Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'Our struggle is against wrong policies of Pakistan and not against the State of Pakistan
Search through the forum please, there are plenty, like this one:Can you please share some articles on the development being carried out in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir??
I recently read about the unhapiness in Kashmiri's on the recent Gilgit-Baltistan proposal for governance......So why are the people in *** unhappy even with all the developments and foreign investment??
Kashmiri people send their reprentatives into Indian political structures so I can not accept that they are not so-called split ideology/momentum.
The UN resolutions remain the only neutral and consensus decision on resolving the dispute of Kashmir. The UNSC resolutions were accepted and committed to by all UNSC members, India and Pakistan, and the ruling of plebiscite is in sync with the rules of partition, under which any disputed accession was to be decided via plebiscite.As UN resultion is concerned, this is not compulsery.
There are also over 2 million Kashmiris, primarily from Pakistan's side, settled in Europe, primarily Britain. I assume they will be given a vote in such a plebiscite as well.The prequisite should be settling Kashmiri pundits and sikhs back into J&K, removing all forces etc.
That is not self-determination, and elections under India do not substitute for the plebiscite mandated by the rules of partition and UNSC resolutions - if that were the case then the UNSC resolutions would have stated that.Kashmiri people has a right to vote every five years as rest of India does. And they are already exercising right to determination through vote.
Its only a matter of time when Kashmiris on the other side of the LOC start wanting the same.
Its only human.
Cheers, Doc
The people of Quebec also participated in the Canadian legislature and Canadian way of life, the people and leaders of South Asia participated in the British run government and institutions while struggling for freedom - so what's your point?
The UN resolutions remain the only neutral and consensus decision on resolving the dispute of Kashmir. The UNSC resolutions were accepted and committed to by all UNSC members, India and Pakistan, and the ruling of plebiscite is in sync with the rules of partition, under which any disputed accession was to be decided via plebiscite.
And in any case, if as you say the separatists are so few in number, India has nothing to fear from such a plebiscite.
There are also over 2 million Kashmiris, primarily from Pakistan's side, settled in Europe, primarily Britain. I assume they will be given a vote in such a plebiscite as well.
That is not self-determination, and elections under India do not substitute for the plebiscite mandated by the rules of partition and UNSC resolutions - if that were the case then the UNSC resolutions would have stated that.
In any case, elections under Indian rule and occupation cannot be taken as acceptance of India just as elections in British India under British rule could not be taken as acceptance of British rule and occupation.
the launch of RISAT2 on march 20 2009 and the increase in foiled infiltration seem to coincide.