Again nonsense... there is no ongoing military operation in baluchistan n only FC is deployed there.. n tht too in garrisons..
Yes only a few drone strikes happened during musharaf rule... now its been civilian govt since the last 6+ years..
Again an example of justice denied..
Even if i agree (which i dnt)... still all indians ... or atleast 99.9 except u... dnt accept this fact?
Its not outdated its actually a great idea... hold a referendum... accept tht peoples choice n move on.. as for recognizing LOC... It wont be accepted by the general public of Pak or even Kashmir... not even the armed forces of Pakistan
Again nonsense... there is no ongoing military operation in baluchistan n only FC is deployed there.. n tht too in garrisons..
Yes only a few drone strikes happened during musharaf rule... now its been civilian govt since the last 6+ years..
Again an example of justice denied..
Even if i agree (which i dnt)... still all indians ... or atleast 99.9 except u... dnt accept this fact?
Its not outdated its actually a great idea... hold a referendum... accept tht peoples choice n move on.. as for recognizing LOC... It wont be accepted by the general public of Pak or even Kashmir... not even the armed forces of Pakistan
-RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION FOR INDIA AND PAKISTAN ON 13 AUGUST 1948. (DOCUMENT NO. S/1100, PARA 75, DATED THE 9TH NOVEMBER, 1948)
The resolution clearly states:
1.The presence of troops of Pakistan in the territory of the State of Jammu and Kashmir constitutes a material change in the situation and the Government of Pakistan agrees to withdraw its troops from that State….
Question1.Did the Government of Pakistan removed its forces from the State of Kashmir as per UN Resolution of 1948?
2.The Government of Pakistan will use its best endeavour to secure the withdrawal from the State of Jammu and Kashmir of tribesmen and Pakistan nationals …………..
Question 2.So, The UN agreed that pashtun tribal who were not a part of Kashmir were fighting along with army regulars you agree?
3.Pending a final solution the territory evacuated by the Pakistan troops will be administered by the local authorities under the surveillance of the Commission…….. the Indian Government will maintain within the lines existing at the moment of cease-fire the minimum strength of its forces which in agreement with the Commission are considered necessary to assist local authorities in the observance of law and order.
Question 3.When the UN commission decided that Indian forces are to be kept to maintain minimum law and order did Pakistan vacate *** as per instructions of the United Nations?
4..When the Commission shall have notified the Government of India that the tribesmen and Pakistan nationals referred to in Part II A 2 hereof have withdrawn……
Question4 Has Pakistan notified the UN or Party to dispute “India” about tribesmen and Pakistani nationals withdrawing from Kashmir?.
There is a misunderstanding that the resolution contained only a plebiscite. If you check the resolution it contains three steps in sequence
a)Cease Fire(was implemented and the result is present day LOC)
b)Truce agreement(produced next post)
c)Plebiscite
Often the plebiscite is quoted by Pakistani authorities without the mention of truce agreement. The logical step should be implement Cease fire—Truce agreement—and then Plebiscite for Kashmir to determine their fate.