Kashmir | News & Discussions.

[Spring Onion]

It is simpler than that. Xinxiang.
Employ demographic assimilation within Kashmir. Let people buy land and settle. However, I doubt that the politicos have the spine'n brain.

Try that and you will be faced with suicide bombs not stones

 

[gurjot]

Try that and you will be faced with suicide bombs not stones

we cant tolerate suicide bombers.

 

[Smileplz]

We should be hard,or else this will only expand,people should be treated in a way that the future generation doesn't follow them.

 

[SONOFAGUN]

Try that and you will be faced with suicide bombs not stones

This is waht China has been doing in Tibet, Paksitan in Paksitan Occupied Kashmir. Like Paksitan, we should do the same and chnage the name of J&K to Free Jammu and Kashmir.

The issue will than get solved in five years.

 

[mohan goyal]

janaji is simply a instigator dont need to reply her

 

[Vinod2070]

Try that and you will be faced with suicide bombs not stones

China is doing fine in Xingxiang with the policy.

 

[eric_cartman]

I think education and employment to the youth is the only way to solve the crisis. You got to remain occupied with some career goal in your mind to keep urself being astray from the violent things in life.

Also I have no idea how come these stupid security forces end up killing kids coming out of mosque while not wounding or arresting the stone pelter?? this is a serious question mark in my mind??

 

[Spring Onion]

China is doing fine in Xingxiang with the policy.

So you endorse Chinese policy ???


Good to hear Indians are atleast agreed to something from China.

And do you think with India handing over Kashmiri land to Indians, will you be able to face the consequences beyond stone pelting

 

[Spring Onion]

We should be hard,or else this will only expand,people should be treated in a way that the future generation doesn't follow them.

What is your definition of hard than the current mode of force used by Indian occupying forces in Kashmiris' country ??

 

[Vinod2070]

So you endorse Chinese policy ???

You do. We have a different approach to the Chinese.

Good to hear Indians are atleast agreed to something from China.

China has many things to teach India, there is no doubt about it.

And do you think with India handing over Kashmiri land to Indians, will you be able to face the consequences beyond stone pelting

You know, there were Pushtun terrorists from Afghanistan coming into Kashmir just after 1989, when USSR had pulled back and Pakistan redeployed some of these terrorists to Kashmir.

They came highly haughty. I remember reading an Indian magazine that they boasted that the Indian army was "bachchon ke sena" (army of kids) and they were Afghans.

Their arse was kicked so bad, they have never been seen again.

If we can kick out those hardened terrorists, these stone pelters are nothing.

 

[parasite]

I think all DESHDROHI should be punished with bullet....tear gas won't do

 

[linkinpark]

Nonsense - India invaded and annexed the State of Junagadh months after the ruler had acceded to Pakistan, and demanded Pakistan reject the accession the entire time. So India has no standing on the basis of 'accession'.

Junagadh was acceded to Pakistan against the wishes of its people who are 80% Hindus. India had to invade according to popular sentiment. On the other hand, in case of Kashmir, Hari Singh acceded neither to India nor Pakistan up until Pakistani tribals and military started invading. Sardar Patel already expressed wishes to Liaqat Ali of leaving Hyderabad to India (again majority Hindu) in exhange for Kashmir to Pakistan. But Liaqat Ali didn't agree and the results are there for everyone to see.

Once again, however, Jinnah failed to explore all the options open to him. One possibility was to make compromises over another Princely State, Hyderabad. The Muslim ruler or nizam of Hyderabad faced the same dilemma as Maharaja Hari Singh. He wanted independence but was far from sure he could achieve it. Jinnah understood that it was never realistic to expect the nizam to accede to Pakistan: Hyderabad was entirely surrounded by Indian territory. But he always hoped that the nizam could pull off independence. He considered Hyderabad to be the ‘oldest Muslim dynasty in India’ and hoped that its continued existence as an independent state right in the heart of India would provide a sense of security for those Muslims who didn’t move to Pakistan. Once again, however, Jinnah was thinking in terms of legally possible options rather than political realities. In the long term the independence of Hyderabad, while constitutionally proper, was never going to happen. The new Indian leadership saw the issue clearly enough and when the nizam tried to strike a deal which would allow him to hang on to some degree of autonomy, Delhi flatly refused to consider the idea.

In retrospect most Pakistanis would agree that it would have been worth abandoning the aspiration for an independent Hyderabad if it had meant securing Kashmir’s accession to Pakistan. Furthermore, Jinnah had good reason to believe that such a deal could have been struck. In late November 1947 Nehru and Liaquat Ali Khan met to discuss the situation in Kashmir. To understand their conversation it is first necessary to consider briefly what had happened in yet another Princely State, Junagadh.

The Muslim nawab of Junagadh ruled over a million people, 80 per cent of them Hindus. Junagadh was located in western India and, even though it was not strictly contiguous with Pakistan, its coastline offered the possibility of sea links to the Muslim state that was just 200 miles away. The nawab of Junagadh, guided by his pro-Pakistani chief minister Sir Shah Nawaz Bhutto (the father of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto), decided to ignore the feelings of his Hindu population and acceded to Pakistan. It was the mirror image of the situation in Kashmir. The Indian government did not accept the decision, blockaded Junagadh and then invaded it. Delhi then imposed a plebiscite and secured the result it desired: Junagadh became part of India. When Liaquat Ali Khan met Nehru at the end of November he exposed the illogicality of India’s position. If Junagadh, despite its Muslim rulers’ accession to Pakistan, belonged to India because of its Hindu majority, then Kashmir surely belonged to Pakistan. When Liaquat Ali Kahn made this incontrovertible point his Indian interlocutor, Sardar Patel, could not contain himself and burst out: ‘Why do you compare Junagadh with Kashmir? Talk of Hyderabad and Kashmir and we could reach agreement.’ Patel was not alone in this view. On 29 October 1947 officials at the American embassy in Delhi had told the US State Department: ‘the obvious solution is for the government leaders in Pakistan and India to agree … [to the] accession of Kashmir to Pakistan and the accession of Hyderabad and Junagadh to India’. British officials in London concurred.

Source: Pakistan: Eye of the Storm - Owen Bennett Jones

Page 68-69

 

[Tshering22]

Revolts continue because our government LETS them. I wonder why?

 

[SekrutYakhni]

let me present you with some historical facts...on border and then decide about who got balls and who need to prove..

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kargil War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



we guys sing and dance when we have peaceful time in our country...unlike some nations where people are busy running to save their a$$ from the bomb blast all round the year. and yes we'll dance on the borders too..as we did after every victory.

Can you please share some dance moves with me because when we poke a sword in your (India) arse, we will need some strong dance moves. Perhaps break dance?

 

[parasite]

Can you please share some dance moves with me because when we poke a sword in your (India) arse, we will need some strong dance moves. Perhaps break dance?

hahaha sword in which century you are living in.......