What's new

Land acquired for Indian economic zones.

But, even then, we have full employment in the country

LOL, a GDDS country (that cannot make it to The Economist's weekly appendix unlike even Pakistan) has world standard employment information....a cruel funny joke.

Not to mention what unemployment and underemployment are.

In a couple of years, TFR hasn't changed dramatically in India and is holding steady at ~2.4 give or take one/two decimal points.

IF BD factors in its illegals its TFR will probably be much closer to Pakistan than India. BD Census is a POS document compromised to begin with by the abomination that is BBS that fears accepting a simple ESCAP assessment for a reason.

Not to mention you have a chotolok idea of what stagnation is, THIS is stagnation given the low base + BBS fakery you lot have to begin with:

HDI.jpg
 
.
IF BD factors in its illegals its TFR will probably be much closer to Pakistan than India. BD Census is a POS document compromised to begin with by the abomination that is BBS that fears accepting a simple ESCAP assessment for a reason.

Not to mention you have a chotolok idea of what stagnation is, THIS is stagnation given the low base + BBS fakery you lot have to begin with:

View attachment 462220

TFR is related to migration?

:cheesy::disagree::woot::cuckoo:
 
.
TFR is related to migration?

:cheesy::disagree::woot::cuckoo:

Do you understand how TFR calculations are done? What happens if people pick up and leave willy nilly with their rabbit number of kids and are not counted by the census of the illegal source country, but counted in the destination? Especially given what kind of particular TFR these ppl have compared to the population as whole to begin with. I mean these types are desperate enough to do Felani style shenanigans after all.

Do some basic math and logic kiddo.

I mean heck you exported a good 3 million illegals or so to Pakistan, kids and everything, well after 1971 during the 80s and early 90s....and far in excess of that to India for much longer time period. @django

With some extra BBS mathamagic on top you can have a nice low TFR for the feel......but then it all comes shattering down when we see what the BD group TFR is in say the UK relative to everyone else:

http://iussp2009.princeton.edu/papers/93139

That 3rd party, non-BBS reality check.

@gslv mk3
 
. . .
Indians are a joke in other countries.

Wanna see a real joke? Look at the mirror. Or just look at this if you cant stand that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income

1. Indian American : $101,390
2. Jewish American : $97,500
3. Taiwanese American : $85,566

(SCROLL DOWN A LONG LONG WAY)

87.Nepali American : $44,677[4]
88. Bangladeshi American : $44,512[4]
89. Afghan American : $43,838[2]
90. Subsaharan African : $43,682[2]

Bunny wabbiting in UK when BBS is not allowed near the numbers and paper:

TFR.jpg


One for the road:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/two-...-30-under-30-list.550638/page-2#post-10363946
 
.
Please have a look at UN data established in 2015. In a couple of years, TFR hasn't changed dramatically in India and is holding steady at ~2.4 give or take one/two decimal points.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN

https://knoema.com/atlas/Bangladesh/topics/Demographics/Fertility/Fertility-rate

https://knoema.com/atlas/India/Fertility-rate

India's is around 2.43 from all data I have seen and Bangladesh' rate is replacement rate (2.1) essentially.

There goes the Sanghi concept of 'Bangladeshis breeding like rabbits' out the window....Indians please go back to accusing Pakistan of a 'human time-bomb in the making' (still at 3.5).

https://knoema.com/atlas/Pakistan/Fertility-rate

I don't know where World Bank gets its data from, Acc to Niti AAyog's SRS report the TFR of India dropped below 2.4 in 2012. In 2016 we had a TFR of 2.3. This is supported by NHFS-4 report conducted by Health Minnistry, it placed India's TFR at 2.2 for 2016.

http://niti.gov.in/content/total-fertility-rate-tfr-birth-woman#

https://community.data.gov.in/stateut-wise-total-fertility-rate-during-2015-16-nfhs-4/

The TFR of India would be much lower, if not for the states like Bihar which had a TFR of > 3.

Pakistan is worse, the ratio of population between India and Pakistan will fall below 6 in the next 8 - 10 yrs.
 
Last edited:
.
Wanna see a real joke? Look at the mirror. Or just look at this if you cant stand that:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income

1. Indian American : $101,390
2. Jewish American : $97,500
3. Taiwanese American : $85,566

(SCROLL DOWN A LONG LONG WAY)

87.Nepali American : $44,677[4]
88. Bangladeshi American : $44,512[4]
89. Afghan American : $43,838[2]
90. Subsaharan African : $43,682[2]

Bunny wabbiting in UK when BBS is not allowed near the numbers and paper:

View attachment 462240

One for the road:

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/two-...-30-under-30-list.550638/page-2#post-10363946

Nice misrepresentation from quoting some ullu wiki stats as usual. I don't usually grace your posts with a reply - but this is pretty blatant.

For everyone else's (the naive) benefit I am compelled to say we are comparing apples to oranges.

Bangladeshis in New York comprise uneducated unskilled folks in huge numbers whose income,

1. Will naturally be lower than your H1B's because of lack of education, and
2. Is mostly undeclared. Most of the time Bangladeshi lower middle class folks don't even declare half their income.

So yeah - keep feeling smug. Most of these lower middle class Bangladeshis living in Jackson Heights have more money and property than your New Jersey H1B's boasting about $100,000 income could ever fathom....:lol:

And don't bother replying - I could care less.

Now back to the topic, shall we? JEEZ!
 
Last edited:
.
Nice misrepresentation from quoting some ullu wiki stats as usual. I don't usually grace your turd posts with a reply - but this is pretty blatant.

For everyone else's (the naive) benefit I am compelled to say we are comparing apples to oranges.

Bangladeshis in New York comprise uneducated unskilled folks in huge numbers whose income,

1. Will naturally be lower than your H1B's because of lack of education, and
2. Most of the time Bangladeshi lower middle class folks don't even declare half their income.

:rofl: :rofl:.

Finding excuses for each & everything is the only thing you are good at...


http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...unity-poorer-blacks-latinos-article-1.1075313
 
Last edited:
.
.
It's really sad to see the way some of the senior and knowledgeable Indian members whom I really like have been regularly derailing every single Bangladesh related thread. Really unfortunate.

Sadly I haven't seen any of them in India vs China thread where Indian cities like Mumbai or Delhi was getting compared with Shanghai or other Chinese cities. I wonder why?

I don't mind criticism. But if every single thread gets derailed by nonsensical rant, it becomes tedious and boring.
 
. .
Says the troll who made the first off-topic troll post in this thread!!

And now you are crying victim ?

@Neptune_

No, not crying. Just stating that I expect better from u guys. In such a positive thread like this we r talking about all sorts of unrelated stupid things and throwing mud at each other.

Then again, perhaps this is the norm of this forum. After all i see every single thread about India to get flooded with piss drinking, rape and open defection related posts. U r just keeping up with the trend. Carry on my friend :-)
 
.
Says the troll who made the first off-topic troll post in this thread!!

And now you are crying victim ?

@Neptune_
Pakistanis routinely say far worse things about India badmouthing religion, I don't see you guys going there and rebutting them, maybe you are not man enough to face them.
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom