Kerala Minister compares cross demolition to babri

[TISSOT]

if it was some property of muslims, the govt secretariat would have been bombed right now and fascist cm's hand would have been chopped,.

Its a COMMUNIST CM so its unlikely his hands would be chopped. Those trying would have their heads chopped.

This is state of Kerala economics. Better you ask him to stop kerala from going bankrupt.

 

[Tshering22]

https://twitter.com/x/status/857865584217923584

This blast is not by muslims, its by christians.

https://twitter.com/x/status/847007893127815168

Christian religious terrorism is common in Northeast against non-christians. Mostly these are funded by churches in the US Bible Belt and certain European countries.

 

[Diggy]

Shameful act , and just goes to show you the massive problem India has its a ticking communal time bomb

churches are getting bombed left right & center in peaceful country pakistan , certainly a ticking time bomb

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/23/pakistan-church-bombings-christian-minority
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/27/asia/pakistan-lahore-deadly-blast/

on topic - usual dramebazi by these evangelists , even our hyperactive media has now stopped taking their rona dhona seriously , first illegally put a cross and start whining when the government clears the property .

 

[TISSOT]

Christian religious terrorism is common in Northeast against non-christians. Mostly these are funded by churches in the US Bible Belt and certain European countries.

After abusing Hindus and Hinduism for having caste, the same Shameless guys are now demanding reservations for Dalit Christians and muslims

http://www.anglicannews.org/news/2016/08/equality-demanded-for-dalit-christians-and-muslims.aspx

Equality demanded for Dalit Christians and Muslims





Picture is of Anthony Lianzuala takes over as the new Controller General of Accounts.

Blatant display of Religious symbol in Government Office.

How is this legal in "secular" India ?

 

[Holmes]

Christian religious terrorism is common in Northeast against non-christians. Mostly these are funded by churches in the US Bible Belt and certain European countries.

Not in the level of what muslims are doing across the world.

 

[salarsikander]

Not in the level of what muslims are doing across the world.

No one can match US in invading a sovereign country for fake WMDs and then ibvin birth to hatred

 

[maximuswarrior]

Typical Abrahamic expansionism.

Organised religion should have stayed in Middle East so that other civilisations and agnostics could live peacefully.



Numerous temples and roadside shrines are also demolished.

Religion is the easiest way to grab land here.

The government here knows this excuse and simply demolishes any religious illegal structure.

Christianity is no less a culprit in it as much as anything else.

The irony here is that you name Abrahamic expansionism, yet in your own country Muslims and other minorities are getting threats to convert to Hinduism. Dalits aren't allowed to leave Hinduism. Some people are killed who have converted from Hinduism to other religions. We can also put many labels on Hinduism.

Religion doesn't teach expansionism. Religion doesn't teach force. Humans who abuse religion for political gain seek expansionism. Make that distinction.

 

[footmarks]

The irony here is that you name Abrahamic expansionism, yet in your own country Muslims, Dalits and other minorities are getting threats to convert to Hinduism. People are killed who have converted from Hinduism to other religions. We can also put many labels on Hinduism.

Religion doesn't teach expansionism. Religion doesn't teach force. Humans who abuse religion for political gain seek expansionism. Make that distinction.

Religion does teach expansionism and respond aggresively when exposed to such expansionism from any other religion. All religions do that, have done that, or are doing that, some religions more than others. Expansion of christianity caused clashes with judaism, expansion of islam caused clashes with Christianity. even though all these 3 religions are very very similar, they clashed, caused bloodshed and expanded through money, power and force.

Religion is different from faith. Religion is organised, faith is personal. One should prey to god, and dont bother oneself about what the other person believes in.

 

[Tshering22]

The irony here is that you name Abrahamic expansionism, yet in your own country Muslims and other minorities are getting threats to convert to Hinduism. Dalits aren't allowed to leave Hinduism. Some people are killed who have converted from Hinduism to other religions. We can also put many labels on Hinduism.

Religion doesn't teach expansionism. Religion doesn't teach force. Humans who abuse religion for political gain seek expansionism. Make that distinction.

I don't know where you get such news.

Our faiths aren't organised religions and there are no rules. People here use conversion as an instrument to receive financial benefits and freebies from Church and Dawah money.

Don't you think it is a bit rich coming from you, where you actually have blasphemy and apostasy laws?

Not in the level of what muslims are doing across the world.

I agree.

But it is done under the radar. Not appreciated. Here, religion is often confused with culture/faith and people take it seriously and literally.

We don't appreciate Abrahamic expansionism en masse - be it through deceit or violence.

By we, I mean Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs and Jains. We don't compel or tempt people to mass convert and we don't expect the same to our communities as well.

After abusing Hindus and Hinduism for having caste, the same Shameless guys are now demanding reservations for Dalit Christians and muslims

http://www.anglicannews.org/news/2016/08/equality-demanded-for-dalit-christians-and-muslims.aspx

Equality demanded for Dalit Christians and Muslims





Picture is of Anthony Lianzuala takes over as the new Controller General of Accounts.

Blatant display of Religious symbol in Government Office.

How is this legal in "secular" India ?

My question exactly.

If Abrahamic religions claim to remove much-touted discrimination, then why do castes and factions have distinct identities even after conversion?

After conversion, all benefits should be revoked and nullified.