Key Naxal leader accused of killing 76 CRPF men in Dantewada in 2010 arrested

[saurav]

Great... Now ensure that a lengthy trial begins and Policemen have daily "gup-shup" with him...

 

[Sulman Badshah]

death penalty should be given

 

[Sahasranama]

India is a SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.

EVERY political party in India has to declare itself as "socialist" if they want to contest election. The constitution demands it.

Funny to find people fighting if India should be socialist or not ...... reality is we do not have a choice in this matter unless you change the Constitution of India.

So you see, BJP, Congress, MIM, CPM etc are ALL Socialist parties. LOL.

 

[axisofevil]

Well, we can all be clear one thing. West bengal gov't has been instrumental in helping all these terror and anti national groups gain strength, training, logisitics set up, safe sanctuary, etc over there.

 

[shashikant]

failed, is it??

1. The Libya I Once Knew











and that libya was from 1979... how was india then??

2. Libya’s “Water Wars” and Gaddafi`s Great Man-Made River Project | Global Research

failed, is it?? if that is what failure is, then all of humanity should have that failure... and more, to the extreme...



no true socialist worships anything other than nature and human freedoms/rights/progress... socialism is true spirituality... it is personal and it is societal.

Andher nagri Chaupat raja;takeh ser
bhaji ,takeh ser khaja".

 

[PunjabLion]

i feel bad for him
he is a pakistani hero

 

[Koovie]

failed, is it??

1. The Libya I Once Knew











and that libya was from 1979... how was india then??

2. Libya’s “Water Wars” and Gaddafi`s Great Man-Made River Project | Global Research

failed, is it?? if that is what failure is, then all of humanity should have that failure... and more, to the extreme...



no true socialist worships anything other than nature and human freedoms/rights/progress... socialism is true spirituality... it is personal and it is societal.

Seriously what is that supposed to prove?!

India in in 1979 was pretty much under socialist influence. The reason for our economic rise was the opening of our markets to the rest of the world, thus, ending an era of semi socialism imposed by the Congress..... and by the way, can you name me ONE communist country that succeeded in the end?

Can you tell me one communist country that got even close (in terms of development) to the countries that embraced free markets? Libya`s people were nowhere near to the people of free market economies in terms of living standards, health, education etc etc etc..... and look what happened to Gadaffi two years ago Look at what happened to the entire country!

And please enlighten me, how are maoists "humane" ??? By setting farmers in flames who oppose them? By destroying schools and hospitals? By derailing entire fukcing TRAINS!? By spitting on the principle of rule of law? By being against development? By behaving like freaking animals who plant bombs into the corpses of dead people?!

 

[jamahir]

and look what happened to Gadaffi two years ago Look at what happened to the entire country!

yes... what happened to gaddafi and the libyan jamahiriya was the invasion of 35+ militaries of nato ( and allies, including indian navy )... along with 70,000+ puppets like taliban/ikhwaan/jemah/qaeda... and the slaughter of 200,000+ libyans...

i can't post the cuttings, burnings, beheadings, lynchings, electrocutings, disembowelings, pokings, rapings that nato militaries and puppets did in libya.

you may laugh to that, if you wish...

India in in 1979 was pretty much under socialist influence.

nonsense... not for a second was indian establishment under socialist influence... india took weapons from soviet union because of lower price or even zero price... not for a second did the bombay stock exchange close down since establishment in 1875... yes, 1875... and not for a second did any nationalized bank or private since stop taking interest on loans... and indian military participated in the korea war on the american military side... on the so-called "united nations" side... on the opposite side, supporting north korea, were the soviet union and people's republic of china, all three socialist nations... four million north koreans were killed by the "united nations" side ( indian side )... i have had discussion with indrani about this... you may consult with her.

yes, the factories in india and public organizations ( like banks ) had the "employees union" system which was certainly influence of socialism but that was not government work... union system was because of socialist movements in india and because of world labor laws...

i myself tried to create a union in my former media company... it would have been the first employees union in a modern indian company... but i left the company for certain reasons.

Seriously what is that supposed to prove?

and by the way, can you name me ONE communist country that succeeded in the end?

Can you tell me one communist country that got even close (in terms of development) to the countries that embraced free markets?

libyan jamahiriya was one of the most comfortable and just societies in the world... from 1969 to 2011... i showed you before how... so was syria... below is post by "syrian lion" which i have saved... gives you a hint to why syrians fight to retain their socialist system... i celebrate this post...

below is a famous vid from 2011... you can see the lady's fanaticism for the libyan jamahiriya... i don't know if she is alive...

The reason for our economic rise was the opening of our markets to the rest of the world

india until 1994 or so, was an aid economy... getting financial and infrastructure aid from big nations like usa to little ones like japan and switzerland... and then came the info. tech. industry which was built on coolie-work... unnecessary projects from the west giving unnecessary contracts to unimaginative engineers in bangalore... money came in big amounts... and then the western capitalist economies collapsed beginning 2007... western companies began saving themselves by removing unnecessary projects and unnecessary people... which meant no projects to indian companies... things like banglore ibm office removing tens of thousands with five days... that was the indian bubble burst... cascading to job losses in other sectors... ensuring that kingfisher airlines remained closed, because of no passengers filling the seats because of those passengers not having money... and of course, closure of mba colleges and entire departments in other colleges... and bringing india back to aid economy... charity... loans from communist china... promise of loan from collapsing japan...

what i wrote above can never be taught in mba colleges... you should burn your college degree and resign from your job to be able to write such a thing.

By behaving like freaking animals who plant bombs into the corpses of dead people?!

in the early 90's i would read of how andhra police tortured members of the "people's war group" ( which later merged with other groups to form the cpi-maoist... mao-ists or naxalites )... what if you were tortured like that??

please do read of naxalbari and why the naxalite movement started... and please do read arundhati roy's book "walking with the comrades" about her visit to some naxalites.

lastly, someone asked me about lack of development in communist west bengal... hint i suppose, to present non-government position of communists in bengal and kerala.

there are reasons for non-development in west bengal... one being the lack of international co-operation between indian public communist parties and successful socialist nations ( which was everyone else )... and that non-cooperation was result of the reason for the decades-old split in indian communist movement which was one party 1921 onwards.

presently, the cpi-m and cpi-ml are talking about re-unification... i leave it to them if they want to join up with the naxalites and take the fight to the cites...

 

[Koovie]

yes... what happened to gaddafi and the libyan jamahiriya was the invasion of 35+ militaries of nato ( and allies, including indian navy )... along with 70,000+ puppets like taliban/ikhwaan/jemah/qaeda... and the slaughter of 200,000+ libyans...

i can't post the cuttings, burnings, beheadings, lynchings, electrocutings, disembowelings, pokings, rapings that nato militaries and puppets did in libya.

No, Gaddaffi was a dictator who eventually got ousted by the people of Libya. NATO military forces did not do whatever you are talking about. .... in fact you cannot even back it up.

And if the communism is humanism, why did the regime there commit the human rights violations it did?
If communism was so successful there, why were Libya`s indicators for economic success, living standards etc far below any free market nation?

Libya`s economy almost completely depended on its oil exports.... there was no innovation, no other meaningful industries... and everything thanks to communism.

nonsense... not for a second was indian establishment under socialist influence... india took weapons from soviet union because of lower price or even zero price... not for a second did the bombay stock exchange close down since establishment in 1875... yes, 1875... and not for a second did any nationalized bank or private since stop taking interest on loans... and indian military participated in the korea war on the american military side... on the so-called "united nations" side... on the opposite side, supporting north korea, were the soviet union and people's republic of china, all three socialist nations... four million north koreans were killed by the "united nations" side ( indian side )... i have had discussion with indrani about this... you may consult with her.

India did very well suffer from socialist policies during that period. Nehru himself was pretty much a socialist (not a full one though)

libyan jamahiriya was one of the most comfortable and just societies in the world... from 1969 to 2011...

Laughable statement ...... unless you have statistics which can prove it.

The fact remains, communist countries are simply far behind free market economies.

 

[jamahir]

No, Gaddaffi was a dictator who eventually got ousted by the people of Libya. NATO military forces did not do whatever you are talking about. .... in fact you cannot even back it up.

is that a joke??

the british makers of the "typhoon" jet fighter were showing gun-cam videos to indian air force officers in 2011 to induce india to buy typhoons for the mmrca or whatever contract... and those gun-cam vids showed typhoons bombarding libyan position, particularly muammar gaddafi's compound in tripoli... the bab-al-aziziya.

s.m.krishna was meeting nato leaders all through 2011 in "friends of libya" meetings.

the only "libyan people" interested in murdering muammar gaddafi were the qaeda/lifg criminals like abdul hakim belhaj.

but i don't suppose you had even heard of libya before 2011... you just believe what bbc or zee news tells you... "gaddafi and assad are killing civilians, including women and children"...

below are the real people of libya in 2011... libyan jamahiriya... look at the flag they hold... "green flag"... you follow the member "i-lek"... ask him what he mean when he said "green libya lives"...

and you didn't acknowledge the lady from that vid... she was fanatic in her support for muammar gaddafi... and she is not what western mainstream media presents to you...

And if the communism is humanism, why did the regime there commit the human rights violations it did?

western bloc propaganda... and their 40 year old conspiracy...

Libya`s economy almost completely depended on its oil exports.... there was no innovation, no other meaningful industries... and everything thanks to communism.

doesn't matter that libyan income depended on oil... libya internally spent it all on the comfort and welfare of its citizens... unlike many other societies ( like india ) where national income ( esp. from stupid income tax ) is used by the government to buy weapons to kill humans of other nations.

libya gave the "green book" to the world... what innovation did india give humanity since 1947?? don't say "services" from software coolies...

India did very well suffer from socialist policies during that period. Nehru himself was pretty much a socialist (not a full one though)

i am socialist... stop saying that...

unless you have statistics which can prove it.

mathematics is not my game... but read that mathaba article again ( the libya i once knew )... and do your own research.

 

[sathya]

Now he ll loose everything in his life before his life itself is gone..