Khalistan?

[illusion8]

the first one was war not insurgency but battle..every pakistani tried to play role in that.
2nd one was a rebel group which mught have been supported by paskitan after their stand.. we didn't create them to revolt...it was self rising movment.. S.Swami still support that person...

FYI, indian started proxies fromm 55 nwards for independent balchistan and pakhtunstan .. then in in svoiet era they firs time made BLA... then again under US umbrella... india supported Muktis, They supported Tamil tigers...
BTW Haliry also admitted creating Taliban and AL qaeda....


realising now....

Dude..you seem to be a sane person...different to the few other rabid fellow countrymen of yours, India hasn't denied it's involvement in LTTE or the liberation of Bangladesh.

But you really need to research what kind of groups and proxies your establishment has and does support - splinter groups of which have become your enemies and are attacking their masters, as for your plan - I would love to see it take shape.

 

[Sinnerman108]

I will donate money, weapons or logistics for this cause.

East Punjab and Haryana need unite and be together one more time.

 

[Sipahi]

though he posted out of topic... but india was in outskirts of Lahore, so willful "retreat" requires capturing at first place..


For any modern state, it is necessary to work with all members of society. Sikhs claims that during ranjeet singhs time there were many non sikh people at dominating posts and sufi saints were called to laid the foundation of their holy shrines etc... however, these are post-approval Qs and 99% cannot be replaced w.o thr will.

the purpose of my post was just to get what other people think about it...

you are suggesting to create another Kashmir in the heart of Punjab, where 99% muslims lives under the rule of Hindu or Sikh Leader .....

Sikhs are asking for Land and they are constantly asking for Indian land. so let the issue remain in India as in Pakistani Punjab there are only 50000+ sikhs out of 90 million population.

 

[Albatross]

Congratulation our Sikh bros

 

[AnnoyingOrange]

Hi all

I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

Its just bcz Sikh is a separate nation and with Huge numbers but with no 'national' identity. However, Sikhs's dreamland home include both pujab, haryana and jammu.. which will abstain us, mainly, any opportunity to give them a thought/seed of separate homeland...

Your thoughts..
(editing bcz I have over estimated that all members would know about small and enclave semi independent states all over the world) Pakistan will given nothing to anybody. Its just like giving Pakistani sikhs to control their Holy land of Nankana more according to their beliefs. (considering muslims live their too).. Have you forgotten State of Bhawalpur, which formally entered in Pakistan in 56 i think...so a solution like that

Ah...Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha... Ha...Ha...Ha...Ha...

 

[Srinivas]

Hi all

I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

Its just bcz Sikh is a separate nation and with Huge numbers but with no 'national' identity. However, Sikhs's dreamland home include both pujab, haryana and jammu.. which will abstain us, mainly, any opportunity to give them a thought/seed of separate homeland...

Your thoughts..
(editing bcz I have over estimated that all members would know about small and enclave semi independent states all over the world) Pakistan will given nothing to anybody. Its just like giving Pakistani sikhs to control their Holy land of Nankana more according to their beliefs. (considering muslims live their too).. Have you forgotten State of Bhawalpur, which formally entered in Pakistan in 56 i think...so a solution like that

You go into the shoes of C.Asian turks and want to rule Mughal empire ..... why give them a city like Vatican?

Give them their Ranjith Singh's Punjab on the other side, India will give their part in our side ..... Deal ?

 

[CIS-TRANS]

Hi all

I was thinking is it possible to allow a semi independent small state of Khalustan, in Pakistan. Examples are Vetican city or Monaco.

Its just bcz Sikh is a separate nation and with Huge numbers but with no 'national' identity. However, Sikhs's dreamland home include both pujab, haryana and jammu.. which will abstain us, mainly, any opportunity to give them a thought/seed of separate homeland...

Your thoughts..
(editing bcz I have over estimated that all members would know about small and enclave semi independent states all over the world) Pakistan will given nothing to anybody. Its just like giving Pakistani sikhs to control their Holy land of Nankana more according to their beliefs. (considering muslims live their too).. Have you forgotten State of Bhawalpur, which formally entered in Pakistan in 56 i think...so a solution like that

This idea will not meet their demand, Their demand will remain same "Indian Punjab, Haryana, Himachal and jammu" . and such idea will bring instability in Pakistan. We better help Khalistan to create their own army that can start an effective insurgency, Insurgency+diplomatic support is enough to put massive pressure on india to liberate Khalistan and kashmir.

 

[Zhukov]

But their is no Sikh population in Lahore. Its 99% all muslims

You go into the shoes of C.Asian turks and want to rule Mughal empire ..... why give them a city like Vatican?

Give them their Ranjith Singh's Punjab on the other side, India will give their part in our side ..... Deal ?

Its about the will of the people not history crap. People living in Lahore, Sialkot, Gujranwala, Faisalabad etc all of the West punjab are muslims not sikhs. their is no sikh population here and never in the history of Paksitan have they demanded any such state.
Story of the other side of Punjab in East is a totally different tale. People there ARE sikhs and they WANT(or some of them or whatever) khalistan or a seperate state of sorts.Harianvi people dont want to be in khalistan. they are alos punjabis. Its sikh issue not punjab.
What do you expect move all of the population of Lahore out of lahore first? Well done
Then by same logic move all India loving population out of delhi and make it a muslim capital again?
Common man

 

[babbar]

If its not chini papa then its some khalistani terrorist who will do paks dirty work for them.

Well think again. Nobody is going to do the dirty work of a failed violence ridden delisional state with multiple power centers. Yes they will use you though for their dirty work and you will forever remain in this cycle of "brilliant ideas".

 

[Srinivas]

But their is no Sikh population in Lahore. Its 99% all muslims


Its about the will of the people not history crap. People living in Lahore, Sialkot, Gujranwala, Faisalabad etc all of the West punjab are muslims not sikhs. their is no sikh population here and never in the history of Paksitan have they demanded any such state.
Story of the other side of Punjab in East is a totally different tale. People there ARE sikhs and they WANT(or some of them or whatever) khalistan or a seperate state of sorts.Harianvi people dont want to be in khalistan. they are alos punjabis. Its sikh issue not punjab.
What do you expect move all of the population of Lahore out of lahore first? Well done
Then by same logic move all India loving population out of delhi and make it a muslim capital again?
Common man

Delhi is IndraPrastha , I think they need to change the name of City.

Muslims never founded any significant cities they only occupied and demolished them. The logic is flawed.

Invaders has no right to claim any land in Bharat.

The same logic applies to Ranjith singh Punjab. Invaders are foreigners, can go and meet their ancestors in their lands. Ummah is a nation which was extended by invaders, Caliphate (Ummah) has no right to claim Bharat.

It has been a long time since this nonsense is being tolerated !

 

[Zhukov]

Delhi is IndraPrastha , I think they need to change the name of City.

Muslims never founded any significant cities they only occupied and demolished them. The logic is flawed.

Invaders has no right to claim any land in Bharat.

The same logic applies to Ranjith singh Punjab. Invaders are foreigners, can go and meet their ancestors in their lands. Ummah is a nation which was extended by invaders, Caliphate (Ummah) has no right to claim Bharat.

It has been a long time since this nonsense is being tolerated !

And a totally irrelevant response.
I thought i was arguing with a sane mind.
Read my comment again then come up with a proper response if you can understand the topic and what i was saying.
If not then dont bother to tag me in any of your comment again