What's new

Kashmir | News & Discussions.

So, is new media only reinforcing old stereotypes?


  • Total voters
    44
People routinely criticize the Pakistan Army for excesses for its war on the western front. That is no excuse to beat up someone for talking about human rights violations

I think you have leave two faced, two standard policy

If we start to talk this matter in deep so you put than in troll and flaming category

From my point of view farooq got what he deserve so its better for him to stick to Srinagar with those 2% paid protesters and feel happy.
 
.
Well what do you expect from the worlds biggest hypocrisy?
 
.
Its surprising how Indians are only seeing Kashmiri Pandits mentioned and are trying their very best to hide the fact that Vishwa Hindu Prasad has been clearly mentioned by media outlets!


Like Umar Abdullah, the Indian appointed illegal CM of Kashmir has stated, Mirwaiz got beaten because of his own fault. People are asking how is India at fault here? Akkhan walay Annay.

You are assuming that there are no Kashmiri Pandits in VHP..

Also by your definition, armed insurgents attaking Indian armed forces are respectable lot and can not be called terrorists. But 1 unarmed civilian who gets upset at a Kashmiri separatist and unsuccessfully tries to beat him up represents terrorism.. Also remember that he was unsuccessfule because the Bad and evil Indian security forces prevented him from beating some one up who was openly committing a crime.

Before you jump into the disputed state arguement, do remember that the Kashmiri leader was making this statement in Punjab where IPC is applicable and promoting secession is an illegal act

Akkhan walay Annay... Anyone???
 
.
They are not kids but young men, so they were living in Kashmir before freedom fighters tried to pull off a Afghanistan there.

Well they aren't that old either. In fact it's been nearly two decades when they were thrown out of IOK. Who knows their experience of childhood spent at refugee camps in Indian main land still haunts them.:D

Knowing the socio-cultural practises in some parts of Pakistan, if I were a Pakistani, I wouldn't have taken a dig at Indians on paedophilia!

Knowing the socio-cultural practices that emerge out of of both rural and urban India in the daily news I can take the gall to dig at you guys.:)
 
. .
Ah just some kids frustrated over spending their childhood with some paedophile. They will grow up once they will forget their past.:D

:lol:
Well they aren't that old either. In fact it's been nearly two decades when they were thrown out of IOK. Who knows their experience of childhood spent at refugee camps in Indian main land still haunts them.:D



Knowing the socio-cultural practices that emerge out of of both rural and urban India in the daily news I can take the gall to dig at you guys.:)



It seems you can get away with your bull$hit even though Admin is regularly contributing to the topic(including handing out bans and suspensions).

First time around, I did not reply because I thought, your post will invariably be deleted, but now it seems you will continue to post nonsense(and no action will be taken) until an unless confronted with a equally nonsense reply and this thread turn into a troll fest .
 
.
the whole of kashmir and jammu is highly diverse with dozen of different languages spoken. The case made to discredit Pakistan in above article fails miserably! end of the day the AJK retains it sense of identity and culture while the Indian side is being forced to "indianize"

I think this can help you some more

Freedom in the World 2008 - Kashmir [Pakistan]

Political Rights and Civil Liberties

The political rights of the residents of Pakistani-administered Kashmir remain severely limited. Neither the Northern Areas nor Azad Kashmir has representation in Pakistan's national Parliament. The Northern Areas are directly administered by the Pakistani government under the Legal Framework Order of 1994; the region is not included in the Pakistani constitution and has no constitution of its own, meaning there is no fundamental guarantee of civil rights, democratic representation, or the separation of powers. Executive authority is vested in the minister for Kashmir affairs, a civil servant appointed by Islamabad. A 36-seat Northern Areas Legislative Council (NALC) – of which 24 seats are filled through direct elections and six each are reserved for women and technocrats from each district – serves in an advisory capacity and has no authority to change laws or control revenue. Elections to the NALC were held in 2004, with independent candidates and representatives of national political parties winning seats. In October 2007, Pakistani president Pervez Musharraf announced a package of reforms that would change the NALC into the Northern Areas Legislative Assembly, devolving fiscal and legislative powers to locally elected politicians. The package would also allow for the election of a chief executive accountable to the assembly, but it would maintain federal control over the judiciary and the top executive post of "chairman." The region would continue to be administered under the Legal Framework Order rather than a constitutional framework like in Azad Kashmir, thus still falling short of compliance with a 1999 Supreme Court ruling on the issue. At year's end, Pakistan's broader political crisis cast doubt on the future of the proposed reforms.

Azad Kashmir has an interim constitution, an elected unicameral assembly, a prime minister, and a president who is elected by the legislative assembly. Both the president and the assembly serve five-year terms. Of the 49 assembly seats, 41 are filled through direct elections and eight are reserved seats (five for women and one each for representatives of overseas Kashmiris, technocrats, and religious leaders). However, Pakistan exercises considerable control over the structures of government and electoral politics. Islamabad's approval is required to pass legislation, and the minister for Kashmir affairs handles the daily administration of the state and controls the budget. The Pakistani military retains a guiding role on issues of politics and governance.

As detailed by Human Rights Watch (HRW) in a 2006 report on the region, individuals and political parties who do not support Kashmir's accession to Pakistan are barred from participating in the political process, standing for election, taking a job with any government institution, or accessing educational institutions. At least 60 proindependence candidates who belonged to the JKLF, the APNA, and smaller political parties were barred from participating in the July 2006 Azad Kashmir legislative assembly elections. Overall, HRW noted that the election process was flawed and "greeted with widespread charges of poll rigging by opposition political parties and independent analysts." However, unlike the 2001 elections, the polls featured few instances of physical violence and harassment – aside from threats – against candidates or their supporters, possibly because of the greater international presence in the wake of the earthquake. In general, antiaccession parties and individuals are subject to surveillance, harassment, and sometimes imprisonment by Pakistani intelligence and security services.

In 2007, the political crisis in Pakistan reverberated in Kashmir. Chaudhry Majeed, the PPP president for Azad Kashmir, and other party activists were briefly detained in November following Musharraf's declaration of a state of emergency, with some placed under house arrest for 30 days. In December, demonstrators clashed with police, burned tires, and blocked roads in antigovernment protests after the assassination of PPP leader and former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, but there were no reported injuries.

Azad Kashmir receives a large amount of financial aid from the Pakistani government, especially following the 2005 earthquake, but successive administrations have been tainted by corruption and incompetence. A lack of official accountability has been identified as a key factor in the poor socioeconomic development of both Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas. Pakistani-controlled Kashmir was not rated separately in Transparency International's 2007 Corruption Perceptions Index.

The Pakistani government uses the constitution and other laws to curb freedom of speech on a variety of subjects, including the status of Kashmir and incidents of sectarian violence. In recent years, authorities have banned several local newspapers from publishing and have detained or otherwise harassed Kashmiri journalists. In March 2007, the government suspended its advertisements in publications by the Dawn English-language media group after it reported on a possible resurgence of official support for militants in Kashmir. In April 2007, Dawn reported that the editor and publisher of the banned monthly Kargil International magazine were indicted on sedition and defamation charges for publishing a proindependence article in 2004. In addition to pressure and threats from the authorities, journalists have been known to face harassment and attacks from nonstate actors, though no such incidents were reported in 2007. During the state of emergency imposed on the rest of Pakistan in November 2007, cable operators in Kashmir were instructed to suspend broadcasts of most national and international news channels.


Just read full story at
UNHCR | Refworld | Freedom in the World 2008 - Kashmir [Pakistan]
 
.
It seems you can get away with your bull$hit even though Admin is regularly contributing to the topic(including handing out bans and suspensions).

First time around, I did not reply because I thought, your post will invariably be deleted, but now it seems you will continue to post nonsense(and no action will be taken) until an unless confronted with a equally nonsense reply and this thread turn into a troll fest .

You reserve the right to leave the forum in protest. :wave:

;)
 
.
India state of Jammu and Kashmir. Neither Indian state nor India's integral part.

:rolleyes:
 
. .
this is indian so called democrazy , attack the person who talk against ur propoganda.
 
.
this is indian so called democrazy , attack the person who talk against ur propoganda.

Yes we have every right to attack a person who is talking against us in-front of us..

He have freedom of for his right and this freedom of speech cant we used against nation

I think our government in coward thats why people like him and roi is traveling freely in India ..

We really need strong governance like Nitish, Modi, Seela Dixit or Yedurappa not like Manmohan Singh who need permission of sonia for every thing
 
.
You reserve the right to leave the forum in protest. :wave:

;)

Well what do you expect from the worlds biggest hypocrisy?


They wont, how else will they get to troll against Pakistan?




^^ You guys neither have any knowledge based or intellectual additions to the topic at hand, rather behaving like pampered kid, "who thinks his father owns the company and therefore is their's by birth right."
 
.
^^ You guys neither have any knowledge based or intellectual addition to the topic at hand, rather behaving like pampered kid, "who thinks his father owns the company and therefore is their's by birth right."

Oh please, 99% of your countrymen join this forum to troll and annoy, so don't cry about how poor indians are being abused on here. This forum is pretty tolerant compared to others, especially your indian forums.
 
.
Well they aren't that old either. In fact it's been nearly two decades when they were thrown out of IOK. Who knows their experience of childhood spent at refugee camps in Indian main land still haunts them.:D

Don't confuse them with people from your place. They don't live in camps. We don't put our people in camps even in worst natural disasters! But nice of you talking about them thrown out of their birthplace, we are returning the favour to those who thrown them out as well, and right now my heart is not bleeding for them, because of you.
Knowing the socio-cultural practices that emerge out of of both rural and urban India in the daily news I can take the gall to dig at you guys.:)

Which ones? The one where the bury living people, or the one where they keep under-aged escorts? ;)
 
.
Back
Top Bottom