What's new

Keep the India pot boiling

Did'nt the IA conduct a cross border raid on 6th April which resulted in the death of one of their soldiers????? Isnt that a provocation? This fact destroys the credibility of this article.

Provocation, absence of provocation. I can care less about any brutality from either side. They are nemesis, we kill them and they kill us. Dead is dead arguments on the rules pertaining to the conduct of war and conflicts notwithstanding. Having said that it is our prerogative to promote our narrative as and when we want to. We do not take pointers from pompous schmucks like you.
 
Provocation, absence of provocation. I can care less about any brutality from either side. They are nemesis, we kill them and they kill us. Dead is dead arguments on the rules pertaining to the conduct of war and conflicts notwithstanding. Having said that it is our prerogative to promote our narrative as and when we want to. We do not take pointers from pompous schmucks like you.

Good for you. If you don't want to listen to reason why even bother to reply.
 
Good for you. If you don't want to listen to reason why even bother to reply.

You're rather presumptuous. Your posts need to be reasonable for one to try and glean any reason out of them in the first place, perhaps the concept of causality escapes you among other things.
 
You're rather presumptuous. Your posts need to be reasonable for one to try and glean any reason out of them in the first place, perhaps the concept of causality escapes you among other things.

OK, the article states PA wants to keep the Indian pot boiling and hence carried out the cross border alleged beheadings. And I said the reason for that incident was the IA's provocation 2 days earlier, hence the article does'nt make sense.
 
OK, the article states PA wants to keep the Indian pot boiling and hence carried out the cross border alleged beheadings. And I said the reason for that incident was the IA's provocation 2 days earlier, hence the article does'nt make sense.

You are perhaps negligent of the fact that the IA has denied any such incursion just as much as the PA has done the same. So in short you are disregarding the IA's official statement on this incident- and are endorsing the PA's ISPR version by stating that in your opinion no mutilation occurred. Subtlety as a false flagger is not strong suite. Ah, but the competition is so meager and absent even an iota of intellect these days. One could weep tears of blood.
 
OK, the article states PA wants to keep the Indian pot boiling and hence carried out the cross border alleged beheadings. And I said the reason for that incident was the IA's provocation 2 days earlier, hence the article does'nt make sense.

Gauging from the stance that you have adopted, across various threads, which more often than not is in consonance with a hawkish position that one expects from some of the self-appointed authorities on geo-political issues in PDF, it is extremely difficult to believe that you are an Indian residing in India.

However, some have narrowed down your IP address to Hyderabad.

So, really, what's your story?
 
You are perhaps negligent of the fact that the IA has denied any such incursion just as much as the PA has done the same. So in short you are disregarding the IA's official statement on this incident- and are endorsing the PA's ISPR version by stating that in your opinion no mutilation occurred. Subtlety as a false flagger is not strong suite. Ah, but the competition is so meager and absent even an iota of intellect these days. One could weep tears of blood.

Finally, on January 6, matters came to a head. Following a low-grade exchange of fire that night, 19 Infantry Division commander Gulab Singh Rawat sought and obtained permission for aggressive action against the Pakistani position from where his troops were being targeted.

Pakistan insists its post, Sawan Patra, was raided by Indian troops. India has denied the allegation. “None of our troops crossed the Line of Control,” said Jagdish Dahiya, an Indian army spokesperson.

Either way, though, a Pakistani soldier was dead before the shooting ended — and another critically injured.

“Let’s just put it this way,” a senior government official in New Delhi said, “there was no formal permission to stage a cross-border raid to target Sawan Patra. However, in the heat of fighting, these things have been known to happen. Pakistan has done this, and our forces have done this, ever since fighting began in Jammu and Kashmir in 1990.”


http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/runaway-grandmother-sparked-savage-skirmish-on-loc/article4291426.ece
 
There were conflicting statements from various officials. If you go through a Reuters report a day after the incident an army spokesman denied multiliation. And why did we not permit an independent enquiry into this alleged mutiliation. Everything seems fishy. It's not as if IA has not lied before.

can you share those so called official releases

he was the reply by the indian general to people like you

Indian Army Chief answer to Pakistan Journalist. - YouTube
 
Only hindustanis can come up with as brilliant a war "doctrine" as mutilating dead soldiers :hitwall: :hitwall: :hitwall:

former senior officer in the Indian Cabinet Secretariat, needs a knee in his groin to bring him back to his senses, that is if he ever had any


CHANGE IN DOCTRINE

Was it to underscore the importance of the “India front” in the scheme of things outlined by a “new doctrine” developed by the Pakistan military? Reports quoting Pakistan security analysts said that the change in doctrine was a “paradigm shift”.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom