Areesh
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 45,157
- Reaction score
- 3
- Country
- Location
Lols. You are a joke sir. First line you say father n brother should have been killed just because they are related to a terrorist (they might be innocent. terrorist usually run away from home to get training etc and live in madrassas etc).
Then you say, stop comparing Pakistan to Israel. Lols. :The measures were taken in accordance with the Frontier Crimes Regulations' (FCR) territorial responsibility clause, which states that for any mishap, the administration can take the community or family members of the perpetrator to task and punish them under a collective responsibility clause.
The same law (with a different name) is used in Israel. Both are illegal under Islam and Geneva conventions.
Lastly, you wish they were similar. There are more paradoxes in your post than hairs on Trump
There is no contradictions in what I said my dear TTP and Daesh sympathizer from Britain.
I am very clear.
1. I fully support this action.
2. I still believe Israel would have been far more brutal if it would have lost more than 50000 innocent civilians.
3. I believe Pakistan is nowhere close in defending its people when compared to Israel and hence wish we can be somewhere close to them.
If you think Pakistan is like israel. Then good. It is good we are getting some ghairat after losing 50000 innocent civilians.
I would wish Pakistan to be twice brutal to what Israel ever was.