Kashmir | News & Discussions.

[mr42O]

6 province is Kashmir so get ready

 

[Evil Flare]

ok

We Agree for Referendum ...

Let the People Decide ..

 

[balbir pasha]

hahaha India express..... go back were u come from lol

This is formal reaction of Minsitry of External Affairs, India and not personal opinion of Indian Express

 

[Skywalker]

The King of Kashmir already decided to be with India. So it is and it would ever be.

keep dreaming.

 

[Materialistic]

Always tell your favorite half of the story, Who the hell was the King !!
A traitor of his own land who took money and disappeared in the dust.

NEway, at that time it was left over to the people that they will decide where to merge with and majority will win, Pure Democracy. So, there is no question of King. Also, united nations had also accepted in 1947 or 48 and accepted that there should be a referendum and by demography kashmir goes to Pakistan, but India din't follow and UN din't bother as they had no personal interest attached to it otherwise India would have been bombed. hahahaa (laughing on UN)

And also it is India who is unlike Pakistan controlling the area by force and has 700,000 armymen their out of 1.13 million against the will of people/In contrast, Pakistan has brought there development, prosperity, Democracy and freedom to people.

Now any wise person can understand whats illegal control of a land.

 

[ice_man]

The King of Kashmir already decided to be with India. So it is and it would ever be.

the nawab of junagadh & hyderabad decided to be with pakistan so should i also say that it is & it would forever be a part of pakistan???

i hate this indian drama that starts of every now & then about cheap bollywood statements by there general kapoor where he thinks he is a hero who can take on china & pakistan & destroy them both simultaneously! this is followed by such outlandish statements about gilgit & baltistan!

i think indians need to relax & ACCEPT PAKISTAN AS A SOVERIGN COUNTRY!

 

[EjazR]

Youths rally in Kashmir for return of Pandits: India Today

For the first time since insurgency began in Jammu and Kashmir, a rally was held on Saturday demanding the return of Kashmiri Pandits to the Valley.

Kashmiri youth having no political background assembled at Pratab Park in Srinagar Lal Chowk, carrying placards that called for the return of the Pandits.

"There is a widespread sentiment among Kashmiri Muslims that Pandits should return. We have decided to give voice to the popular sentiment," said Jehangir Raina, a software engineer.

He said the campaign didn't have links with any political group. "Pain is pain, whether it is of Muslims, Jews or Hindus. We want to show solidarity with the Pandits who have suffered for years," Raina said.

The youths have named their organisation Restructuring Economic Assets and Social Obligations of the Nation, or REASON. The REASON, Raina said, was an advocacy group of young professionals and would take up various causes in public interest.

The group said a 30 minute sit-in would be organised on the first Saturday of each month to show solidarity with the Pandits. The group, however, opposed the demand of a separate homeland for the Pandits.

The state government, too, seems to be gearing up to facilitate the return of the Pandits. On Wednesday, chief minister Omar Abdullah approved the creation of 3,000 posts for unemployed migrants.

 

[ice_man]

You can talk about referendum on Kashmir but not referendum on Baluchistan :p

Interesting how these Pakistanis feel for Kashmir i citizens and yet support all these terrorists who end up killing and terrorizing Kashmir. So much for your freedom fighters

what are you talking about was balochistan ever a disputed territory? and it joined pakistan itself in 1948!

what does your statement mean "Interesting how these Pakistanis feel for Kashmir i citizens and yet support all these terrorists who end up killing and terrorizing Kashmir."

what you learnt this line on NDTV or STAR NEWS?? we are fighting terrorism not supporting it! don't listen to your media! & before you point fingers towards us look at the insurgency of the maoist in the northern states!

stop this dram of india "*************************" man seriously stop indian filmy lines guys! be a bit more Manly

 

[Awesome]

Pakistan is ready for Plebiscite even in Gilgit-Baltistan. India is the only one that is afraid to ask Kashmiris what they want.

 

[New Shivaji]

Pakistan is ready for Plebiscite even in Gilgit-Baltistan. India is the only one that is afraid to ask Kashmiris what they want.

India will conduct plebcisite provided pakistan moves out all its troops from pakistan occupaied Kashmir including gilgit and Baltistan.
I would like to hear when are you guys moving out the troops.

 

[ice_man]

Kashmir joined india in 1947.

Your so called "mujhahidden" kill common kashmiris as well.
You are reaping what you sowed.
7 blasts a week in pakistan, man I think u are wise enough to understand ASAL ME KON KISKA KAR RAHA HAI....

kashmir joined india in 1947 true but my friend like i said junagadh & hyderbad nawab's joined pakistan in 1947 before indian army entered & seized it by force!!!

your army kills common citzens & rapes the women

and as for kon kiski kaar raha hai look man you guys are the ones that keep crying kaay HUMARAI BHARAT MAA KO PAKISTAN BALADKAR KAAR RAHA HAI! so i am saying stop saying it! we never said anything and as for kon kis kii kaar raha hai so you are accepting india is behind the 7 blasts a day???

 

[Windjammer]

India will conduct plebcisite provided pakistan moves out all its troops from pakistan occupaied Kashmir including gilgit and Baltistan.
I would like to hear when are you guys moving out the troops.

Get your facts right first, the Indian part is the occupied Kashmir, the rest is refered to as AZAD KASHMIR.
Ever wondered why there are always demos, strikes, abduction and killing and rapes etc etc taking place on daily basis in the Indian held Kashmir, where as Azad Kashmir is the most peaceful part on this side of the border. ? But i guess it takes high moral values to address this question.

 

[ice_man]

India will conduct plebcisite provided pakistan moves out all its troops from pakistan occupaied Kashmir including gilgit and Baltistan.
I would like to hear when are you guys moving out the troops.

the deal was both sides withdraw their forces! & look don't go around in cricles all your layman questions have been asked & answered on this forum! go read the responses! don't waste the bandwith! search your questions on this forum & you will get a comprhensive debate!

 

[New Shivaji]

the deal was both sides withdraw their forces! & look don't go around in cricles all your layman questions have been asked & answered on this forum! go read the responses! don't waste the bandwith! search your questions on this forum & you will get a comprhensive debate!

Pls. check your UN resolutions , it clearly states pakistani troops to be moved out of Pak occupied kashmir not indian troops.

 

[ice_man]

Pls. check your UN resolutions , it clearly states pakistani troops to be moved out of Pak occupied kashmir not indian troops.

Nonsense, it clearly pointed out in the UNSC resolutions explained how the UNSC resolutions called for tripartite negotiations between India, Pakistan and the UN appointed commission/rapporteur on withdrawal. Subsequent resolutions completely rejected the irrational Indian demand of a complete unilateral Pakistani withdrawal, while India forces would remain in occupation of their share of the territory and possibly occupy the remainder.

In addition, the excuse that 'Pakistan should withdraw first' is just that, an excuse - India agreed to the fact that the dispute would be settled via UN held plebsicite, so what difference does it make whether Pakistan withdraws unilaterally or in conjunction with India? It was and is an excuse to avoid a plebsicite, and the UNSC correctly rejected even more directly it in subsequent resolutions.

The UNSC resolutions are clear on this point, India cannot pick and choose what it likes. Independence was not really an option for the Princely States in the rules of partition was it? So why would it be an option in the UNSC resolutions, that were largely based on the agreement on partition arrived at between the Congress, Muslim League and the British?

& if we are on this nonesense why don't you hand over Junagadh & Hyderabad! the reason why we will not withdraw from kashmir unilaterally is because we saw what india did with hyderabad! india would annex kashmir the same way!

besides AZAAD KASHMIR is not a part of pakistan it has its own government!!!!