sancho
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,011
- Reaction score
- 27
- Country
- Location
But 95 kN would still be less than 105+ kN which the GEF414 generates hence its better to leave kaveri to power a twin engine aircraft..... where two smaller engines could do the job...... unlike tejas MK2 which would house a bigger GEF414...... remember M-88 on rafale smoke out only 75 kN in wet thrust however it is abou 100kgs lighter than kaveri..... perhaps.
The GE 414 engine in the F18SH 98kN AB thrust, the same engine in the single engine Gripen NG produces 96kN AB thrust and the LCA MK2 engine will be similar to these versions. The EPE engine upgrade could offer 117kN but needs dedicated funding and further developments, which IAF didn't even accepted for the F18SH in MMRCA, let alone for LCA MK2, so that is out of question and don't forget to put the thrust into relation to the weight!
One of Kaveris biggest problems was reportedly the overweight and not only the lack of thrust, because that results in a lower TWR than needed. Some reports stated it to weight more than 1100Kg, which would be comparable to the GE engine, but with far lower thrust. Compared to the M88 on the other side, the Kaveri might offer similar thrust (depending on source), but at a higher weight, because the French engine weighs less than 900Kg only! So the co-development with the French could not only help us to increase the thrust of Kaveri, but also to get more control of the weight problems of the engine, just like we chose EADS as a consultant to counter LCAs general weight issues.
Oh btw, one point we should keep in mind as well is, that these fighters normaly don't fly with afterburner turned on all the time, which means that the thrust difference between an GE 414 and M88-2 in AB thrust might be 23kN, but in dry thrust (or normal flight) only around 12kN!