Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Cry me a river
A quick search on Google reveals that FIR was not filed on time due to Omar's reluctance, this is why the SP was transferred for not filing the FIR on time. The bodies bore marks of scratches and struggle, this alone is reason enough to file the FIR. This pretty much confirms it that he was afraid of his masters in Delhi, thats why he showed reluctance. There is no case to process, after all the stakeholders in this case want to live their lives peacefully or else they risk facing the might off 700 000 men armed to the teeth. Indian special laws pretty much guarantee that Indian soldiers are shielded from any prosecution for the excesses they commit.
You have an opinion and therefore you are trying to fit facts to tailor to your jaundiced view. You suggest that the bodies bore marks of a struggle, opinion elsewhere suggests differently. No proof to support your view as the view being correct. Your references to masters in Delhi reflects the ridiculous position that you start out from, a neutral observer you are not. Your opinion is well, just that, your opinion.
I love this wrapped back handed slap referring to Hafiz Saeed. I wish you would actually apply your advice to your own self. Is there any piece of evidence that Hafiz Saeed is guilty of mass murder. Has India been able to prove this in the Court of Law? Oh wait i forgot, in this case the rule of law goes right out of the window for a citizen of the world's so called largest democracy. I have no love for Hafiz Saeed, but i do believe in the court of law and due process.
Prove in the court of law? which court? Yours? Unless you are blind or intellectually dishonest, there is ample evidence to prove that Hafiz Saeed is guilty of terrorism. Unless, of course, you are one of the chaps still asking for proof against Bin Laden.
Last i read, IOK was a disputed territory and as a muslim my heart goes to any muslim who has been denied justice.
Since you have made it clear that your concern is only for those of your religion, expect no particular interest from us about the premium that we must place on such declarations of support.
The case was too murky. One of the ladies bore marks of sexual assault and scratches. There was no conclusive evidence to support that these ladies were drowned in the river.
If the case was murky, there is no basis for blindly asserting that your view, an admittedly biased one, is the correct one.
You know whats even more sad, the apologists whom try to justify the wrong doings. Its even sadder to watch respected Indian members justify the excesses committed by the Indian forces in Kashmir. I find it disgusting that heinous crimes such as rape or murder are justified, and even in some cases with the consent of senior officers they are covered up.
No one is defending a clear cut case of excess committed. In a self admitted murky case, you can have two opinions and there need be no motives impugned. If I were to do that, I could argue that you are cynically exploiting the death of two women to support your losing cause. Same holds for your defence of an internationally named terrorist. Certificate issuing is both unnecessary & pointess.