What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
I'd like to see the look on their faces when they come prancing across the border and wipe out another 200 people. I really don't know where India thinks its headed with this soft attitude towards terrorism.

This is an act of facilitation of terrorism in India by the GOI itself...

Before you condemn the Government, look into the background of the case. The release was ordered by the Supreme Court of India, in a case filed by Bhim Singh, of the J&K Panthers Party.
The defence of the government for not releasing these men was that they were waiting for an equal number of prisoners to be released by Pakistan.
The Supreme Court rejected this argument.


Court orders release, deportation of 16 Pakistani prisoners


NEW DELHI, March 10, 2010
The Supreme Court on Monday directed the Union government to deport in two months 16 Pakistani prisoners languishing in jail even after completion of their sentence for offences under the Public Safety Act of Jammu and Kashmir.

A Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and R.M. Lodha rejected the government's argument that they could be released only if an equal number of Indian prisoners in Pakistan were released and sent home.

The Bench gave this direction on a petition filed by Bhim Singh, leader of the Jammu and Kashmir Panthers Party, seeking release of all Pakistanis detained in different jails of Agra, Jodhpur, Naini, Sangrur, Varanasi and Tihar. He submitted that there was no case against them and they had served their prison term.

Those ordered released are: Mohammad Ajmal, Mehrban Sathi, Mohammad Nawaz, Sajad Ali Jat, Shabir Ahmed, Shahzad Gul, Shahid Mehmood, Qudrat Ullah, Mohammad Farooq Raja, Dawood Ahmed Mughal, Faiz Ali, Mohammad Usman Shiksh, Zarar Baloch, Shahid Latief, Suhail Ahmed Kataria and Sher Khan. They had already been provided travel documents by Pakistan.

Justice Katju told Centre's counsel: “This court is the custodian of the civil rights of every person, Indian or foreigner, under Article 21 of the Constitution and no person shall be deprived of his life or liberty without the procedure established by law. This provision in the Indian Constitution cannot be allowed to be diluted.”

He observed: “How can the government keep them in detention in violation of the fundamental rights of a person for years together without resorting to the procedure of law?” The right to life and liberty was not dependent on another country's action, he said.

Centre's stand

In its affidavit, the Centre said 22 prisoners who had completed their sentences and detained in different jails were recommended for deportation by the by Jammu and Kashmir government. It said Pakistan, while clearing the names of 16 persons, had neither sent travelling documents nor cleared the names of five others — Mohd Aslam Mughal alias Zahoor Ahmed, Manzoor Ahmad Sheikh, Liaquat Ali Khan alias Mehboob Ali and Abdul Qadeer Khawaja, but consular access had been provided to them. In respect of one person his nationality could not be verified, the affidavit said.

The Hindu : News / National : Court orders release, deportation of 16 Pakistani prisoners


Well you do have a very strange and weird constitution. Anyways please apply this constitution to the poor fishermen also and release them.
:cheers:
Maybe strange and weird to you. But it proved beneficial to some of your fellow citizens. In light of the above judgement, I think the government would have to release fishermen after they finish their jail terms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sab
.
A recent survey in Indian- and Pakistani-administered Kashmir has produced "striking results". The poll was conducted by Robert Bradnock - an associate fellow at the Chatham House think-tank in London - and here he assesses the results.
Indian paramilitary soldiers detain a Kashmiri youth in Srinagar Most Kashmiris yearn for peace

Given the significance of the 63-year-old dispute over Kashmir - for India, for Pakistan and above all for Kashmiris - it is remarkable how few attempts there have been to test opinion in Kashmir itself about attitudes to key issues in the dispute.

Two polls in the last decade have sampled opinion in Indian Jammu and Kashmir. Opinion has also been explored outside Kashmir in the cities of India and Pakistan.

Yet the poll published on 26 May at Chatham House was the first ever to be taken on both sides of the Line of Control (LoC).
Urgently felt

Its key results are striking.

Unemployment and other economic issues, for example, rank high across the whole of Pakistani held Kashmir and Indian held Jammu and Kashmir.

Indeed economic issues were among the few that united opinion in nearly all the sampled districts on both sides of the LoC.
A Jammu and Kashmir Police officer interacts with Village Defence Committee (VDC) members near Jammu
Continue reading the main story
The poll shows that there is more room than many had anticipated in Kashmiri opinion itself for negotiation.
At first glance economic problems seem to be the top priority in the minds of many Kashmiris, and more important than solving the dispute itself.

Yet when asked how important the dispute was to them personally, 80% overall said it was very important - 75% in Pakistan-administered Kashmir and 82% in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.

The search for a solution is thus urgently felt.

On many other issues, however, opinions were sharply divided, notably by geographical distribution.

The headline figures of 44% (in Pakistan-administered Kashmir) and 43% (in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir) opting for independence, for example, conceals wide regional disparities.

While in the predominantly Muslim Kashmir Valley in Indian-administered Kashmir, the proportion in favour of independence ranged from 74%-95%.

But in the four districts of the predominantly Hindu Jammu part of Indian-administered Kashmir, there was virtually no support for independence at all.

In response to the question "Will an end to militant violence help to end the conflict?" opinion ranged from 0% in Rajouri to 98% in Anantnag and Kathua, while in Pakistan-administered Kashmir it ranged from 27% in Kotli to 75% in Bagh.
Resolution

This was a professionally designed and implemented poll. I worked with Ipsos MORI (based in London) on the poll's design.

FACTS Worldwide (Mumbai) and Aftab Associates Private Limited (Pakistan) used specially trained interviewers to carry out the face-to-face interviews in four languages.
Protest in Srinagar Many Kashmiris - but not a majority - favour independence

It was funded by a charitable organisation run by Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, the son of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

Dr Gaddafi's foundation had already been funding development projects among Kashmiri refugees in Pakistan and India, and in 2002 approached me at King's College London to discuss issues surrounding the resolution of the dispute.

In line with his view that civil society has a vital role to play in resolving disputes worldwide, he sponsored the poll.

Engaging Kashmiri opinion emerged as one of the key features of the poll.

Three quarters of all Kashmiris - on both sides of the LoC - believe that all sides of Kashmiri opinion should be consulted in negotiations over the future of Kashmir.

An optimistic sign is the apparent sense of flexibility among many Kashmiris in seeking a solution.

Only 27% of all Kashmiris are in favour of the LoC in its present form (22% in Pakistani-administered Kashmir and 29% in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir.)
All-or-nothing

In three districts in Kashmir valley support for the present LoC falls to 1%, while in Kargil it is 0%.

However, if the movement across the LoC were to be fully liberalised, support for keeping the LoC rises dramatically to 85% overall.
Even in the Kashmir valley it rises to over 80%, and in Pakistan-administered Kashmir to over 90%.
It is perhaps the attitudes to the LoC that are most significant.

Both Pakistan and India have been very reluctant to consider openly any question that the LoC might be made permanent.

For Pakistan in particular the issue has been presented in all-or-nothing terms, and the possibility that the LoC might be made permanent has been taboo - as it is for some major Kashmiri groups.

Yet there are many signs that the LoC has become a de facto part of life, and for some a vital part of their security.

Indeed, only 8% said that they were not in favour of the LoC in any form.

As the poll showed, while 8% of the total population claimed to have friends or family on the other side, less than 1% had visited the other side of the LoC in the last five years.

In this light it is not surprising that in Poonch and Rajouri, two key border districts in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir, more than 90% are in favour of keeping the LoC.

The conversion of the LoC to a "soft" border reportedly played a large part in the Musharraf government's back channel talks with India.

The poll finding that across Kashmir around one quarter are strongly opposed to changing the LoC while a further half would accept it if it is liberalised gives a strong signal that this could be a fruitful area for further negotiation.

And the poll shows that there is more room than many had anticipated in Kashmiri opinion itself for negotiation.

The bigger question is whether the governments of India and Pakistan have the confidence, the power and the goodwill to meet the urgent aspirations of the Kashmiris for a peaceful and permanent settlement.
BBC News - Kashmir mulls comprehensive opinion poll
 
.
.
.
Okay fine... mainly I wanted to know the point of view of a person from Pakistan, without bringing in reason for war/conflict etc... I don't assert for source anymore...

I only wish the bolded part happens always... And if there was a situation because of which the insurgents or the so called freedom fighters were told to do some productive work, then let us hope that the same situation comes back forever...

And nobody from eiether side has to die and no development has to stop in eiether side of Kashmir... (because continuing this as far I see there will be no results at all (our side of Kashmir being with us, and your side of Kashmir being with you), our side sits a huge trained army and your side is sending some very less number of proxies, and this will continue forever if this is let to happen as it is now)...


it was a good discussion with you thanks...

I want there to be peace in kashmir but its only going to happen once we follow through on a plan.
From my understanding musharaff accepted the key demand of the indian govt that cross border movement be stopped and that this one move would signal to the indians that the pakistani were showing "good will" and taking concrete measures.
Once we stopped the fighters from crossing it was your turn to make a major gesture which from my point of view you never did.
A few measures like letting a bus through is not the same as us stopping the fighters.
I think it started alright with the the first phase of the indian plan plan being a media blitz on indian tv over the issue to get a better consensus and and mentally preparing the population for resolution on the issue,but for some reason it moved away from this path toward taking full advantage of the lull in kashmir to build fences and reinforce bunkers ect.
From the intital demand that you wanted the fighters to stop crossing the LOC it started to increase with deamnds that training camps be closed and the leaders of the freedom fighters be handed over.
From my point of view i think if a small part of the indian army has started pulling out it would have been a good move (you could have always reinforced the police as counter measure).
The next move could have been to let human right groups in and give free access to the media and start to get the roads-bridges linked up again which could be opened the same day the training camps are closed down.
These are just rough ideas but we need to understand each others concerns and address them and move forward with a plan.:smitten:
 
Last edited:
.
I want there to be peace in kashmir but its only going to happen once we follow through on a plan.
From my understanding musharaff accepted the key demand of the indian govt that cross border movement be stopped and that this one move would signal to the indians that the pakistani were showing "good will" and taking concrete measures.
Once we stopped the fighters from crossing it was your turn to make a major gesture which from my point of view you never did.
A few measures like letting a bus through is not the same as us stopping the fighters.
I think it started alright with the the first phase of the indian plan plan being a media blitz on indian tv over the issue to get a better consensus and and mentally preparing the population for resolution on the issue,but for reason it moved away from this path toward taking full advantage of the lull in kashmir to build fences and reinforce bunkers ect.
From the intital demand that you wanted the fighters to stop crossing the LOC it started to increase with deamnds that training camps be closed and the leaders of the freedom fighters be handed over.
From my point of view i think if a small part of the indian army has started pulling out it would have been a good move (you could have always reinforced the police as counter measure).
The next move could have been to let human right groups in and give free access to the media and start to get the roads-bridges linked up again which could be opened the same day the training camps are closed down.
These are just rough ideas but we need to understand each others concerns and address them and move forward with a plan.:smitten:

hmmm... there are some accusations about Indian Government's actions in your post... I have got absolutely no idea about the Kashmir problem in detail... so I cannot comment about that...

Anyways I request my fellow countrymen not to take this reply by dabong1 for any debate... and dabong1, I wanted to ask a few specific things to get to know point of view about them from a Pakistani, and it is done....


Let us not discuss about the other problems as I have absolutely no idea about them...
 
.
I want there to be peace in kashmir but its only going to happen once we follow through on a plan.
From my understanding musharaff accepted the key demand of the indian govt that cross border movement be stopped and that this one move would signal to the indians that the pakistani were showing "good will" and taking concrete measures.
Once we stopped the fighters from crossing it was your turn to make a major gesture which from my point of view you never did.
A few measures like letting a bus through is not the same as us stopping the fighters.
I think it started alright with the the first phase of the indian plan plan being a media blitz on indian tv over the issue to get a better consensus and and mentally preparing the population for resolution on the issue,but for reason it moved away from this path toward taking full advantage of the lull in kashmir to build fences and reinforce bunkers ect.
From the intital demand that you wanted the fighters to stop crossing the LOC it started to increase with deamnds that training camps be closed and the leaders of the freedom fighters be handed over.
From my point of view i think if a small part of the indian army has started pulling out it would have been a good move (you could have always reinforced the police as counter measure).
The next move could have been to let human right groups in and give free access to the media and start to get the roads-bridges linked up again which could be opened the same day the training camps are closed down.
These are just rough ideas but we need to understand each others concerns and address them and move forward with a plan.:smitten:

Yeah they stopped thru Kashmir ..but came thru Arabian sea and did a carnage in Mumbai.
Nothing wrong with the demand of closing down terrorist camps...gotta strike at the root.not prune the branches.
A part of the IA is already moved out and noe the primary responsibilty of security is with RR and JK police.
Amnesty International already let in Kashmir
For roads railways to open shut down the camps,cant risk the lives of civilians by bombing of railway,buses by militants
 
.
Two hideouts smashed in J-K, arms seized
2/June/2010
Jammu, June 2 (PTI) Two militant hideouts were smashed and a cache of arms, including two AK rifles and three grenades, were seized by security forces from separate places in Jammu and Kashmir today.

Acting on an information, a police team launched a search operation in Draman Trag belt of Banihal teshil of Ramban district and busted a hideout, officials said.

They recovered one AK rifle with 150 rounds, three grenades and one binocular, the officials said.

Another hideout was smashed in Arnas area of Mahore tehsil in Reasi district by 54 Rashtriya Rifles, they said adding, one AK-47 rifle, seven rounds and three detonators were seized from there.fullstory
 
.
hal you should do a bit more research and see who is doing the killing and the rapping.
 
.
Srinagar, May 29 : The Ghost of fake encounters has come again to haunt the Indian Army as a Indian Army major and four other people, including a territorial army soldier, were booked for the murder of three civilians in a gun battle said to be staged in Jammu and Kashmir on April 30, police officials said here on Saturday, May 29.


Buzz up!The bodies of the three civilians – Shahzad Ahmad Khan, Riyaz Ahmad Lone and Muhammad Shafi Lone – were recovered on Friday,May 28 from a graveyard in Kalaroos village of Kupwara district. The bodies were identified by their relatives in the presence of a magistrate.


Bashir Ahmad, a former special police officer, and his colleague Fayaz Ahmad were arrested for the murder of the three men belonging to Nadihal village in Rafiabad of north Kashmir.

"Sustained interrogation of Lone and Ahmad unraveled the entire conspiracy. Abbas Hussain Shah, a jawan of the territorial army, is the kingpin of this nefarious conspiracy," a senior police officer told while unraveling the whole conspiracy.

Updating on the controversy the officer further added,"He, on the behest of an Army officer (major), conspired with Lone, Ahmad and Abdul Hamid Bhat to lure the three civilians. They were promised a wage of Rs.2,000 per day if they work as porters for the Army in the Machil sector of the Line of Control (LOC) where the unit of the involved major was posted,".

"After they fell into Hussain's trap, Lone, Ahmad and Bhat were taken to Sogam village in Kupwara where a vehicle was waiting for them to be taken to the LOC for the fake gun battle," he concluded .

Mob in Nadihal village invaded the house of Lone, the SPO who is one of the accused in this fake shoot out incident

The army is said to have killed three terrorists in Machil sector while trying to dislodge a infiltration bid on April 30.

OneIndia News

---------- Post added at 01:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:56 PM ----------

Jammu & Kashmir | Fake Encounters | India Army | Territorial Army Soldier | Indian Army Major | Civilians Murdered | Gun Battle - Oneindia News
 
.
SRINAGAR: An Indian Army major and four other people, including a territorial army soldier, were booked for the murder of three civilians in a staged gun battle in Jammu and Kashmir April 30, police said on Saturday.

The bodies of the three civilians – Shahzad Ahmad Khan, Riyaz Ahmad Lone and Muhammad Shafi Lone – were on Friday exhumed from a graveyard in Kalaroos village of Kupwara district and identified by their relatives in the presence of a magistrate.

Bashir Ahmad, a former special police officer, and his accomplice Fayaz Ahmad were arrested for the disappearance of the three men belonging to Nadihal village in Rafiabad of north Kashmir.

Abbas Hussain Shah, a jawan of the territorial army, who is the kingpin of the conspiracy, was also arrested on Saturday, police said.

"Sustained interrogation of Lone and Ahmad unravelled the entire conspiracy. Abbas Hussain Shah, a jawan of the territorial army, is the kingpin of this nefarious conspiracy," a senior police officer said.

"He, on the behest of an Army officer (major), conspired with Lone, Ahmad and Abdul Hamid Bhat to lure the three civilians. They were promised a wage of Rs.2,000 per day if they work as porters for the Army in the Machil sector of the Line of Control (LOC) where the unit of the involved major was posted," he said.

"After they fell into Hussain's trap, Lone, Ahmad and Bhat were taken to Sogam village in Kupwara where a vehicle was waiting for them to be taken to the LOC for the fake gun battle," he added.

Police sources also said police had become suspicious of the genuineness of "the LOC gunfight in Machil sector April 30 when the bodies of three slain people were handed over to them for burial".

"All the three had bullet wounds in their heads which is highly unlikely in a gunfight between the security forces and the militants. All of them were dressed in summer clothes, which is not possible for militants crossing the snowbound LOC where the gunfight was claimed to have occurred," the police officer said.

Meanwhile, an angry mob in Nadihal village torched the house of Lone, the SPO who is one of the conspirators in the murder of the three civilians.

The army claimed to have killed three terrorists in Machil sector of the LOC after foiling an infiltration bid April 30.

It was also claimed that a large quantity of arms and ammunition had been recovered from the slain terrorists.

Army officer, jawan booked in J&K fake encounter case - India - The Times of India
 
.
Beggar killed in fake encounter in J&K
Despite clear instructions that human rights violations will not be tolerated, there has been another instance where the Army has been found wanting.

The man who the Army claimed was a foreign militant killed in an encounter three days ago was identified as 70-year-old Habibullah Khan - a beggar from Kupwara in Jammu and Kashmir.

The revelation triggered immediate protests.

"He was killed and dubbed as militant by the Army in Handwara. When we saw his photo we identified him," said Shafiq Ahmad Khan, a relative.

The post-mortem report suggests the man was shot from close range. Police have lodged a murder case against the Army's 6 Rashtriya Rifles.

"The body was identified on Friday; he is a resident of Dolab. We are investigating and the FIR has already been lodged," said Kuldeep Khuda, DGP, Jammu and Kashmir.

On Wednesday, the Army claimed to have killed a foreign militant, found an AK Rifle and ammunition during a joint operation with the police. But the police denied being part of any such an encounter.

Today, the Army came up with another version that contradicts their earlier claims.

"We expect that the deceased was either being used as a guide or may have been held as human shield by terrorists who melted away into the jungles," said Defence spokesman Lt Col Brar.

But what about the arms and ammunition shown to establish that the man killed was a militant?

"The weapon which was found next to the terrorist may have been dropped, possibly by fleeing terrorists when they came under fire," said Brar.

It is not the first time when innocent people are killed in fake encounters and branded as foreign terrorist in Jammu and Kashmir. But what's more shocking this time is that a 70-year-old, frail, greybeard man was passed off as a success in the Army's fight against militancy.
Beggar killed in fake encounter in J&K
 
.
Why I screamed, rape us, take our flesh’

Laishram Gyaneswari was among the twelve Manipuri mothers who stripped themselves four years ago to shame the Indian Army. TERESA REHMAN meets the iconic protestor


IT’S EARLY HOURS on Imphal’s Nagamapal Road. Fateh Chand Jain, proprietor of the Indo-Myanmar Furniture Shop, is unlocking its wooden shutters. He deflects enquiries about his wife, Ima Laishram Gyaneswari, with a self-effacing wave: “You put your questions to her. I don’t interfere in her matters.” But press him a little more and he speaks with pride of how this 56-year-old Meitei homemaker joined a dozen Manipuri imas, mothers, on July 15, 2004, to lay storm to the Assam Rifles headquarters at Kangla Fort. Stripping naked, they thronged the gates, screaming their outrage at the rape and alleged custodial murder of Thangjam Manorama, a 32-year-old suspected member of the banned People’s Liberation Army. Jain recalls how he didn’t even know what his wife had left the house for that day; it was only in the afternoon that he got to know of the imas’ unprecedented act of protest. “I had an inkling my wife might be involved. She had touched my feet before she left the house, something she usually does when she leaves for something important. But this time she didn’t tell me where she was going.”

“I’m very proud of her. Not everyone can be so brave, isn’t it?” he adds.

Gyaneswari joins us at this point, walking in fresh from prayers at the small temple in the courtyard. A science graduate from Ghana Priya Women’s College, Imphal, she had been an ardent political activist as a student, something she set aside after her marriage when bringing up four children took priority. Yet she remained an active member of the local chapter of the Meira Paibi, the mass-based Meitei women’s human rights movement.

Of enduring anguish was the incendiary Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA). “Back in 1960,” Gyaneswari recounts, “some J&K Rifles personnel raped a girl named Chanu Rose; she committed suicide afterwards. Ever since then, there have been several incidents of molestation, rape and torture by army men; even pregnant women were not spared. All these pained me deeply.” Then there were the many young people taken away by army personnel, never to be seen again. “I know of many mothers who have gone insane after their sons and daughters disappeared.”

Thangjam Manorama was one of those taken into the security forces’ custody, never to return. She was arrested on July 11, 2004. Her body was found the next day, dumped near her home, branded with marks of rape and torture. “Our Meira Paibi members saw her body being brought to the Regional Institute of Medical Science for the post-mortem, and they spread word of the incident. I was heart-broken when I heard. If this is what lies ahead for the young girls of Manipur, what will become of our community? We had to rise up to protect our girls,” says Gyaneswari.

On July 12, 2004, 32 local organisations came together in a conglomeration called Apunba Lup, to launch a movement to demand the AFSPA be repealed. But Gyaneswari and her associates felt this was not enough. Gathering for a closed-door meeting on July 13, they debated alternative ways of confronting the situation. “What emerged in our discussion was the feeling that we, the women of Manipur, were virtually naked — we were always insecure, forever at risk of molestation by the security forces. Why then should we not walk in the streets naked, what clearer protest could we make to teach a lesson not just to the security forces here but to the whole world?”

One hundred women were to congregate at Kangla Fort. Gyaneswari left home at 6 in the morning. “I touched my husband’s feet before I left,” she says. “In my mind, I


Outrage: The July 15,2004, protest outside the Assam Rifles headquarters
asked him to forgive me because I was going to do something very crucial and I couldn’t possibly tell him about it.” By the time she reached the gates of Kangla Fort, 30 women had assembled there; 10 more trickled by a little later. While these were nowhere near the numbers that had been hoped for, time was getting on. “We felt that if we delayed, the security forces might get suspicious and impose a curfew,” explains Gyaneswari. Steeling themselves to make a rush on the gate, the protestors did not realise that there were finally only 12 of them. “I did not count the number of women then. I had no awareness of anything. I was in my own world, shouting slogans, screaming at the Indian Army to rape us, take our flesh. All that filled my mind was the image of Manorama’s corpse,” she recalls.

The imas met the men of the Assam Rifles unit with fire in their hearts, Gyaneswari says. “It was the culmination of the rage and agony we had harboured for years. We challenged them to come out and rape us before everyone. We demanded they tell us what they were stationed here for: to protect our people or to rape our women.”

Returning home that day, Gyaneswari says she was apprehensive of how her family would react. “I was scared,” she smiles as she cuddles her grandchild, “I had not sought my husband’s permission. But he told me that I had done the right thing as whatever I had done was for the women of Manipur.” Her mother, Laishram Gambhini, and her four children all felt stirred by her courage. Says her elder daughter Girija, “My mother has inspired us to do something for our women. My mother’s willpower is very strong. I have never seen her weak or breaking down. She can face anything alone.”

FOUR YEARS later, does Ima Gyaneswari feel any change after that day of radical protest? “I do feel the armed forces are more cautious while dealing with women now. The acts of molestation, rape and torture have come down. But the inhuman crimes committed under the AFSPA’S cover persist. Anybody can still be arrested or killed without explanation.”

She is also surprised at the apathy of both the Central and the state governments to the Manipuri mothers’ courageous protest. “The indifference of the government is really distressing. They are behaving as if they had neither seen nor heard a thing. Nobody ever came to meet us, not even to ask why 12 mothers of Manipur had to stage such a demonstration.”

But it cannot be this way forever, she feels. She speaks of Irom Sharmila Chanu, who has been on a hunger strike since November 2000, demanding that AFSPA be repealed. “Irom was awarded the Gwangju Prize for Human Rights 2007 by the Gwangju Asian Human Rights Folk School of South Korea. We have activists worldwide talking about the repeal of the Act. The government will have to listen to us sooner or later,” she says

Some preliminary steps have already been taken to phase out the Act. A review committee was formed and its recommendations have been submitted to the Centre. But will peace return once the Act is repealed? There are still 20 militant outfits active in Manipur, and bordering Myanmar is a safe haven for rebel groups.

Gyaneswari points out that the AFSPA was imposed to control the insurgency in Manipur, but it has actually inflamed the rebels. “The Act is harming the very social fabric of Manipur. Common people are suffering as this Act has led to more intense conflict between the insurgent groups and the armed forces. The Act has to go.” •

Tehelka - India's Independent Weekly News Magazine
 
.
To cite some examples, in the year 1991, Indian army raped 30 women in Kunan- Poshpura in Kupwara aged between 18 to 85 years. 15 years have passed since the incident took place; neither justice nor compensation has knocked at the doors of these unfortunate mothers and daughters. While separatists address their plight by stating that they have lost their honour for a greater cause, state government orders an inquiry which remains inconclusive and guilty get rewards for having fought militancy tooth and nail

Militancy Toll; J&K Women Pay Heavy Price By Syed Junaid Hashmi
 
.
hal since you didn't do the research i kindly provided it for you. by the way most of these articles are from indian sites.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom