I am not the spokesman for the Kurds. All I am saying is that they have a right for self-determination in regions where they form the vast majority of the population and should not face any oppression as they have faced in Iraq, Syria, Turkey and Iran and still do in many cases.
From what I recall of history then the Turkic nomadic immigrations from Central Asia to Anatolia occurred less than 1000 years ago. Kurds lived there previously.
The great Saladin ibn Ayyub comes to mind.
Saladin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shia Arabs have all the rights like anybody else. In fact there is only one Arab country where the Shias are the majority, Iraq, and guess what, they are ruling that country right now. Also why should Arabs give land to other Arabs from the same country? Nobody asked for such a thing even. Should Sunni Muslim Turks give land to Shia Muslim Turks?
Chechens are Caucasian peoples. Genetically closely related to the Middle East and in particular Semitic people.
The Tatars have autonomy in Russia. Although the Russian could call them small primitive and barbarian Eskimo looking Central Asian nomads. Some Russians call them that. Seen it on this forum. They could also crush them easily.
I mean do you expect the 11 to 19 MILLION Kurds in Turkey (15-25% of the entire population) to change and not want at least a autonomy?
This conflict is not my conflict all I am saying is that the Kurds should have a degree of self-determination and equal rights. How that unfolds in real life is hard to tell but I don't think that the 30-38 million Kurds would not pursue those things like all other ethnic groups across the world are doing.
There have been 100's of countries that have been newly founded which did not exist before. Including Pakistan and we are both writing on a Pakistani forum right now.