bandit
BANNED
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,265
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Instead of all the above reasons i think one reason is enough, Kashmir doesn't belong to India and Pakistan has every reason to have concern for it. Now you make your theories but the fact doesn't change that Pakistan consider Kashmir to be disputed territory and would continue to support Kashmiri no matter how many times you repeat the rant of integral part.
Oh those aren't my theories sweety, UN agreed if anybody has a legal stance on Kashmir its India. You got an issue, take it up with UN. Oh, btw Pakistan was at the table when these negotiations occured.
[
Who says? Bharat? Not acceptable.
No. its the UN. Aren't you the cheerleaders for the UN resolutions, when the UN asked for full withdrawal of Pakistani forces but let the Indian forces remain, it was confirmation that Pakistan has no right on Kashmir.
I think this is all BS. Until end the rant of integral part of India it doesn't matter whether Pakistan has control of AJK or not. Once you accept IOK as a a part of disputed territory you have the right to accuse us of "illegally" occupying AJK.
Well looking up to India to establish standards eh, why don't you make some of your own, and until then get off the high horse of "Illegal Indian Occupation".