Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They will have the more they die the more pressure they would come under and soon weather they like it or not they would have to leave Afghanistan@VCheng l ISAF will reduce its numbers but not to a level which is being said.
@VCheng l ISAF will reduce its numbers but not to a level which is being said.
Ah.. understood.The nastiness wasn't targeted at you. It was targeted at the the author of the article you posted since he tried to misconstrue it as some sort of a Modi conspiracy and completely twisting the original article published by ToI.
The whole "media image" debate has played out before - I maintain that the "negative image" ascribed to Pakistan (in the context of Indian allegations of support for terrorism in India and elsewhere) has had little to no tangible impact on Pakistan.As for what India has gained, the world media does recognise that Pakistan does have a problem with supporting and harbouring terrorists . You can see it on their news media and even in Hollywood movies that the world watches. This has great impact on Pakistan's image as you can see with Gallup's polls about Pakistan's favourability in the world. Image matters in the 21st century.
Apart from that, various countries in the world and the UN have designated many of the terror organisations operating from Pakistani soil as terror organisations. Some of these are anti-India like the LeT. That too is of high importance , especially when Pakistan is seen not to be acting against them and is seen as giving them a free run on their land.
Battle for image and reputation in the 21st century is as important as a real battle , I believe and it's a battle Pakistan has lost. The tangibility of it can be seen in the way countries view Pakistan and the investment climate there. The results will, however, be far more tangible in the long run. I hope Pakistan realises this before it's too late, if it already isn't.
saying from the state which depends on foreign Aid in bowl...
What non sense are you peddling..are you satisfied with fifty three thousand dead Pakistanis(which btw include an ex-PM of yours also)?
Point being our involvement with any proxy groups we might have helped in the past was minimal..we never went in too deep and distanced them at the right time..so the fallout on us is negligible.
Something you never learnt, before started hosting tens of terrorist outfits and turned your country into hotbed of terrorism.
You got in deep and now can not surface.
So an admission that LeT is under the control of your state?
Somebody already tried this ... remember bleed india by a thousand cuts. That went pretty well.
at least we are not a failed state... don't worry we will give out sourcing to clean it...coming from a state where half of their population has no access to toilets
at least we are not a failed state... don't worry we will give out sourcing to clean it...
Glad you remember history.The "rebels" in Junagadh, the "terrorists in Balochistan", the "terrorists in East Pakistan", the "terrorists in Sri Lanka", the "terrorists in Hyderabad" ... the Indian list of using proxies to fight their battles is just as long as the Pakistani one, but of course apologists for the Indian government and military would have us believe that they are "pure as the driven snow" ...
That's exactly what I said in my post. Read it again.
No bakwas. The source please.
Funny army isn't even fighting BLA.... U r an epic fail kiddo.. Bringing ur boy friends in every other to gain a few brownie points..When the Pakistani Army is having a tough time against BLA,what about LET.The LET will just melt like butter on a hot pan.The Baloch insurgency has been going on right from 1947.More then 5 wars have been fought till now.