Why should the Kashmiris have to give up the land the own and their ancestors lived on? Your argument is rather similar to that of made in favor of demographic engineering by the Indian State by moving in millions of Hindus and Buddhists, except you want to forcibly remove millions first.
It is their land and they have a right to it. The UNSC resolutions and the promises made them by the Indian leadership at partition assured them that.
No offence.....but that argument does not hold true in modern civilization.....people of all nations have made compromises and learnt to live as assimilated members of nations where they are not a majority, where the rulers were not originally from the land...etc etc...
Millions of Hindus had to leave their ancestral homes and lands in Pakistan thanks to partition.....including my Grandmother...
The Tibetians are NOT Chinese....and are fast becoming a minority in their own country
Native Amricans are a minority in their own lands.....
Just to name a few.....
Comparitively Kashmiris have remained homogenous thanks to India's special status to Kashmir and Kashmiris....
Kashmiris will have to learn to live.....
Nobody is taking away their freedom....they have the right to form their govenrnment, make state laws and practice religion freely without being diluted by cultures from accross various parts of India....
And lastly, the broken record that is the UNSC resolutions is nothing more than a failed attempt by Pakistanis to ignite a lost cause.....
Please note that there was something called the Shimla agreement that was signed by both parties and violated by Pakistan on a multitude of occasions.....if you cant keep up to your end of the bargain......what makes you think UNSC NON-BINDING resolutions hold any merit for India?