AZADPAKISTAN2009
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 37,669
- Reaction score
- 68
- Country
- Location
Kiya Bajwa Gaddar-e-Azam Hai?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he wasnt even a good soldier, and his commanding officer in burma reprimanded him for tactical timidity. he wasnt supposed to be C-in-C, another major general was, who miraculously died. in what way you ask? a plane crash. we have too many of those in our history. the blame also rests with timid politicians of the 1950s who granted him extension after extension when his tenure as C-in-C was over in 1954.It was Ayub loro who pave the path for Military dictatorships and destroyed the future of Pakistan...
Didn't know that...he wasnt even a good soldier, and his commanding officer in burma reprimanded him for tactical timidity. he wasnt supposed to be C-in-C, another major general was, who miraculously died. in what way you ask? a plane crash. we have too many of those in our history. the blame also rests with timid politicians of the 1950s who granted him extension after extension when his tenure as C-in-C was over in 1954.
Cause even our politicians want to be dictatorshe wasnt even a good soldier, and his commanding officer in burma reprimanded him for tactical timidity. he wasnt supposed to be C-in-C, another major general was, who miraculously died. in what way you ask? a plane crash. we have too many of those in our history. the blame also rests with timid politicians of the 1950s who granted him extension after extension when his tenure as C-in-C was over in 1954.
except that post liaquat ali khan, it was malik ghulam muhammad who was calling the shots and not elected representatives. and then iskander mirza.Cause even our politicians want to be dictators
That whole 50s political elites had no vote bank in west Pakistan so they had to rely on millitary to stay in power instead of relying on true democracy as far as WP is considered
- KPK pro ANP Congress allies
- Punjab - unionist stronghold which only turned pro- ML in the 46 election
- Sindh - only pro-ML province outside of bangali who LAK alienated by dissolving the assembly, replacing the CM
When civillians themselves are not democratic in nature - how the hell would they help establish democracy in Pakistan
WP wasnt the majority. true democracy meant no WP govt.That whole 50s political elites had no vote bank in west Pakistan so they had to rely on millitary to stay in power instead of relying on true democracy as far as WP is considered
Only one question. Why was he not a "ghaddar-e-azam" when PML/NS were sent packing home? Why is this question being asked now?Kiya Bajwa Gaddar-e-Azam Hai?