foxbat
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,093
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
So lets talk in about 140 years?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
Because much of it had nothing to do with Kashmir, and the rest of it was a rant based on imaginary comments, about the article, attributed to Pakistanis.
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
How long did the British invade and occupy the sub-continent for?
India's aukat is no different.
Finally NYT notices Kashmir. Indian delusions and the delusions it had successfully sold to the world are now quickly unraveling. Kashmiris want Azadi, nothing can stop them now.
Karthic Sri,
Was India willing to have it partitioned on the basis of religion the first time it happened? Plus your argument is "We won't do" doesn't help in addressing the problems on ground. Kashmiris are out on rage, Moists are out with their guns drawn and your sensible argument is "Weather you like or not".. I wonder if you would do all the because Pakistan liked or not?
Kashmirs are not asking to divide India "again". It was never a part of India and this is the basis of case put in United Nation, by India itself. Hope you would get foundations of the issue right this time.
The terrorism in Pakistan is primarily the result of the Afghan conflict, and the US invasion of Afghanistan, and not the Kashmir conflict.
And I fail to see how any Indian can morally and ethically not support the right to self-determination promised to Kashmiris by India herself.
got any other sources with the same information? I was reviewing the site and it looks to be a hastily made blog; not a source for neutrally reported news
just for the record, Kashmir is a Muslim majority region as you may be aware
Why another source..? Just because it is not in conformity with ur version of "reality" it becomes a hastily made blog..?
Then wat abt the moin ansaris,ahmed Qureshis ,Christina palmers woot doing rounds here..?
Was not always...
New Recruit
No I won't shut up my little ignorant sister. I know you dream of a different history while walking on the road of doom. Just a suggestion, you should actively advise your next generations after a further split...which is more likely now....that atleat they should manage theirleft ovr affairs to save what would have left by then..and personnel in RAF are from Somalia
They are verymuch Indian, including people of Kashmiri origin. But they are Indian Police Force.....not Indian Army. D I have to teach you the difference between Police Force and Army.....or is the passions due to this period of little blood has made you blind altogether.
You should SHUT UP and Concentrate on bharti mentality you might be able to reform yourself
and personnel in RAF are from Somalia
You should SHUT UP and Concentrate on bharti mentality you might be able to reform yourself
United Nations officially confirming that Indian troops are unauthorizedly using UN helmets in Kashmir:
Youtube/watch?v=kEWnNDzsQm0
(Moderator requested to put this video in the first post of thread)
Allow me to help you:
YouTube - Indian troops using UN helmets in Kashmir
P.S. Those still in denial can sniff some coffee now.