What's new

Largest Emerging Economies, E7+Pakistan, growth prospects and challenges

Market Potential Index (MPI) for Emerging Markets - 2011
March 16, 2012

This indexing study is conducted by MSU-IBC to help companies compare the Emerging Markets with each other on several dimensions. Eight dimensions are chosen to represent the market potential of a country over a scale of 1 to 100. Each dimension is measured using various indicators, and are weighted in determining their contribution to the Overall Market Potential Index.

mpi.png


Market Potential Index (MPI) for Emerging Markets - 2011 >> globalEDGE: Your source for Global Business Knowledge

sometimes we find the ranking doesn't give the true picture. here we find China ranked 3rd, India 6th and Turkey 10th but there is a difference of overall sore of 14% between China and India while hardly 3% difference between India and Turkey :lol:
 
. .
.
can anyone help me move this thread to World Affairs, where I may get few posts on this topic for the materials i searched online? I mistakenly started this thread in this section also, I guess..........
 
.
Building BRICs of growth
Jun 5th 2008

Record spending on infrastructure will help to sustain rapid growth in emerging economies

THE biggest investment boom in history is under way. Over half of the world's infrastructure investment is now taking place in emerging economies, where sales of excavators have risen more than fivefold since 2000. In total, emerging economies are likely to spend an estimated $1.2 trillion on roads, railways, electricity, telecommunications and other projects this year, equivalent to 6% of their combined GDPs—twice the average infrastructure-investment ratio in developed economies. Largely as a result, total fixed investment in emerging economies could increase by a staggering 16% in real terms this year, according to HSBC, whereas in rich economies it is forecast to be flat. Such investment will help support economic growth this year as America's economy stalls—and for many years to come.

CFN410.gif


Compounding this year's figure, Morgan Stanley predicts that emerging economies will spend $22 trillion (in today's prices) on infrastructure over the next ten years, of which China will account for 43% (see left-hand chart). China is already spending around 12% of its GDP on infrastructure. Indeed, China has spent more (in real terms) in the past five years than in the whole of the 20th century. Last year Brazil launched a four-year plan to spend $300 billion to modernise its road network, power plants and ports. The Indian government's latest five-year plan has ambitiously pencilled in nearly $500 billion in infrastructure projects. Russia, the Gulf states and other oil exporters are all pouring part of their higher oil revenues into fixed investment.

Good infrastructure has always played a leading role in economic development, from the roads and aqueducts of ancient Rome to Britain's railway boom in the mid-19th century. But never before has infrastructure spending been so large as a share of world GDP. This is partly because more countries are now industrialising than ever before, but also because China and others are investing at a much brisker pace than rich economies ever did. Even at the peak of Britain's railway mania in the 1840s, total infrastructure investment was only around 5% of GDP.

Infrastructure investment can yield big economic gains. Building roads or railways immediately boosts output and jobs, but it also helps to spur future growth—provided the money is spent wisely. Better transport helps farmers to get their produce to cities, and manufacturers to export their goods overseas. Countries with the lowest transport costs tend to be more open to foreign trade and so enjoy faster growth. Clean water and sanitation also raise the quality of human capital, thereby lifting labour productivity. The World Bank estimates that a 1% increase in a country's infrastructure stock is associated with a 1% increase in the level of GDP. Other studies have concluded that East Asia's much higher investment in infrastructure explains a large part of its faster growth than Latin America.

A recent report by Goldman Sachs argues that infrastructure spending is not just a cause of economic growth, but a consequence of it. As people get richer and more of them live in towns, the demand for electricity, transport, sanitation and housing increases. This mutually reinforcing relationship leads to higher investment and growth. The bank has developed a model that uses expected growth in income, urbanisation and population to forecast future infrastructure demands.

Urbanisation has the biggest impact on electricity requirements. Goldman calculates that a 1% increase in the share of people living in cities leads to a 1.8% increase in demand for installed capacity. A 1% rise in income per head leads to a 0.5% increase in demand. Putting this together, electricity capacity may have to surge by 140% in China and by 80% in India over the next decade (see right-hand chart). Air travel—and hence airports—will see the fastest growth in demand, because it is by far the most sensitive to income: a 1% increase in income per person leads to a 1.4% increase in the number of passengers travelling by air. The number of air passengers could jump by more than 350% in China and by 200% in India over the next decade.

China's faster growth in income per head and its more rapid pace of urbanisation mean that it is likely to pull even further ahead of India on most infrastructure measures. China could add 13 times as many fixed-line phones as India over the decade, seven times as many air passengers and six times as much electricity capacity. Brazil and Russia, which are already much more urbanised and relatively richer (implying slower growth in income), will also see more modest growth in infrastructure.

Economics focus: Building BRICs of growth | The Economist
 
.
The inclusion of Pakistan in the list was unwarranted.
It we look at Pakistan's future it is not bleak at all, rather very promising.
Just imagine a country where there is No Gas, no oil, no electricity, half of country going through civil war, in finencial Capital is under seige of cartels and gangsters, yet country still devloping at 3.7 even though world economy is in worst state.

This fact puzzle many economists not only inside pakistan but also outside. Some after failing to understand why it is so, blame that figures are wrong.

But real Awnser lies in growing middle class, and with some massive infrastructure under devlopment projects, huge influx of Overseas pakistanis investment.

Only hurdle that obstruct Pakistan rapid growth is WOT, we have to finish it quickly enough to rise. other problems are of secondary nature, they can be dealt with passage of time.
Pakistan needs only 10 15 yrs and it will be in E7(rather E8)
regards
 
.
fukk, india doesnt uses its population properly as china or else we could have been sitting just beside china ryt now...damn....

off topic: can somebody explain me how to patent your innovation?...i got 3 ideas but dont know how to do it...
 
.
Pakistan's constant presence on such lists is the most ominous sign of all when it comes to economic prosperity. From the 1960s till today, Pakistan has been expected by economists with diverse view points, to be part of the next group of emerging nations. Looked at, from a purely statistical point of view, our nation is a potential economic gold mine: an immense youthful population, hugely important strategic location, and neighbor to the two economic giants of the upcoming era. So for a country of such great potential to produce economic growth figures that are consistently below 5% is terrible.

We have all the tools, yet have failed over and over again. Few countries have the near perfect mix of population and location that allows them to turn around their fortunes in a short time period. Pakistan has had it from the beginning and has failed over 60 years. Terrorism exists today, it did not 20 years ago when growth was hardly better; corrupt leaders exist today, but the Indians and Chinese have them too, while they move forward...we fail continuously in very favorable circumstances, relative to other developing nations.

Instead of making us feel good about ourselves, we should question, why haven't we been promoted to the list of developed nation?...why are we still potentially emerging? Our failure is a product of the failure of every Pakistani. Blaming the government is too simplistic and unrealistic...they are from among us and they unfortunately fail like us. They are in power because we have never attempted to prevent them gaining power...just as importantly, even the greatest leader would fail if asked to build a nation with no tax revenue from the working class.

but mexico is besides a huge economy like USA but still its under developed...and china is using pakistan as a tool against india...after they use you, they will throw pakistan, they wont care for you...they are very cunning...we look like you and had same past...we understand you better but still you guys feel inferior to us..:unsure:
 
.
but mexico is besides a huge economy like USA but still its under developed...and china is using pakistan as a tool against india...after they use you, they will throw pakistan, they wont care for you...they are very cunning...we look like you and had same past...we understand you better but still you guys feel inferior to us..:unsure:


lol......and lol.......and lol
 
.
The inclusion of Pakistan in the list was unwarranted.
It we look at Pakistan's future it is not bleak at all, rather very promising.
Just imagine a country where there is No Gas, no oil, no electricity, half of country going through civil war, in finencial Capital is under seige of cartels and gangsters, yet country still devloping at 3.7 even though world economy is in worst state.

This fact puzzle many economists not only inside pakistan but also outside. Some after failing to understand why it is so, blame that figures are wrong.

But real Awnser lies in growing middle class, and with some massive infrastructure under devlopment projects, huge influx of Overseas pakistanis investment.

Only hurdle that obstruct Pakistan rapid growth is WOT, we have to finish it quickly enough to rise. other problems are of secondary nature, they can be dealt with passage of time.
Pakistan needs only 10 15 yrs and it will be in E7(rather E8)
regards

to get this, Pakistan need two very first things, which are little hard but within capabilities of Pakistan:

1st, remove the violence from Pakistan which is of no use, not worth, specially in the financial capital Karachi, target killing etc is of no use. removing extrimism and adopting an economic model/social model of Turkey is also important to be with Turkey in E7 :agree:

2nd, have IP pipeline as soon as possible. no industry can run without proper power supply and there can't be a better and cheaper energy supply to pakistan, like from Iran throgh IP pipeline. Gas is so much useful that its first much cheaper than oil, can be used to run vehicle/power generation all and being supplied from the next door at a much cheaper price than market rates :enjoy:

and then, no power of the world may stop Pakistan to get at least above 6% growth rate on long term, with opportunity to touch 8% to 10% in future also :tup:
 
.
Great thread Hello_10

Emerging markets are vital for the sustainability of world progress, and these countries will determine the future of the world.
China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia and Turkey are indeed the most promising countries when we look at current growth and development in their infrastructural sector. These countries need to work closer, BRIC is not sufficient at all. Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey shows much more promise than India for example. Russia and Turkey needs to work closer on many aspects: geopolitical problems in Eurasia and Middle East should definitely be worked out by these two countries instead of including EU and USA into every damn matter. Economical: Many ex Soviet countries are Turkic hence inviting Turkey to the Shanghai cooperation will only do good to this. Turkey is like Russia an Asian country, which we are proud of.

As for Pakistan. Pakistan needs immediately to get rid of its corrupt politicians and other officials. You mates got election soon, we need to see a positive result. Imran Khan looks promising, and i am sure he will do good. AKP could be a very good model for PTI. Turkey should support Pakistan after your election, and focus on helping in your infrastructural and political clean-up/development. If we do this, Pakistan can rise.

Also Pakistan must work things out with India. Face the truth mates, you are the weak part in this duel. We have seen how the weak parts always suffer. In our case Greece thought it could keep up with Turkey but failed miserably. You guys must work with India, only then will Pakistan truly find peace in its society and neighbors. I know you guys have a long history with wars and conflicts. But again, true triumph comes in peace and cooperation.
 
.
Great thread Hello_10

Emerging markets are vital for the sustainability of world progress, and these countries will determine the future of the world.
China, India, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Indonesia and Turkey are indeed the most promising countries when we look at current growth and development in their infrastructural sector. These countries need to work closer, BRIC is not sufficient at all. Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey shows much more promise than India for example. Russia and Turkey needs to work closer on many aspects: geopolitical problems in Eurasia and Middle East should definitely be worked out by these two countries instead of including EU and USA into every damn matter. Economical: Many ex Soviet countries are Turkic hence inviting Turkey to the Shanghai cooperation will only do good to this. Turkey is like Russia an Asian country, which we are proud of.

As for Pakistan. Pakistan needs immediately to get rid of its corrupt politicians and other officials. You mates got election soon, we need to see a positive result. Imran Khan looks promising, and i am sure he will do good. AKP could be a very good model for PTI. Turkey should support Pakistan after your election, and focus on helping in your infrastructural and political clean-up/development. If we do this, Pakistan can rise.

Also Pakistan must work things out with India. Face the truth mates, you are the weak part in this duel. We have seen how the weak parts always suffer. In our case Greece thought it could keep up with Turkey but failed miserably. You guys must work with India, only then will Pakistan truly find peace in its society and neighbors. I know you guys have a long history with wars and conflicts. But again, true triumph comes in peace and cooperation.

good post :tup:
 
.
How come there are lot of trolls & troll posts in this thread & no action against them? Why would any one be worried that why is this country in this list or not?

I'll tell you why...

...because all those countries on that list, except one, have worked their a$$ off to get to where they are. Their people have burnt their blood, paid taxes by cutting down the food on their tables.

...and when a zilch of a failed state with nearly no growth, near bottom low literacy rate, nearly zero manufacturing base, one of the worst tax-GDP ratios in the world makes it to a list of the top economies of the world, it's obviously going to make the others who worked for it, bad.

When a fisaddi kid makes it to the top position on the basis of cheating in the exams, the meritorious toppers are obviously going to feel bad.

Your only claim to a spot on that elite club is that this is a Pakistani website. That's it.

You wanna join the club? Work your a$$ off and pay your taxes.

Now you know why it feels bad.
 
.
Global Innovation Index rankings

Country/Economy - Score (0–100) - Rank

China - 45.4 - 34
Russian Federation - 37.9 - 51
South Africa - 37.4 - 54
Brazil - 36.6 - 58
India - 35.7 - 64
Turkey - 34.1 - 74
Mexico - 32.9 - 79
Indonesia - 28.1 - 100
Pakistan - 23.1 - 133

http://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii/main/fullreport/files/Global Innovation Index 2012.pdf

Innovation Efficiency Index, top 10

fngsx3.jpg

India slips to 64th on global innovation index

Country climbs seven notches in innovation efficiency; stands second

India witnessed a drop in the global innovation index (GII) ranking of this year to 64th position from 62nd last year. It stood lowest among the BRICS nations in the 2012 index.

However, the country improved its position in innovation efficiency from 9th position to second—just behind China. This index exhibits countries that are innovating despite a weaker innovation environment.

As for GII, Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa are ranked at 58th, 51st, 34th and 54th positions respectively. At the same time, these countries were ranked at 38th, 43rd, 1st and 116th positions in terms of innovation efficiency.

Switzerland, Sweden and Singapore secured the top three places in the GII rankings.

The Global Innovation Index 2012 was released on Tuesday by France-based international business school INSEAD and World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), a specialised agency of the United Nations, along with the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII).

The Index ranks 141 countries/economies on the basis of their innovation capabilities and results.

The report notes a need for the BRIC countries to invest further in their innovation capabilities to live up to their expected potential.

China’s performance on the key knowledge and technology outputs pillar is outpaced only by Switzerland, Sweden, Singapore, and Finland.

However, the report notes that both China and India have weaknesses in their innovation infrastructure and environment. The report also notes that Brazil has suffered the largest drop among the BRICs.

“Every country can aspire to be an innovation-driven economy,” said CII director-general Chandrajit Banerjee. “The more resource-constrained an economy is, the more prone to innovation it actually can be. Importantly, innovation is about acts which improve everyday lives and a journey towards faster-sustainable-inclusive-growth.”

The study shows that the dynamics of innovation continue to be affected by the emergence of new successful innovators. It can be seen by the range of countries across continents in the top 20 GII ranking, as well as the good performances of certain emerging countries. They include Latvia, Malaysia, China, Montenegro, Serbia, Republic of Moldova, Jordan, Ukraine, India, Mongolia, Armenia, Georgia, Namibia, Viet Nam, Swaziland, Paraguay, Ghana and Senegal, besides low-income countries of Kenya and Zimbabwe.

“The downward pressure on investment in innovation exerted by the current crisis must be resisted,” WIPO Director General Francis Gurry said. “Otherwise we risk durable damage to countries’ productive capacities. This is the time for forward-looking policies to lay the foundations for future prosperity.”

India slips to 64th on global innovation index
 
.
Mumbai offers best fin services environment

NEW DELHI: Among important centres of commerce in emerging countries, Mumbai offers the best financial services environment, ahead of Shanghai and Kuala Lumpur, say a Mastercard survey.

"In terms of financial services environment, Mumbai ranks No 1 among all 65 cities covered by the index. It received the top score in the dimension of banking services and currency exchange regulations, and ranked highly on the volume of financial services traded," it said. Other important financial services providers among the emerging economies include Johannesburg, Sao Paulo, Moscow and Bangkok.

In addition to Mumbai, seven other cities including New Delhi, Bangalore, Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Pune, Ahmedabad and Coimbatore found mention in the 65 important commercial centres in the emerging markets. As against eight cities from India, 15 Chinese cities figured in the Mastercard survey.

Among the centres providing commercial connectivity, New Delhi was ranked sixth, below Shanghai, Bangkok, Moscow and Sao Paulo. In terms of overall ranking Shanghai tops the list followed by Beijing and Budapest, while Mumbai was ranked at 19th place and New Delhi at 28th position.

Among the other Indian cities, Bangalore was placed at 38th position, followed by Chennai (39), Hyderabad (46), Kolkata (48), Pune (52), Ahmedabad (55) and Coimbatore (54).

The Mastercard ranking is based on eight parameters including economic and commercial environment, economic growth and development, business environment, financial services environment, commercial connectivity, education and it connectivity, quality of urban life and risk and security. The Indian cities did well in risk and security, with Bangalore, Hyderabad and Coimbatore figuring in the top 10.

The emerging centres are critical to the evolution of the emerging economies in which they are located and to the future of commerce globally, the study said. "As the global economy enters challenging times, emerging markets will become increasingly important to global economic growth," Mastercard worldwide Asia Pacific economic advisor Yuwa Hedrick-wong said.
Mumbai offers best fin services environment - Economic Times

Emerging Markets Index 2008 top 65

1. Shanghai
2. Beijing
3. Budapest
4. Kuala Lumpur
5. Santiago
6. Guangzhou
7. Mexico City
8. Warsaw
9. Bangkok
10. Shenzhen
11. Johannesburg
12. São Paulo
13. Buenos Aires
14. Moscow
15. Istanbul

16. Xiamen
17. Chengdu
18. Dalian
19. Mumbai
20. Tianjin
21. Nanjing
22. Hangzhou
23. Wuhan
24. Chongqing
25. Qingdao
26. Xi'an
27. Harbin
28. Chennai
29. Monterrey
30. Sofia
31. Montevideo
32. Bucharest
33. Cape Town
34. Lima
35. Bogota
36. Rio de Janeiro
37. Durban
38. New Delhi
39. Bangalore
40. Tunis
41. St. Petersburg
42. Brasilia
43. Jakarta
44. Cairo
45. Manila
46. Hyderabad
47. Recife
48. Kolkata
49. Curitiba
50. Ankara
51. Santo Domingo
52. Pune
53. Casablanca
54. Coimbatore
55. Ahmedabad

56. Ho Chi Minh City
57. Kiev
58. Medellin
59. Yekaterinburg
60. Beirut
61. Caracas
62. Novosibirsk
63. Nairobi
64. Karachi
65. Dakar

Emerging Markets Index - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.
Back
Top Bottom