lives in the tribal areas because they defied the militants or continued to interact with government and military officials despite being warned. Some of the major TTP attacks on jirgas included the one in Darra Adamkhel in March 2008 when more than 40 tribal elders were killed in a suicide bombing and another targeting the Salarzai jirga in Bajaur that caused the deaths of 22 tribal chieftains in November 2008. The biggest loss of tribal elders and commoners was in Khadezai area in Orakzai Agency in the same year when a Taliban suicide bomber mowed down a lashkar being raised to fight the militants and killed around 140 people.

The lashkars, comprising men of the same Pashtun stock harbouring strong feelings of honour and revenge, have been equally vindictive. Revenge killings are now the order of the day as militants and their facilitators are hunted down, their houses are demolished and their families are banished from ancestral villages. The Taliban are being paid back in the same coin and punishment meted out to them is justified on the ground that they did the same to their opponents while in control of places like Swat, Bajaur, Darra Adamkhel and Bara.

In neighbouring Afghanistan, the private militias coming to the aid of the military are as old as the three-decade-old Afghan conflict. Afghan communist rulers under the guidance of the Soviet Red Army raised such militias, including the one led by a former factory worker Abdul Rasheed Dostum, to fight the Afghan mujahideen in the 1980s. The Dostum militia or Gilum Jam as it was commonly called comprised Uzbek and Turkmen fighters who not only tried to keep the mujahideen out of their own neighbourhoods in northern Afghanistan but also served as mercenaries deployed in Pashtun-populated areas. Dostum and commamders of other militias lacked ideology and principles and joined whoever was willing to pay the price.

A Japan-funded disarmament and demobilisation programme in Afghanistan implemented a few years ago is now generally categorised as a failure as private militias continue to exist. The US and its NATO allies in desperate attempts to control the growing Taliban insurgency also resorted to campaigns to mobilise Afghan villagers to take on the militants in their areas. These militias were given different names, though the Afghans normally call them arbaki. The US Special Operations forces are behind the latest effort to train, arm and assist the village defence militias.

General David Petraeus implemented a similar plan in Iraq by arming and paying Sunni tribes to fight Al Qaeda in Al Anbar and other provinces. Now that he has taken charge from the sacked McChrystal in Afghanistan, he is keen to widen this programme and double the number of places where the village militias would be equipped and paid to fight the Taliban.

However, President Karzai is reported to have reservations about the plan. The beleaguered Afghan president is worried it could lead to even more warlordism, already a challenge for the weak central government, and out-of-control private militias. If he had his way, he would want a strong national army loyal and accountable to the government instead of private militias answerable to warlords. But the Americans with General Petraeus leading the way are unlikely to put this plan on hold. In fact, they see it as part of their strategy to reverse the Taliban momentum and at the same time reduce their own losses. General Petraeus may incorporate some Karzai suggestions to build safeguards to prevent the village militias from defying state authority, though this won't be enough to reassure the Afghan government and people.

In Pakistan, there has been no debate on the issue of lashkars as many people see it as a legitimate and effective way to tackle the militants. There isn't much concern for the consequences of arming villagers and encouraging them to seek revenge against militants who may have wronged them. In fact, bombing incidents like the one in Ekkaghund are seen as justification for pursuing the same policy of raising lashkars in a bid to defeat the militants. The Taliban militants have done terrible things and prompted most Pakistanis to believe that they deserve no mercy and that every measures needs to be undertaken to put them out of business.



The writer is resident editor of The News in Peshawar. Email: rahim yusufzai@yahoo.com
 
. .
US is trying to make one right with two wrongs.

It is job of Police or later military to fight insurgents.

One may garner the support of locals in terms of information or logistic support but raising an armed band is ridiculous idea.

If those civilians armed bands are to be raised then Afghan Police and Army should be disbanded.
 
.
yes, raising the lashkars will be an effective way to curb the insurgency, but is this good for the country in the long term? To have an armed, almost-military like presence in a certain part of the country? especially one that is formed on the basis of revenge rather than nationalism? wouldnt they feel that the state has let them down, and that they had to take up arms to defend themselves? won't it make them more autonomous and distant from the rest of the nation? and also, what if these tribes have a fallout with each other? wont these Lashkars be used to fuel the sectarian violence?

It will definitely create warlordism in those areas. and if those people ever have a disagreement with the state, the first response they would have probably would be armed response.

also, what about other areas of Pakistan that suffers from militancy, like Punjab? Will Lashkars be raised there as well?

I know its a lot of questions, but these just popped into my head now. I dont think arming certain sects of the population will be good for the nation.
 
.
If those civilians armed bands are to be raised then Afghan Police and Army should be disbanded.

Then by that logic should we not disband FC in FATA/KP and military cantonments in Baluchistan? Because we have established civilian militias there.
 
.
Problem is when the war end Civilians armed with weapons during war, they also have their interest when then war end.
 
.
Karzai, Petraeus in Talks on Afghan militia

KABUL, July 13, 2010 (AFP) - Afghanistan's president and the commander of foreign forces in the country are trying to reach agreement on the creation of controversial grass-roots militias to fight the Taliban, an official said Tuesday.

US media have reported that US General David Petraeus, who took over command of 140,000 US and NATO troops on July 4, has been pushing for the establishment of Iraq-style tribal militia to fight militants in remote Afghan villages.

The reports have said that President Hamid Karzai had opposed the plan because of its potential to weaken his government.

Karzai's spokesman Tuesday confirmed that talks have been going on between the two men but he played down any difference of opinion on the militias.

"Everybody agrees that we have to make sure that if these forces are developed that they are developed with all the necessary checks and balances required by the constitution," Waheed Omar told reporters.

"The good point is that on most of it we all agree," he said.

"But we have to agree on some other issues," he said without giving further detail.

He said the discussions between between Karzai and Petraeus were continuing, and they met again on Tuesday, along with the US ambassador to Kabul, Karl Eikenberry.

Afghan and NATO officials have said the Tuesday meeting would be the ninth time Karzai and Petraeus had met since the US general took command.

Omar said a final decision on setting up village militias was likely as early as Wednesday, and said it could go either way.

Afghan officials fear that militias could further destabilise the war-torn country as it tries to quell a Taliban insurgency, now in its ninth year.

Omar conceded there were widespread concerns about repeating the mistakes of the 1980s, where local militias were set up during the Soviet occupation to fight mujahideen, but then morphed into private armies.

"There are concerns," he said.

"We all know that it has good points as well as some threats. We're discussing jointly how to remove those threats before taking a decision," he said.
 
.
Wow - Can anyone say 360-Mr-Patraeus?

This is a major back-peddle as this is what US did when they first took Afghanistan. Then to get away from warlordism, they started up the ANA and bought the UN charged war crimes purpetators from a variety of factions into the political arena to try and get worldwide credence from donors. Dostum decided it wasn't for him and took a trip to Turkey, I note.

It looks like Patraeus is flirting with the idea again as it seems to be the only way the US can get out of Afghanistan now that they have realized it cannot function as a unified state with central bodies from Kabul. When you have Tajiks, Uzbeks ANA / Police in a large capacity controlling the Pashtun belt - I imagine they are seen as just as much as "foreigner" as occupying forces.

It looks like this will be be their grass-roots approach.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom