Omar1984
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 12,296
- Reaction score
- 0
I think you are confused Asim. Since the topic has been diverted once again to the pet Pakistani peeve, let me also say that it is Pakistan who forcefully occupied part of Indian soil in 1948. I also would like to say that Pakistanis commenting on the morality or otherwise of Indian leaders is really precious
Cheers, Doc
If you mean Azad Kashmir when you are talking about "indian soil" then why has there been no protests in Pakistan's Azad Kashmir against being part Pakistan and in favor of india in these past 62 years.
If anything, Kashmir (including the part India currently occupies) is Pakistani soil and majority of Kashmiris would agree that Kashmir does not belong to india. And dont say because the king of Kashmir (who was hindu) signed Kashmir (a Muslim majority region) to India its part of India, because the king of Junagadh (who was Muslim) also signed Junagadh (a Hindu majority region) to Pakistan but then India sent troops into the region and made Junagadh be part of India.
Lets see what Kashmiris say:
Last edited by a moderator: