What's new

Lahore owes Hindu philanthropist Ganga Ram more than it would care to admit

Devil Soul

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
22,931
Reaction score
45
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Lahore owes Hindu philanthropist Ganga Ram more than it would care to admit
Haroon KhalidApril 25, 2018
Facebook Count5
Twitter Share

0
5ae05c66c2485.jpg


As I entered the samadhi of Sir Ganga Ram in Lahore, I took out my phone to photograph the small yellow, domed structure standing on one side of a vast enclosure.

I managed to sneak in a couple of photographs before a middle-aged man jumped up from his chair under the shade of a tree near the building, wagged his finger, and asked me to stop.

He was a government official posted here to look after the memorial where the ashes of the philanthropist who designed and built several of Lahore’s landmarks are interred.

Indeed, his tenure as the executive engineer of Lahore towards the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, is now referred to as the "Ganga Ram architectural period".

Traveling around Pakistan, I have become accustomed to the attitude of government officials at historical structures. I have often been barred from photographing these buildings.

Sometimes, the officials relent when I tell them I need the photographs for a journalistic assignment, but even that does not always work.

5ae05ff714e0e.jpg

The samadhi of Ganga Ram. —Haroon Khalid


This official was adamant. He told me to go to the office of the Evacuee Trust Property Board, the department responsible for looking after the abandoned properties of non-Muslims in Pakistan, including temples and gurdwaras, and return with permission to take photographs. I did not do so as I already had a few pictures of the samadhi from one of my earlier visits.

But I continue to be baffled by the government’s policy of not allowing people to photograph some historical structures that it is in charge of.

An old man who lives in a hut behind the samadhi, within its enclosure, walked up to me and gave me a guided a tour. He told me how the entire enclosure had been encroached upon.

It had housed several refugees of Partition till the 1980s, when the government decided to take charge and renovate the structure. Only one house was permitted — that of the old man, as he was given the responsibility of guarding the building.

He told me how, in the name of renovation, a pool that was constructed along with the samadhi, was also filled with earth, becoming the courtyard upon which we now stood. The walls outside were painted, while marble was laid on the floor and on the building’s interior walls.

The samadhi stood at the centre of a hall. It was a little platform tiled with marble, one side of which bore a brief history of Ganga Ram, along with his photograph in which he wore a suit and a hat. He died in London in 1927.

5ae060317edaf.jpg

The samadhi of Ganga Ram. —Haroon Khalid


A city transformed
Lahore, in the middle of the 19th century, was not the city we know today. For almost half a century it had served as the political capital of the Khalsa empire, but it was far from the provincial capital it was under the Mughals.

Its dilapidated Mughal mausoleums and remains of the vast Mughal gardens that were unkempt and encroached upon reflected a lost glory.

Under Maharaja Ranjit Singh, Lahore’s neighbouring city, Amritsar, had emerged as the economic hub of the empire. In the first comprehensive census of British India in 1881, the population of Lahore was 149,000 compared to 152,000 of Amritsar.

The city transformed under the colonial state that used it as a symbol of its imperial power. A narrative was crafted, of a city rising from the ashes of its Mughal past. After the turn of the century, Lahore became one of the largest cities of the Indian subcontinent.

It became a city of migrants. According to the 1911 census, 46.3 percent of its residents were those who were not born in the district.

Ganga Ram and Lahore
In many ways, the story of Ganga Ram is the story of Lahore, a city that he helped transform into the symbol of the colonial state. He too was a migrant who, after acquiring a degree in engineering, migrated to the city for better economic opportunities.

This is a time when the colonial state, in the aftermath of the war of 1857, was redefining itself. The British increasingly began appropriating indigenous Indian symbols of authority to present continuity between former empires of India and the new British Empire.

Architecture played a pivotal role in this depiction, and led to the emergence of the Indo- Saracenic tradition. In this architectural approach, an effort was made by the colonial state to incorporate traditional structural techniques with colonial architecture.

5ae063c0c659b.jpg

The Archbishop of Canterbury (second from right), the most senior bishop of the Church of England, and others at the Anglican cathedral in Lahore in 2014. —Reuters


This was a conscious effort to depict British symbols of authority in traditional visual forms for the local populace to marvel at.

Architecture was a powerful propaganda tool at the hands of the colonial state.

Lahore, along with other major cities of British India, served as the canvas upon which this narrative was painted.

The Lahore High Court, the museum, Post Office Building, Aitchison College, the Anglican Cathedral, and National College of Arts are a few of the several examples constructed following this hybrid tradition.

In these structures, balconies, columns and watchtowers, interact with domes, chattris (canopies), arches and screens.

In Lahore, all of these iconic structures were raised by Ganga Ram. Working with the colonial state, he transformed the landscape of the city to reflect the glory of this new empire.

A new city, even more glorious than the former, had been raised from the debris of its Mughal past. Lahore had a new master and its architecture was a testimony to this fact.

In many ways, the Lahore of today is a continuation of this colonial city. It continues to serve as a symbol of the state. Its Metro Bus and now the Orange Line projects are meant to be stamps of authority.

Ganga Ram helped build this narrative. He transformed the city into a proverb that it continues to be. The Lahore of today owes much more to Ganga Ram than it would care to admit.

The article was originally published on Scroll and has been reproduced with permission.


Facebook Count5
Twitter Share

0

Haroon Khalid has an academic background in Anthropology from LUMS. He has been traveling extensively around Pakistan, documenting historical and cultural heritage. He is the author of Walking with Nanak, In Search of Shiva: A study of folk religious practices in Pakistan, and A White Trail: A journey into the heart of Pakistan’s religious minorities.
 
. .
There are few pre-independence era people of faiths other than Islam are revered in Lahore. Out of them all Sir Ganga Ram is on the top of the list. An absolutely wonderful person, who was many year ahead of his time. The power plant on punjab canals is his number one feat. Horse driven train cart in Gangapur village, Balak Ram medical college aka Fatima Jinnah Medical College and not to forget Sir Ganga Ram Hospital are few of his accomplishments and his works for the public at large.

If some one ask me, who was the number 1 Punjabi in last 2000 years, i ll say Sir Ganga Ram. Maharajah Ranjeet Singh and Dullah Bhatti are next.
 
.
Maharajah Ranjeet Singh

He turned Lahore into a junkyard lol. He desecrated the Badsahi mosque by destroying parts of minarets and used it as a stables. After the British conquest they deiced to finally get the mosque restored and hand it back to Muslims. So your Punjabi hero was nothing more then a ''daku''. :)
 
.
I remember reading about ganga ram that once when he, as a child sat down on a sofa in an engineer's office, he got scolded by him,this then made him take an oath that he will become an engineer himself.

take a bow ganga ram ji
 
.
He turned Lahore into a junkyard lol. He desecrated the Badsahi mosque by destroying parts of minarets and used it as a stables. After the British conquest they deiced to finally get the mosque restored and hand it back to Muslims. So your Punjabi hero was nothing more then a ''daku''. :)
His Prime Minister and Foreign Minister were Muslims.
He introduced Panjabi Qaida, because of which 80% of Punjab was literate.
Established first proper modern army in India
Badashi mosques were destroyed in 1905 earthquake.
Since masjid was in the vicinity of fort, that was the reason it was converted into cavalry barracks.
How come other mosques were not converted into gurdawaras etc.

Please mind your language when referring to our historical leaders

BTW more mosques were destroyed by British than in any other period. Most destroyed by a Muslim contractor , Sultan Thakeydar for British barracks in mian mir cantonment
 
.
From Article:

A new city, even more glorious than the former, had been raised from the debris of its Mughal past. Lahore had a new master and its architecture was a testimony to this fact.
_________
What a shame that those who destroyed the city are worshipped and who raised the city from debris is forgotten and made to be forgotten. Let us hope that he will get due recognition and respect he deserves
 
.
**** you and your abba Ranjeet Singh. Haram di aulaad.
From your post I gather few things:
You are 14-15 years old.
You have read nothing about Punjab history.
You do not believe in discussion, you think what you know is final and correct.
But you have no arguments to make, that is why you believe in slurs.
 
.
It's sad to see us that we don't give the due respect and honour to people who developed these lands just because of what religion they followed. There's very few roads/monuments left named after Hindus.
Hell, people have gone out of their way just because they were triggered by names, there used to be this famous neighborhood in downtown Lahore called Krishan Nagar, people got so offended by by this that they changed the name to Islampura.

From your post I gather few things:
You are 14-15 years old.
You have read nothing about Punjab history.
You do not believe in discussion, you think what you know is final and correct.
But you have no arguments to make, that is why you believe in slurs.

Don't bother with him, he's some lahoris bastard which is why he's sour about us all the time.
 
.
It's sad to see us that we don't give the due respect and honour to people who developed these lands just because of what religion they followed. There's very few roads/monuments left named after Hindus.
Hell, people have gone out of their way just because they were triggered by names, there used to be this famous neighborhood in downtown Lahore called Krishan Nagar, people got so offended by by this that they changed the name to Islampura.



Don't bother with him, he's some lahoris bastard which is why he's sour about us all the time.
Agreed but Krishanagar is still called Krishannagar not Islampura.

BTW No need to call him anything
 
.
Agreed but Krishanagar is still called Krishannagar not Islampura.

BTW No need to call him anything

Lol that's what it's called by the locals because we know that's what it used to be called. But the official name now is Islampura.
 
. .
He must be one of those Pakistani Punjabis that were happy to be slaves of Sikhs.
Punjabis were always mental slaves dont you why these people keep electing Nooras again and again
they elected shahbaz sharif over 5 times what more can i say

From Article:

A new city, even more glorious than the former, had been raised from the debris of its Mughal past. Lahore had a new master and its architecture was a testimony to this fact.
_________
What a shame that those who destroyed the city are worshipped and who raised the city from debris is forgotten and made to be forgotten. Let us hope that he will get due recognition and respect he deserves
look into the mirror bigot
India at 70: Why Hindu nationalists are afraid of Mughals
Ignorance is bliss for the Right.
POLITICS
| 5-minute read | 15-08-2017

AUDREY TRUSCHKE



  • 1.73k
    Total Shares



Over the last several years, Hindu nationalists have fought - with increasing success - to remove traces of the Mughals from the Indian public sphere. In 2015, Aurangzeb Road was renamed in Delhi. Other renamings have followed, including, this year, Akbar Fort in Ajmer and Mughalsarai Railway Station in Uttar Pradesh. A second front of the Hindu nationalist war on Indian history is school textbooks. The RSS has been saffronising Indian textbooks for some time, and news broke this month that they had wiped all but a few lines on Akbar from Maharashtrian textbooks.

Hindu nationalists have offered several justifications for their sanitising efforts. Early on, they rallied against honoring tyrants or "invaders," as the Rajasthan education minister described the likes of the Indian-born Akbar. As the months and years have passed, many on the Hindu Right have offered alternative motivations that deemphasise their Islamophobia.

For instance, the recent changes to Maharashtrian textbooks have been characterised by those responsible as framing history within a "Maharashtra-centric point of view." Yogi Adityanath's government has defended its retitling of Mughalsarai Railway Station as having little to do with the Mughals and instead as an attempt to pay tribute to Deen Dayal Upadhyaya, an RSS ideologue whose name the railway station will soon bear.

haldigati_081417050344.jpg
Maharana Pratap (as he is more commonly known among historians) fought at Haldighati in 1576 against another Rajput, Raja Man Singh, who led the Mughal forces. Shivaji allied with Muslim kings - including the Mughals - on and off throughout his life.

Such flimsy justifications do little to cover up the real fuel behind the Hindu nationalist renaming frenzy: hatred of Muslims, past and present.

Hindu nationalists are arguably growing bolder in their anti-Muslim bigotry, as can be seen from the names they choose to fill the vacuum created by their erasure of the Mughals. In 2015, Aurangzeb Road was renamed APJ Abdul Kalam Road, and thus an acceptable Muslim - in Hindutva eyes - supplanted an unacceptable one. But Mughalsarai is being replaced by the name of a Hindutva man. Ajmer's Akbar Road is now known, blandly, as Ajmer Fort. Instead of learning about the Mughals, Maharashtrian school children will learn more about the myth of Shivaji (the actual history of Shivaji being largely unpalatable to current Hindutva sensibilities and so obscured). Such actions communicate the hateful view that only a narrow band of Hindu nationalists can qualify as patriots.

India's Hindu Right has never been good with history. For instance, in the lead up to the seventieth anniversary of India's independence, we have seen an uptick in desperate Hindu nationalist claims that the RSS participated in the Quit India Movement, in contravention to the real story that the RSS was somewhere between being aloof from the independence movement and collaborating with the British Empire.

Shame about opting out of the Quit India Movement is understandable, given subsequent historical events. But why is the Hindu Right unable to come to terms with the Mughals, an empire that ended 150 years ago in name and fell apart far earlier in terms of power? For the rest of the world, the Mughals are ancient history, best left to the musty shelves of libraries and the curious minds of scholars. So why are the Mughals - long ago decayed into the dust of the earth-so viscerally threatening to the 21st century Hindu Right?

mughs_062117105329_081417050116.jpg
Yogi Adityanath's government has defended its retitling of Mughalsarai Railway Station as having little to do with the Mughals.

Hindu nationalists often fail to grasp the purposes of historical study. History is not supposed to be a glory story where you only show the bits favorable to your own political viewpoint and cut out the rest. That's propaganda. History, in contrast, attempts to summarise and explain key moments, ideas, people, and trends in the past, regardless of whether we think these things were "good" or "bad."

Mughal history has things to say to modern Indians, however, and here is where the Hindu Right begins to quake in its boots. Mughal history complicates Indian identities in many ways, such as by offering alternative visions of what it meant to be Hindu. In the Mughal past, we find Hindus who helped the Mughals. Brahmins like Birbal served as advisors to Akbar, and some Rajputs fought vehemently to expand the Mughal Empire.

Some Hindus even seemed to like the Mughals or at least became enmeshed in the Mughal cultural world. For instance, the little-known Sanskrit poet Ishvaradasa praised Aurangzeb's tax policies as just. The two most famous Sanskrit intellectuals of the seventeenth century, Kavindracarya Sarasvati and Jagannatha Panditaraja, both accepted patronage, including financial payments, from Shah Jahan's court. Kavindra taught Sanskrit and Hindi texts such as the Yoga Vasishtha to members of the Mughal royal family, and Panditaraja pursued a love affair with a Muslim woman (to the chagrin of some of his contemporaries).

What kind of Hindus were these men? They were certainly little like the khaki-clad foot-soldiers of the RSS or the zealous youth of the Hindu Yuva Vahini who appear more interested in killing Muslims than working for them. People like Ishvaradasa and Kavindracarya did not even call themselves "Hindu," for this Perso-Arabic term was still primarily used by non-Hindus in the seventeenth century.

Mughal history underscores the newness of some ideas propagated by the Hindu Right. Hindu nationalists want to believe in "Akhand Bharat" for which great heroes like Maharana Pratap and Shivaji fought. The problem is, this idea of Bharat is false. Maharana Pratap (as he is more commonly known among historians) fought at Haldighati in 1576 against another Rajput, Raja Man Singh, who led the Mughal forces. Shivaji allied with Muslim kings - including the Mughals - on and off throughout his life.

Neither Maharana Pratap nor Shivaji ever fought for "India" as such or for "Hindus" as a group. In fact, Shivaji was once literally laughed out of court by Rajputs who found him uncultured in Mughal norms, which they had long ago adopted as their own. The concept of "Indian" as a national identity is, from a historian's perspective, in its infancy, measured in decades rather than centuries. "Hindus" have not widely identified themselves as such for much longer, a few hundred years at most.

The leaders are of the Hindu Right are ashamed that their religious-cum-nationalist identity lacks historical grounding, and so they create the illusion - for their followers as much as for the rest of the nation - of deep roots by rewriting the stories of people like Shivaji.

It is far easier to convince people that such mythologies are true if Indians lack knowledge about the medieval Mughal world. Ignorance is bliss for the Hindu Right.
 
.
He must be one of those Pakistani Punjabis that were happy to be slaves of Sikhs.
Well you guys are one of those Pakistanis who make judgement about other person without knowing them.
You guys are one of those Pakistanis who likes to generalize!
There are good things about a rule and there are some bad things. Same goes for Sikh rule during Ranjeet Singh, the best thing he did was the Punjabi Qaida which was compulsory for everyone. That was the reason literacy rate was high during his rule. I respect that.
Respecting an ex-monrach does not mean, I am for the unification of Punjab. However, I do agree people on both side of the Punjab are Punjabis and just like Pushtuns have association with Pushtun on Afganistan side of the border , same goes for us. I do have soft corner for Punjabis over their. However, due to different way of life, Unification is not possible nor it is feasible. But friendship is !!!!

Punjabis were always mental slaves dont you why these people keep electing Nooras again and again
they elected shahbaz sharif over 5 times what more can i say
First of all you also generalize that I am a Noon supporter. Frankly I am not. I'm a 100% Jamatiya. So please do not generalize.
Secondly, you need to respect people right to vote and elect. In my view, people give him vote because of the infrastructure development here. I agree priority should be education and health. But this is what I think, not the common voter of Punjab. Right or wrong I respect that too.

BTW Yogi Whatever is trying to erase Mughal past and we are trying to erase Sikh era, are we any different????
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom