rameez ahmed
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
- Messages
- 338
- Reaction score
- 0
InshaALLAH Indian soldiers will get their due now for their atrocity over innocent Kashmiris... InShaALLAH they will be destroyed ........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is there to acknowledge?Pakistanis seem to refuse to acknowledge the fact that the policemen firing are locals themselves.
Easy Fateh, no reason to lose your cool.
So where are you guys move this Yatra thing?
InshaALLAH Indian soldiers will get their due now for their atrocity over innocent Kashmiris... InShaALLAH they will be destroyed ........
Yes, yes, "WERE" -- And what are now Hindus were just caste members and before that they were something else - don't trot out that rubbish and expect it to be persuasive.
Don't want to move it? then, don't - easy. eh? Why does the Secular Indian government seems to end up killing Muslims, even when the protests are anti-US? Or is it Anti-India and anti-US are the same thing? I think they might be in the minds of most captive Kashmiri.
Yes, yes, "WERE" -- And what are now Hindus were just caste members and before that they were something else - don't trot out that rubbish and expect it to be persuasive.
Don't want to move it? then, don't - easy. eh? Why does the Secular Indian government seems to end up killing Muslims, even when the protests are anti-US? Or is it Anti-India and anti-US are the same thing? I think they might be in the minds of most captive Kashmiri.
Kashmir has extensive religious, cultural and linguistic ties with India.
No comparison can be completely identical, but in both cases, regardless of the attempts by the Indian State to cover up its forced annexation of the territory and people of Kashmir, the fact is that the people and territory are forcibly occupied.Not accurate comparison AM because
1. British never allowed Indians to be elected to positions of power and Indians did not vote to the BRitish parliament. Kashmiris can vote people to the Indian parliament and Kashmirs have been PMs of India and even now three ethnic Kashmiris hold prime ministerial posts. Something impossible in colonial Britain
Again, does not change the fact that the people and territory are occupied and denied the promised right to self-determination. Occupiers can implement any number of policies to legitemize their occupation and win over the occupied, the fact that the people are occupied however does not change, and it is patently obvious that in Kashmir the people refuse to accept Indian occupation.2. After the acession being singed, Kashmiris voted the first parliament decades before a similar exercise would be done in Pakistan, which became the constituent assembly. Following which the elected parliament ratified the ascession to India and passed land reforms becoming one of the first states in India to do so. Something like this was impossible in colonial British that actually worked hand in hand with the landlords, one of the reason why these landlords still hold so much sway in Pakistan.
So does Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal, or for that matter Afghanistan - that does not justify the occupation and annexation of Afghan/Pakistani/Sri lankan/Bangladeshi/Nepali territory by India.3. The British had no cultural or linguistic ties with India, while Kashmir has extensive religious, cultural and linguistic ties with India.
when even the sepratists and pro-Pakistani elements like Geelani are not against the Yatra, they why should GoI move it
Its the physical location that is sacred.
3. The British had no cultural or linguistic ties with India, while Kashmir has extensive religious, cultural and linguistic ties with India.
Indians should really stop using this canard to justify the occupation of Kashmir, because in reality it is code for claiming all of South Asia, since the argument can be extended to any nation in South Asia, as I pointed out above.