What's new

Kashmiris concerned by plans for Hindu satellite cities

This is pure and unadulterated rubbish. Neither you nor the government of India has or had any jurisdiction over the land handed over. It was always a piece of cartographic aggression by the Ministry of External Affairs against the Chinese. No maps existed covering this piece of territory, and maps were hastily made up on Nehru's explicit instructions. Our earliest maps did not include this territory as part of India.

So where is the question of believing Pakistan? It is a question of whether anyone at all can believe India.

Second, neither Pakistan nor China changed demographics in any single way by the recognition of the Shaksgam strip as belonging to China. It was uninhabited land. So how does this have anything to do with demographics?

Thirdly, you have never quoted any proof that there has been demographic change in Gilgit. Your only argument is that if they can support it in Indian administered Kashmir, it is obvious that it is being done in Azad Kashmir. The defect with this is that in Indian administered Kashmir, Hindus, citizens of Kashmir as defined by the Kashmir constitution, were driven out; in Azad Kashmir, there are no Hindus to be driven out, and the people re-settled in Gilgit were Sunni Kashmiris, who have always been recognised as citizens of Kashmir under the Kashmir constitution.

You have no case.

You never had a case.

And stop hinting that those who do not agree with your stupid arguments are acting against India.

If you have problems related to believe in India , you can do what is needful for you.

I was expecting this stupid argument of no demography change is possible in Azad Kashmir since there are no Hindu. Shia-Sunni violence, Punjabi dominance in Kashmir and migration of non Kashmiris for marriage purposes, Pakthun tribes in Gilgit, yeh sab kya hai?
 
. . . .
If you have problems related to believe in India , you can do what is needful for you.

I was expecting this stupid argument of no demography change is possible in Azad Kashmir since there are no Hindu. Shia-Sunni violence, Punjabi dominance in Kashmir and migration of non Kashmiris for marriage purposes, Pakthun tribes in Gilgit, yeh sab kya hai?

Yeh sab kya hai?

Ignorance.
  1. The people of Baltistan are Shia; the people of Kashmir are Sunni. So much for Shia-Sunni violence.
  2. Punjabi dominance in Kashmir: all the members of the Northern Light Infantry are locals. In the rest of the Pakistan Army, ratios are quite different.
  3. Migration of non-Kashmiris for marriage purposes: where did you get that? In the marriage ads of the Times of India, Muzaffarnagar?
  4. Gilgit was linked to Pakhtuns from time immemorial, you ignoramus.


Wrong agency. :-D
 
.
Yeh sab kya hai?

Ignorance.
  1. The people of Baltistan are Shia; the people of Kashmir are Sunni. So much for Shia-Sunni violence.
  2. Punjabi dominance in Kashmir: all the members of the Northern Light Infantry are locals. In the rest of the Pakistan Army, ratios are quite different.
  3. Migration of non-Kashmiris for marriage purposes: where did you get that? In the marriage ads of the Times of India, Muzaffarnagar?
  4. Gilgit was linked to Pakhtuns from time immemorial, you ignoramus.
you are in India thats why you are not aware. I can understand. Whats happening is hidden from your guys. But Indian government is quite aware of such things
 
.
oh good. what is he doing on PDF. lol

Keeping an eye on Indian morons who have no evidence but ask questioners to ask RAW for evidence.

you are in India thats why you are not aware. I can understand. Whats happening is hidden from your guys. But Indian government is quite aware of such things

Don't exhibit your ignorance with such determination. Just saying that you are a fool and were mistaken will be enough. Don't pull the Indian government into your failures; they have enough other problems to worry about.

How come what is hidden from us guys is clear as daylight in Germany?
 
.
Keeping an eye on Indian morons who have no evidence but ask questioners to ask RAW for evidence.

yeah, ask them they will furnish. according to you RAW and Military should stop working too for the interest of country.
 
. . .
yeah, ask them they will furnish. according to you RAW and Military should stop working too for the interest of country.

No.

According to me, RAW and the Indian military shouldn't be pulled into a discussion when the loser doesn't know what to say next.

Neither RAW nor the military will present classified information.

figure it out yourself. lol

You mean lol is cypher? Because every time you are asked something that you can't answer, you say lol.
 
. . . .
In Gilgit, it has already changed chacha.When they supported demography change in India, it is obvious in Azad Kashmir it is being done.''

It does not look so obvious,actually. In Gilgit Baltistan, the state subject law was abolished in 70's by Bhutto. If they wanted to do the same in AJK, the state subject law,for technical reasons had to be removed first from it's 1974 constitution.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom