Screambowl
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2010
- Messages
- 8,167
- Reaction score
- -39
- Country
- Location
No, it does not. You cannot buy land in conflict, but it has nothing to do with Article 370. Article 370 says that you cannot change J&K laws without the J&K assembly. Not even the Chief Minister and the Cabinet of J&K can do this.
The article does not require permission from the state government to buy land in Kashmir.
It does require all decisions outside defence and communications to be decisions made by the J&K assembly. That's all it does.
The autonomy given by Article 370 nowhere mentions ownership of land. It mentions legislation outside three restricted subjects. Such legislation in J&K includes ownership of land. That is the only way this article is relevant here.
There is no similar kind of article in the Pakistani constitution and that is irrelevant, because neither of these would govern ownership of land anyway.
I do not justify the Pakistani constitution. However, I do justify facts. You should get hold of the facts. It is a useful thing to do.
You should also learn to read books.
That normally comes before dealing with Pakistan, not after.
And they have whispered this into your little pearly pink ears, no doubt. What a 420 you are.
RAW does changes in demography? Ask some Martian on PDF. It doesn't.
What are you talking about? How is Shia-Sunni an example of change in sect?
Why not let them have an opinion? How does it affect the situation on the ground?
No doubt.
Have you been reading books in secret?
You have been reading books in secret.
How wonderful to know that you have caught up with the rest of the world.
Ah, no, I am not much aware of psychological warfare. Not to the extent of an expert like you.
I like your approach of using common sense rather than facts.
Common sense tells me that you are a Martian.
1) I did not say article prohibits it, I said this article gives power to make laws in the state to prohibit the migration. Dhyan se samjha karo baat warna hindi seekho. I'll explain you in Hindi.
2) Obviously they are pro Pakistani, yes they whispered. Now what? Got any new tactic to support them? Lols
3) Because Indian government know sabout the demographic change, which is itself responsible for the partition of India, we cannot ask any one now.
4) Inspired from Kashmir, if your brothers ask for Islamistan, the all majority should bow and give them a new country.
don't talk nonsense.
There is no sectarian violence in Azad Kashmir as the people there are all Sunnis, also Gilgit is all Shia but there have been no reports of attacks in gilgit based on sectarian lines, the last attack I heard of was on those tourists in the mountains.
As for the law prohibiting settlement I am not sure I will have to look for it but I know settlements are banned and other Pakistanis can corroborate.
Kindlyquote the law similar to article 370 first, then we can discuss about the settlements.