What's new

Lankan Tamils to break coconuts for Hillary

Sinhala script has originated from the Brahmi script. You can call it Tamil Brahmi if you like to. It is just the way it is. It doesn't mean Tamils were native inhabitants of Sri Lanka.

It is obvious that Sinhalese were highly influenced by the Tamil culture. But it doesn't mean Tamils were the original inhabitants of the island. There are no evidence to support such a theory. Tamilnadu being just few kilometers away from Sri Lanka is not a justifiable evidence. Otherwise England should belong to French.

The Celts and Anglo Saxons occupying England had their origins in Europe -
The Celts were a group of tribal societies tied by similar language, religion and culture in Iron Age and Medieval Europe. Celtic culture began to develop as early as 1200 BC and spread through migration to the British Isles, France and other parts of Europe.“Celtic" refers to people descended from one of the current Celtic regions on the western extremities of Europe. Each of these regions has retained much of its indigenous culture and distinctive language throughout the centuries..

http://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/a-guide-to-identifying-the-celtic-regions

the above can be applied to Ceylon's history

Due geographical proximity Tamils' cultural and racial influence on Sinhala cannot be denied by Sinhala Utranationalists e.g Sinhalas of the Karava/Govigama caste (i.e 70 % of the Sinhala pop) were ex-Pandyans

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Karavas
 
.
The Celts and Anglo Saxons occupying England had their origins in Europe -

http://www.irishcentral.com/roots/history/a-guide-to-identifying-the-celtic-regions

the above can be applied to Ceylon's history

Due geographical proximity Tamils' cultural and racial influence on Sinhala cannot be denied by Sinhala Utranationalists e.g Sinhalas of the Karava/Govigama caste (i.e 70 % of the Sinhala pop) were ex-Pandyans

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Karavas

Of course Sinhalese ancestors came from India very long ago. There is no denying of that fact. But that doesn't mean Sri Lanka had a independent Tamil homeland that existed until the time of British. That is a hoax.
 
.
Of course Sinhalese ancestors came from India very long ago. There is no denying of that fact. But that doesn't mean Sri Lanka had a independent Tamil homeland that existed until the time of British. That is a hoax.

The hoax is what the co-called Sinhala 'historians' feed Sinhalas nationalists apart from the Sinhala regime sponsored fabrication and destruction of history {i.e burning Jaffna Public library, destroying (pre Sinhala) - Tamil names of villages / towns etc}

The Sinhala (similar to Keralites of the Chera kingdom ) race and identity, never existed before the 8th AD. The religious syncretism of Sinhala Buddhists confirms the evolution of the Sinhala 'race'

Have you ever pondered why - 'Sinhala" kings were constantly taking Pandyan (or Pandu in Pali) brides ? With Pandyan royal blood from the inception of Vijaya to the last reigning Sinhala Kandyan king, Kannusamy (or Vikrama Rajasinghe) - Sinhala kingdoms were vassal state of the mighty Pandyas /Nayaks/Vijayanagar
 
Last edited:
.
Sinhala (similar to Keralites) race and identity
It is a gross generalization. Srilanka, Maldives may be more similar in that case. May be they copied Malayali/Malabari food and culture owing to Tellicherry based hoteliers who made puttu, appam and other Kerala foods popular in Ceylon. Not vice versa. Tamils, Moors, Sinhala are all the same people for outsiders. Cannot be distinguished. Assimilate and tolerate each other and make Ceylon a developed country. Kill the ultra Tamil and Sinhala nationalism.

About Srilanka:
The Singhalese of the south of Ceylon speak a fundamentally Aryan language. They have certain traits in common with the Indo-Afghans and the Assyroids, but their type has been affected by the neighbourhood of a small mysterious tribe, that of the Veddahs, driven back into the mountains of the south-west of Ceylon. This is the remnant of a very primitive population whose physical type approximates nearest to the platyrhine variety of the Dravidian race, at the same time presenting certain peculiarities. The Veddahs are monogamous; they live in caves or under shelters of boughs, hiding themselves even from the Singhalese.
 
Last edited:
.
The hoax is what the co-called Sinhala 'historians' feed Sinhalas nationalists apart from the Sinhala regime sponsored fabrication and destruction of history {i.e burning Jaffna Public library, destroying (pre Sinhala) - Tamil names of villages / towns etc}

The Sinhala (similar to Keralites of the Chera kingdom ) race and identity, never existed before the 8th AD. The religious syncretism of Sinhala Buddhists confirms the evolution of the Sinhala 'race'

Have you ever pondered why - 'Sinhala" kings were constantly taking Pandyan (or Pandu in Pali) brides ? With Pandyan royal blood from the inception of Vijaya to the last reigning Sinhala Kandyan king, Kannusamy (or Vikrama Rajasinghe) - Sinhala kingdoms were vassal state of the mighty Pandyas /Nayaks/Vijayanagar

There is no hoax about Sinhala history. It has been thoroughly checked and affirmed by British and German scholars to name a few with indisputable evidences. The hoax is what the Tamils are perpetuating in-order to claim a separate state.

Burning of a Jaffna library was a isolated incident. It has no connection with distortion of history.

Sinhala language even predates the 8th century AD dateline. Moreover the monuments and the rich history of Sinhalese which have created some unique structures no where else to be found any where around the globe testifies to it.

Pandyan kingdom and Sinhalese kingdom shared a friendly relationship through 1000s of years. No side claimed to be superior to each during those times. Pandyans actively invaded the island during 13th century only. There it is pretty hilarious that you claim Pandyas were the overloads of Sinhalese.

I also have a question regarding your Pandyan theory. If Sinhalese were vassals of Pandyans, did Tamil eelam was also part of the Pandyan kingdom? If so where did it mention like wise? Did Pandyans ever acknowledged that?
 
.
This is a stupid joke. I used to have a maid from Sri Lanka when i was a kid and her name was Inoka. I rememebered her complexion was of a different lighter brownish tone than the Tamils in Singapore(who is of the same stock from those in Tamil Nadu and who's complexion were close to charcoal black or very dark brown)

something like this:

Sinhalese women
Ayubowan.jpg


Tamil women
timthumb.php


Local Tamil men and women in Singapore:
dw-tamil-160327.jpg


Tamil girls in Singapore:
Msura.JPG
What does a videshi like you know about this region? Enoki was probably a Burgher or a Moor. Sinhalese look like this:
tumblr_n70hrp1Tkf1qducpxo1_1280.jpg


Which is quite similar to Andamanese
369680EE00000578-3707766-image-a-2_1469485465365.jpg

What does a videshi like you know about this region? Enoki was probably a Burgher or a Moor. Sinhalese look like this:
tumblr_n70hrp1Tkf1qducpxo1_1280.jpg


Which is quite similar to Andamanese
369680EE00000578-3707766-image-a-2_1469485465365.jpg

What does a videshi like you know about this region? Enoki was probably a Burgher or a Moor. Sinhalese look like this:
tumblr_n70hrp1Tkf1qducpxo1_1280.jpg


Which is quite similar to Andamanese
369680EE00000578-3707766-image-a-2_1469485465365.jpg
These are photos of srilankan tamils. And african decendent people in sirambiadi, puttalam srilanka. Slightly tamils are darker than sinhalese. This shows the difference between two communities. Tamils post this type of photos to prove their eelam theories, To show our people are dravidan as them. The one who posted those things got brainwashed by those racist nonsense.
vithana_2.jpg
main-qimg-46abeb31346da04650a06e1fbfd0b66f-c.jpg
tamilsinhalese3.jpg
 
.
Aint nobody care nothin about skin colour fam. we got black and brown people deal wit it
 
.
Well i replied to that Ladyboy figure who insulted us ,anyway most south asians have mixed colors pale, brown , black. There's no doubt.
Aint nobody care nothin about skin colour fam. we got black and brown people deal wit it
ie
Aint nobody care nothin about skin colour fam. we got black and brown people deal wit it[/Q
Aint nobody care nothin about skin colour fam. we got black and brown people deal wit it
well
 
Last edited:
.
Well i replied to that girlboy figure who insulted us ,anyway most south asians have mixed colors pale, brown , black. There's no doubt.
yh i get you fam. i juat couldnt care less about skin colour. most of the men from neighbouring countries to the north i met are pussies. they stay indoors and use skin colour changing creams. smh

I think we are better built and more sporty than them
 
.
These are photos of srilankan tamils. And african decendent people in sirambiadi, puttalam srilanka. Slightly tamils are darker than sinhalese. This shows the difference between two communities. Tamils post this type of photos to prove their eelam theories, To show our people are dravidan as them. The one who posted those things got brainwashed by those racist nonsense.

This is how Sri Lanka's original surviving natives look like- Veddas (Nagas) belonging to the Dravidian stock
001.jpg


th


present Sinhalas are not representative of the original inhabitants - they are a mix bag e.g Bengalis/Telugus (Madurai Nayaks)/native/Arabs etc.

The same applies to Sinhala culture - e.g Language Aryan Pali mix Dravidian Tamil

Sinhala script root

8908058_f520.jpg
 
.
This is how Sri Lanka's original surviving natives look like- Veddas (Nagas) belonging to the Dravidian stock
001.jpg


th


present Sinhalas are not representative of the original inhabitants - they are a mix bag e.g Bengalis/Telugus (Madurai Nayaks)/native/Arabs etc.

The same applies to Sinhala culture - e.g Language Aryan Pali mix Dravidian Tamil

Sinhala script root

8908058_f520.jpg
True talk but aint gonna matter fam. we sinhalese and tamils are the same shit. we shouldnt fight like apes in a cage.
 
.
This is how Sri Lanka's original surviving natives look like- Veddas (Nagas) belonging to the Dravidian stock
001.jpg


th


present Sinhalas are not representative of the original inhabitants - they are a mix bag e.g Bengalis/Telugus (Madurai Nayaks)/native/Arabs etc.

The same applies to Sinhala culture - e.g Language Aryan Pali mix Dravidian Tamil

Sinhala script root

8908058_f520.jpg
Tams
This is how Sri Lanka's original surviving natives look like- Veddas (Nagas) belonging to the Dravidian stock
001.jpg


th


present Sinhalas are not representative of the original inhabitants - they are a mix bag e.g Bengalis/Telugus (Madurai Nayaks)/native/Arabs etc.

The same applies to Sinhala culture - e.g Language Aryan Pali mix Dravidian Tamil

Sinhala script root

8908058_f520.jpg
Tamils slightly darker because of their geograpical distribution, genetic studies shows that both sinhalese and srilankan tamils got influenced from bengali genetics

This is how Sri Lanka's original surviving natives look like- Veddas (Nagas) belonging to the Dravidian stock
001.jpg


th


present Sinhalas are not representative of the original inhabitants - they are a mix bag e.g Bengalis/Telugus (Madurai Nayaks)/native/Arabs etc.

The same applies to Sinhala culture - e.g Language Aryan Pali mix Dravidian Tamil

Sinhala script root

8908058_f520.jpg
Here

This is how Sri Lanka's original surviving natives look like- Veddas (Nagas) belonging to the Dravidian stock
001.jpg


th


present Sinhalas are not representative of the original inhabitants - they are a mix bag e.g Bengalis/Telugus (Madurai Nayaks)/native/Arabs etc.

The same applies to Sinhala culture - e.g Language Aryan Pali mix Dravidian Tamil

Sinhala script root

8908058_f520.jpg
Here
Genetic_admixture_of_Sinhalese_by_Papiha (3).PNG
Sri_Lankan_Tamil_Admixture (1).PNG
 
. . . .
Back
Top Bottom