Srinivas
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 12,455
- Reaction score
- -26
- Country
- Location
Chinese talking about human rightsIndia is seriously violating human rights.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Chinese talking about human rightsIndia is seriously violating human rights.
Where? What countries?I wouldn't call the 60 odd countries who have out and out supported the plight of Kashmiris, "disillusioned".
Again, what brutality are you talking about? Anyone who picks up arms against the State knows the consequences (hopefully) and our democratically elected govt has the right - bestowed upon them by the majority mandate and Indian constitution - to respond appropriately. Also the Constitution does NOT allow for secession. Anyway, Kashmiris dont actually have a choice.I would, however, call you not in touch with reality if you think that the Kashmiris will suddenly accept Indian occupation after 63 years of brutality and resistance.
Forgiven, for expecting such internal data to be generated by non-Indian source.Forgive me if I don't trust the opinion of the perpetrator himself.
Rubbish. The so called 'administration' is post-settlement administration, not administration as of now.Nonsense. India has often discussed how to administer Kashmir, in fact several points of the agreement Musharraf worked out with Vajpayee were focused on how to administer Kashmir. Jaswant Singh has validated this view. Please get current on your reading.
Well, I will take those goalpost shifts, strawmen and non-sequiturs as confirmation that you do not exactly have a rebuttal.If you were the only one you wanted to convince, you shouldn't have bothered voicing your opinion.
Yes, the type of nonsense that happen to be the truth? What better proof of your head being buried in the sand than the fact that an internationally recognized dispute on which there are numerous UN resolutions, and declarations by dozens of countries viz their support for the plight of the terrorized Kashmiri people, strikes you as an 'internal' issue. Violence is once more growing in Kashmir and the fact that the people of this area have not accepted Indian subjugation for 63 years should give you a clue...
Kashmir is a nuclear bomb tucked under the armpit of a thief who thinks he has made off with the goods. If the Kashmir issue is not resolved, it will destroy India. Unfortunately, Nehru could not get this through his head, probably since he was a Kashmiri, but the people of the sub continent, and especially the hapless people of Kashmir who live in one the most heavily militarized regions on earth, with 650,000 occupation forces breathing down their neck, have paid a heavy price.
If it is so well supported by the UN then get a UN sanctions slapped on India as india got pakistani organisations slapped by UN sanctions by world support.As claimed by u, u already have the international backing(barking) with u.
Destroy India??My foot.
63 years...
India 1947.
Pakistan 1947.
India in 2010= india in 1947 + sikkim+auranachal pradesh+Goa+Huge economy+Huge military.
Remember this indian surge was obtained inspite of kashmir problem since 1989.
Pakistan in 2010=pakistan in 1947- bangladesh+ devastating internal security problems and economy.
So who is getting destroyed by the obsession of azadi and kashmir??
India or pakistan??
Pakistan in 2010
huuuuggggeee economy(huge like millions of impoverished indians)
huuuuuuggggggeee military(which cant even produce a proper missile, tank, aircraft etc)
huuuuggggeee economy(huge like millions of impoverished indians)
huuuuuuggggggeee military(which cant even produce a proper missile, tank, aircraft etc
copying and painting doesnt mean an original self written copy.rest u can understand
Who else would publish this?? By your logic, every claim Pakistan makes about its WOT within Pakistani borders is also a suspect.. Isnt it?
Well, I will take those goalpost shifts, strawmen and non-sequiturs as confirmation that you do not exactly have a rebuttal.
Convincing was not the purpose. Establishing was.
Forgiven, for expecting such internal data to be generated by non-Indian source.
Rubbish. The so called 'administration' is post-settlement administration, not administration as of now.
Where? What countries?
Talking about 'plight', Kashmiris are the most pampered lot in India with self-serving pompous pinheads for leaders.
Anyway, Kashmiris dont actually have a choice.
Seriously, make us a pitch - for discussion's sake - as to why Kashmir should join Pakistan (considering that Independence is not practically an option).
Talk about reality TechLahore, I would have appreciated you if you had not deleted Karan's post about the comparative casualty figures for J&K (an apparently restive region in India) and Pakistan (a country). A kneejerk reaction to the data by blaming 'foreign sponsored terrorism in Pakistan' (a phrase so ironic) speaks volumes about 'touch with reality'. For your country's better future, IMHO, you should've accepted this reality.
New Recruit
New Recruit